the unnamed thread is easy to ignore, do it

Thanks for that great info Wilshere.

The Emma Watson thread does not do any harm to the site in any way whatsoever. Its content is kept purely in that thread and you can just avoid it, unlike the content found in many of the 'Wum Grr Arsenal' threads.

If something you read in a thread puts you off a website in its entirety you need to get your life sorted

Clearly you're all a little bit brain dead tonight and seem to think I insulted the 'emma watson' thread. What I actually stated was that a not safe for work type board would lead to your little perv thread multiplied by 10. Which would put people off using the forum.

Take a look at the unnamed thread our good friend Forza got into a fit of rage about and multiply it by 10. It does attract some weird, lonely posters (rejects)(ArseDog), but it also puts a lot of people off the website

---------------

So what does the phrase 'it does' refer to then?

If that thread got rid of Forza then it's already proved it's worth

That was a joke, in reference to dog, not yourself and clearly pointed out at the bottom of my comment. Stop being a bell and go back to the perv cave.

Or at least take a moment to turn your brain on and your emotions off before you reply.

8bit.. In your opinion. I actually quite liked Forza, he always provided good conversation on the record thread

Forza was a paper tiger

purged

the fact is everyone was happy with that thread until they became bored of it. now those people are just trying to ruin it for others by complaining about it

by everyone you mean about 5 people.

Ron

Thanks for wording things stupidly and then insulting me for reading it how you wrote it

Don't want to make a big deal out of something stupid like this though.

Forza being removed indeed made it worth it.

Well I wouldn't say happy personally, but no one was banging a drum and finding it irritating until later on.
Admins have stored a filter mechanism to block users you don't want to read. Due to them not coming up with an updated device, the only way to not read certain articles is to ignore them completely

Why all this commotion at 00:28?

Hang on, filters don't come up on updated devices?

Clearly you didnt read it how it was typed, hence the misunderstanding being solved with an extremely simple explanation. I'll try not to make the error of 'wording things stupidly' in future though.

Ron,

Can we play a game?

You will get it.

Charlie

My sleep pattern means all my work gets done when it's dark outside

I'm nocturnal. I sleep all day party all night.

Ron

Could justify what I meant but honestly can't be facked now

Chambers, the filter thing seems to work for me on everything at the moment. Works a treat and more people should utilise it.

Thanks for filling me in on that chambers but I think ive only ever viewed the thread once so I dont really need the lecture from emma watson and her merry men.

Feel free to have another poster come here and tell us all how there is a filter option in addition to the power of ignorance though.

Charlie.

No thanks.

Ron,

Does the elephant man ever remind you if something? (Just nod your head )

Penguin, I meant admin haven't built a device to block specific singled articles, so the best thing to do with those articles is simply ignore it