No wum just telling the truth. Burns would get beat down by Broner in a one sided fight. Broner is elite and Burns is below world class. I am not slagging off Burns am I. He is a paper champion as he not proved to be the best at 130 or 135 has he? If Burns beats a top 5 fighter in his division I will give him credit. He is not a true world champion till he beats the number one fighter in his division which is Adrien Broner.
It is common knowledge in the boxing world that Ricky Burns and his team have been ducking Broner at 130 or 135.
Gunner what you're saying is pretty deluded to be honest, Broner has a lot of potential and i rate him as one of the future best boxers in the world but he is not an elite fighter at the moment in the slightest, he's thought nobody of any note and even Gavin Rees caused him problems last time who is small, weak and has no power and a fighter with more power would have caused Broner even more problems
Oscar
He beat DeMarco a top 5 fighter in his division and I agree he needs to more solid fights but he has been chasing Burns who prefers to hide behind his team and promoters. Bradley, Peterson and Alexander etc have sparred the guy and say he is the real deal. I think he opened up against Rees as he knew Rees couldn't hurt him. DeMarco is a big puncher and couldn't make a dent in Broner.
Broner is like Mayweather who look vulnerable in the first few rounds till they work the opponent out and then dish out beatings. Broner is rated in top 10 and 15 pound for pound by various boxing columns such as the ring magazine.
Paper champion
He defeated Martinez, who had two successful defences prior to the fight and held the title for over a year.
Then he stepped up a weight division and defeated Katsidis with a comfortable UD decision.
He then schooled Moses, and destroyed Mitchell. Both very competent fighters.
He was then due to fight Vazquez until Vazquez pulled out as he obviously didn't wanna risk losing his title for the money on offer from Warren.
So tell me where Burns has ducked fights, or doesn't fight the best? He's said on numerous occasions he wants the a Broner fight. Go make up more nonsense elsewhere where people will buy it.
Broner doesn't feature in either of the Ring editor's p4p top ten's
And other than that, the Ring isn't the magazine it used to be. It's no surprise they often rate Golden Boy fighters higher than other mags and boxing pundits
Yes a paper champion I know way more about boxing then you. He is a paper champion till he beats the man and becomes number one at a weight division. He hasn't done that at 130 or 135. No one rates him number one either so that means in boxing that your a paper champion.
Mitchell is a domestic level fighter and Katsidis was a shot fighter and way past his best. Moses and Martinez are nothing more than decent. He defended it against hand picked opponents. Broner become his number one mandatory at 130. Guess what he vacates his title and moves up instead of having to defend. That was his first duck of Broner. Frank Warren won him the world title at 130 and 135. WBO should change it to Warren Boxing Organisation.
He avoided a reschedueled fight with Vazquez to face another handpicked opponent. Broner and GoldenBoy then offer Ricky Burns and his team a fight this summer which Burns rejected. Duck number 2.
The only nonsense is from a Burn nuthugger like yourself. Go on the boxing forums and they will all tell you Burns is a paper champion who has avoided Broner like the plague.
http://ringtv.craveonline.com/ratings
Broner number 6
http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/news/pound-pound-rankings-124639596.html
Broner rated 12
http://espn.go.com/boxing/story/_/id/9249693/espn-pound-pound-rankings
Joint 11th.
If Golden Boy was bias why was Pacquiao still joint top with Mayweather after losing to Bradley? Also Golden Boy have the best stable in boxing.
So by your definition Hopkins, Cleverly, Sergio Martinez, Mallinagi, Vasquez, Mares etc are all paper champions as they've either a) not fought Broner or have had opponents cherry picked b) aren't rated as no.1 opinion their division
You're a clown
So Broner isn't top 10 p4p outwith Ring magazine.
And that isn't evidence of bias toward Golden Boy by Ring how?
