or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 154 comments are related to an article called:

Proper football club

Page 4 of 7

posted on 27/7/13

Same old story from last season. We are conceding goals yet again. Ok, it's a premiership side, but they did say on sky sports our players look unfit. You need to get them back on allestree park Nigel
If any of our members went, who impressed and what was johnny Russell like?

posted on 27/7/13

Like I said Wassa, pedestrian performance. No one stood out as bad or good. The slow nature of the game was made obvious when Sammon came on but his lack of finish was there again. First touch looked better though. Russell had some decent moments but final ball was out. We didn't play to his strength which I think will be getting onto a through ball. He had good control.

Nigel has to decide on Hendrick or Bryson To play alongside Hugh's. The three of them doesn't work as we lack proper width. This is what competition for places is about. One on the bench will make the other two play better.

posted on 27/7/13

I thought we looked decent. Grant looked solid.
Keogh good game, full blacks ok. Ben Davies did well when he came on at RB.

Good game from Hughes, other midfielders pretty quiet.

Russell and Martin looked very promising I thought. Real understanding and cohesion, exactly what we lacked last season.

Sammon: Through on goal, legs went to jelly, arms and legs started flailing, fluffed the opportunity. Same old.

Bring on next season. High hopes for the front 2.



posted on 27/7/13

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by LloydX (U6993)

posted on 27/7/13

Jamie Mackie signs for Forest. 14 comments

Brayford leaves. 285 comments.

Conclusive proof that it's easier to complain than show you're content. Regarding the huge fan base that represents I'd hazard a guess that half a dozen people posted 90% of the 285 posts. Conclusive proof that there are some serious bores at the wrong end of the A52.

posted on 27/7/13

Alright Rev?

May not be very sporting but I honestly couldn't afford to pay you!

I'd have a fiver with you max?

Others may take you up?

posted on 27/7/13

Well I went to the game and didn't see much to get excited about. Grant looked good and distributed well. Freeman was poor. Hughes was ineffective. Keogh and Buxton were good but occasionally Bucko looked slow. Martin and Russell look like they might score a few. How many will determine Derby's season. Martin especially looked much more interested than last season. Perhaps he has accepted his drop in status now.

Ben Davies was a big improvement over Freeman when he came on. I liked Freeman last year - perhaps it was the heat.

Ward was OK but Hendrick was not so effective.

Improvement all round is needed

posted on 27/7/13

Clough: OUT by Christmas

comment by sutton (U3208)

posted on 27/7/13



Absolutely pathetic

posted on 27/7/13

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 27/7/13

comment by revspencer (U1885)

posted 10 hours, 36 minutes ago


His and Peter Taylor's statue even shows that - with their backs to the Stadium, facing towards Nottingham.

----------------

Learn some geography you prattock.

The statues may well have their backs to Pride Park Stadium, but they are also turned to Nottingham. They both look out over the city of Derby, a place they both held in their hearts with great affection. I could be wrong but I think the statues practically faces where the mighty Baseball Ground once stood.

posted on 27/7/13

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 27/7/13

Why do you have to include a with every fu(king post you write Bev, you do realise you're laughing alone you prat.

comment by Maяcо (U1329)

posted on 27/7/13

comment by Admin2 (U2)
posted 4 weeks ago
I could be wrong, but I believe that article was pulled as the OP was failing to moderate it and complaining about comments made on it.
Add Comment | Complain about this Comment
comment by Admin1 (U1)
posted 4 weeks ago
Admin2, you are indeed correct.

Comment: "And bears Shiite in a Forest. " was complained about at 2013-06-29 09:58:45 by user revspencer (U1885) who is a believe a Forest fan and who I assume must have so upset he was unable to find the delete button right next to the comment.

---

Owd rev, creating a wum article then trying to get Igor banned. Classy.

posted on 27/7/13

People put the laughing face in to show that they have written something funny. No one would know otherwise.

posted on 27/7/13

Or in Direby's case laughing at something that is a joke and is funny. That's what you mean spart.

comment by Maяcо (U1329)

posted on 27/7/13

Is it wrong to laugh at a joke that is funny then Pep?

Weird.

posted on 27/7/13

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 27/7/13

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 27/7/13

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 27/7/13

Milf not weird at all the ..the source is the joke (Direby) the output is funny and therefore the result is to laugh. Just logic Milf

posted on 27/7/13

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 27/7/13

Browse: Fishing

You are too easy Bevspencer

comment by Maяcо (U1329)

posted on 27/7/13

Maybe you should word your 'banter' a little better Pep, it's better if it at least makes some sense

Owd rev, got found out but hoped everyone would forget in 4 weeks. Tragic.

posted on 27/7/13

Do you mean laughing at changing the name Derby to direby then pep? I am splitting my sides at that one.

You can't be laughing at the team Derby as I remember last season when we beat you yet again at the kennel that you all seemed to be angry. Or is the team Derby something to laugh at when you win. If so you have only had three laughs in the last 5 years. Sometimes I fail to understand you lot from the darker side. What you find to laugh at, Tonto laughs at numbers, the rev laughs at any sentence he writes (your funeral services must go down a bomb) and pep laughs at corny jokes. Still it takes all sorts to make a world.

Page 4 of 7

Sign in if you want to comment