or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 42 comments are related to an article called:

The mysterious 95%

Page 1 of 2

posted on 6/6/13

Honestly wolfie you shouldn't have bothered, the reality is that nobody really cares, probably around 95% all you are doing is playing into the hands of two posters whose only intention is to get to you, hence you will struggle to find either commenting on anything relevant to the coming season/manager/players.

posted on 6/6/13

Comment deleted by Article Creator

posted on 6/6/13

Cinci, it's easier said than done. But when you are constantly bombarded with insults, it is not and never has been in my nature to turn the other cheek. Some can and if were just the odd comment now and again I probably would, but it's on a daily basis.

I'm sure it's getting boring for everyone on here, but apart from you making the odd remark, no one else tells them to desist. Perhaps if a few more did, then we could concentrate on the upcoming season and what will happen after players come back for training in a few weeks.

posted on 6/6/13

I've written this article because I'm unable to respond on tatter's one. It was he who brought up the subject and I'm responding to it.

Again the insults continue and your comment will be deleted.

posted on 6/6/13

The thing is wolfie, most on here are fully aware of who the real idiots are.....people may not agree with your opinions and think you daft for some of them but everybody recognises who the genuine grade A imbeciles are for how they act on here....one in particular takes great pleasure in ridiculing the physically handicapped.....and a majority ignore him because it is all he is worth.

posted on 6/6/13

Comment deleted by Article Creator

posted on 6/6/13

Comment deleted by Article Creator

posted on 6/6/13

I would suggest you ditch this article wolfie, its gonna create plenty of ammo for another few weeks I fear.
And I really dont want to sit through that garbage, way to many other things to be discussing, things that will keep certain posters very quiet as they have nothing to give.

posted on 6/6/13

96% of posters didn't finish reading this thread.

comment by TaraTV (U16260)

posted on 6/6/13

"....one in particular takes great pleasure in ridiculing the physically handicapped.....and a majority ignore him because it is all he is worth....."

I once had a go at somebody on 12 yards for what he said about another poster only to find that I had been hoodwinked.

I don't bother now.

Theres buttons, on here, people can press if they have a problem.

posted on 7/6/13

Ah, just like old times when we were Premiership...with DJ & Wolfie arguing about whether Mick should be sacked.

posted on 7/6/13

Would love to have witnessed that simon as they both shared the same view on the subject a few times over the last few years

posted on 7/6/13

This is about a thread I started yesterday, reporting on O'Hara's comments to the newspapers.

I think 97.3% of posters would have no problems with me starting the article that I did. In fact I'm amazed that anyone was upset enough to complain.

Do I send future articles of mine to Witss for approval, before I post? The question isn't even worth considering, as 76.8% have already testified...

posted on 7/6/13

Recent history is relevant to where we are now so is going to be mentioned.

But why don't posters, if they are particularly fed -up with a subject simply not read articles about it ?

The same if there is a poster that particularly grates.

posted on 7/6/13

This is another fantastic article about the sacking of a previous manager, let me start by saying well done for bringing this to the debating table. Well done.

For me, the debate have moved on from whether it was the right decision or timing to dismiss Mick when we did. Whether or not the percentage that wanted him out was 95% or 90% or 50% seems a mute point at this time.

I think what we are struggling to get our heads round is how anybody in their right mind could claim that the decision to change managers when we did WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT was the correct one.

Even now when we are languishing in League One at our lowest point in decades there are some on here, about 2.7%, that think Morgan made the right decision to sack Mick. That's what the rest of us, the other 97.3%, can't get our rational heads round wolfie.

It was a MONUMENTAL mistake to sack Mick when we didn't have a better manager lined up to replace him. If you could just bring yourself to admit that wolfie then I think you would get a great deal more respect from other posters on here.

It's not that hard to say "I was wrong".

Try it wolfie.

posted on 7/6/13

Being able to put forward a view even when you are in a 2% minority is known as FREEDOM OF SPEECH !!

posted on 7/6/13

Perhaps it was wrong of O'Hara to make the statement, being still in the employ of the club.

posted on 7/6/13

That's my point Mike. And it applies to the 98% as well.

posted on 7/6/13

DejaVu.....we DID have someone lined up, that's just the point. It was AC. What happened was after he agreed to take the reigns, he had second thoughts about the 13 game contract.

Theat's when it went pear shaped.

posted on 7/6/13

Doesn't sound very "lined up" to me.

Let's face it - it was a knee-jerk reaction that has cost the club dearly.

posted on 7/6/13

So, not lined up at all then?

posted on 7/6/13

I don't know why we're still taking about this. My heart sinks every time I think about it...

posted on 7/6/13

No, not lined up at all actually.

posted on 7/6/13

Thats good enough for me bute

posted on 7/6/13

Must be in your feet by now Bute.

Page 1 of 2

Sign in if you want to comment