You just made the case for the argument against you
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
I said Broner was top 10 and 15 in various boxing columns such as the ring magazine. Owned again jukebox
Owned
You claim to know your boxing and constantly come out with crap. You're running rings around yourself with your inane nonsense.
Give it a rest.
Everyone knows about the cold war in boxing between top rank and golden boy. Yet 3 top rank boxers are in in their at the moment. In fact before Donaire lost to Rigondeaux there was more top rank fighters in the top 10 than Golden Boy. Owned again jukebox.
Jukebox
I am coming out with facts, your the one coming out with garbage. You tried to big up Kevin Mitchell as one of Burns best wins.
Kevin Mitchell is domestic level.
You tried telling me Hopkins is a paper champ
I've gotta fact for you. You're a tube
Nice try jukebox your a clown and been owned again.
Ignore this clown he obviously knows feck all about boxing
Nae airs or graces wi Burns - good, solid boxer wi heart and good technique. He’s no one tae dis an opponent either. Wants the big fights and I hope he gets them.
Looking forward to the fight as the other boy seems tidy enough.
Ricky to win the fight though.
In tae um!
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Aww Jukebox your calling your fellow friends after getting a pasting. Let me guess another blind Burns nuthugger. You remind of the Ricky Hatton fans that thought they would beat Mayweather. Difference between Hatton and Burns is Hatton was a real champion at a weight class.
"so yes Hopkins is a paper champion"
That's a quote from yourself. You're tying yourself in knots. Maybe try taking a step away from the keyboard, take a few deep breathes, and recognise the fact that you are a tube.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
I’ll let others reading this thread to decide who’s talking pash
How can I twist it? Those are your words.
Sign in if you want to comment
Burns v Gonzalez
Page 2 of 7
6 | 7
posted on 11/5/13
No wum just telling the truth. Burns would get beat down by Broner in a one sided fight. Broner is elite and Burns is below world class. I am not slagging off Burns am I. He is a paper champion as he not proved to be the best at 130 or 135 has he? If Burns beats a top 5 fighter in his division I will give him credit. He is not a true world champion till he beats the number one fighter in his division which is Adrien Broner.
It is common knowledge in the boxing world that Ricky Burns and his team have been ducking Broner at 130 or 135.
posted on 11/5/13
Gunner what you're saying is pretty deluded to be honest, Broner has a lot of potential and i rate him as one of the future best boxers in the world but he is not an elite fighter at the moment in the slightest, he's thought nobody of any note and even Gavin Rees caused him problems last time who is small, weak and has no power and a fighter with more power would have caused Broner even more problems
posted on 11/5/13
Oscar
He beat DeMarco a top 5 fighter in his division and I agree he needs to more solid fights but he has been chasing Burns who prefers to hide behind his team and promoters. Bradley, Peterson and Alexander etc have sparred the guy and say he is the real deal. I think he opened up against Rees as he knew Rees couldn't hurt him. DeMarco is a big puncher and couldn't make a dent in Broner.
posted on 11/5/13
Broner is like Mayweather who look vulnerable in the first few rounds till they work the opponent out and then dish out beatings. Broner is rated in top 10 and 15 pound for pound by various boxing columns such as the ring magazine.
posted on 11/5/13
Paper champion
He defeated Martinez, who had two successful defences prior to the fight and held the title for over a year.
Then he stepped up a weight division and defeated Katsidis with a comfortable UD decision.
He then schooled Moses, and destroyed Mitchell. Both very competent fighters.
He was then due to fight Vazquez until Vazquez pulled out as he obviously didn't wanna risk losing his title for the money on offer from Warren.
So tell me where Burns has ducked fights, or doesn't fight the best? He's said on numerous occasions he wants the a Broner fight. Go make up more nonsense elsewhere where people will buy it.
posted on 11/5/13
Broner doesn't feature in either of the Ring editor's p4p top ten's
posted on 11/5/13
And other than that, the Ring isn't the magazine it used to be. It's no surprise they often rate Golden Boy fighters higher than other mags and boxing pundits
posted on 11/5/13
Yes a paper champion I know way more about boxing then you. He is a paper champion till he beats the man and becomes number one at a weight division. He hasn't done that at 130 or 135. No one rates him number one either so that means in boxing that your a paper champion.
Mitchell is a domestic level fighter and Katsidis was a shot fighter and way past his best. Moses and Martinez are nothing more than decent. He defended it against hand picked opponents. Broner become his number one mandatory at 130. Guess what he vacates his title and moves up instead of having to defend. That was his first duck of Broner. Frank Warren won him the world title at 130 and 135. WBO should change it to Warren Boxing Organisation.
He avoided a reschedueled fight with Vazquez to face another handpicked opponent. Broner and GoldenBoy then offer Ricky Burns and his team a fight this summer which Burns rejected. Duck number 2.
The only nonsense is from a Burn nuthugger like yourself. Go on the boxing forums and they will all tell you Burns is a paper champion who has avoided Broner like the plague.
posted on 11/5/13
http://ringtv.craveonline.com/ratings
Broner number 6
posted on 11/5/13
http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/news/pound-pound-rankings-124639596.html
Broner rated 12
http://espn.go.com/boxing/story/_/id/9249693/espn-pound-pound-rankings
Joint 11th.
If Golden Boy was bias why was Pacquiao still joint top with Mayweather after losing to Bradley? Also Golden Boy have the best stable in boxing.
posted on 11/5/13
So by your definition Hopkins, Cleverly, Sergio Martinez, Mallinagi, Vasquez, Mares etc are all paper champions as they've either a) not fought Broner or have had opponents cherry picked b) aren't rated as no.1 opinion their division
You're a clown
posted on 11/5/13
So Broner isn't top 10 p4p outwith Ring magazine.
And that isn't evidence of bias toward Golden Boy by Ring how?
You just made the case for the argument against you
posted on 11/5/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 11/5/13
I said Broner was top 10 and 15 in various boxing columns such as the ring magazine. Owned again jukebox
posted on 11/5/13
Owned
You claim to know your boxing and constantly come out with crap. You're running rings around yourself with your inane nonsense.
Give it a rest.
posted on 11/5/13
Everyone knows about the cold war in boxing between top rank and golden boy. Yet 3 top rank boxers are in in their at the moment. In fact before Donaire lost to Rigondeaux there was more top rank fighters in the top 10 than Golden Boy. Owned again jukebox.
posted on 11/5/13
Jukebox
I am coming out with facts, your the one coming out with garbage. You tried to big up Kevin Mitchell as one of Burns best wins.
Kevin Mitchell is domestic level.
posted on 11/5/13
You tried telling me Hopkins is a paper champ
I've gotta fact for you. You're a tube
posted on 11/5/13
Nice try jukebox your a clown and been owned again.
Ignore this clown he obviously knows feck all about boxing
Nae airs or graces wi Burns - good, solid boxer wi heart and good technique. He’s no one tae dis an opponent either. Wants the big fights and I hope he gets them.
Looking forward to the fight as the other boy seems tidy enough.
Ricky to win the fight though.
In tae um!
posted on 11/5/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 11/5/13
Aww Jukebox your calling your fellow friends after getting a pasting. Let me guess another blind Burns nuthugger. You remind of the Ricky Hatton fans that thought they would beat Mayweather. Difference between Hatton and Burns is Hatton was a real champion at a weight class.
posted on 11/5/13
"so yes Hopkins is a paper champion"
That's a quote from yourself. You're tying yourself in knots. Maybe try taking a step away from the keyboard, take a few deep breathes, and recognise the fact that you are a tube.
posted on 11/5/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 11/5/13
I’ll let others reading this thread to decide who’s talking pash
posted on 11/5/13
How can I twist it? Those are your words.
Page 2 of 7
6 | 7