Mental Health is a serious illness..that's why i never outed Jungle to the forum, i thought the guy may suffer over it..but alas.

Bubble I genuinely don't think it is a case of being untouchable. But it is a cause of tediousness, "look everyone the isn't he nasty", "look what the person posted, isn't it shocking". Both sets of fans have people who absolutely thrive off of that.

Aye dont say nuthin aboot the psychologically imbalanced tim ffs

comment by bubblebhoy (U3429)

posted 6 seconds ago

Mental Health is a serious illness..that's why i never outed Jungle to the forum, i thought the guy may suffer over it..but alas.
--------------------------
We held a fairly similar view.

"It's the guy at the back that suffers and even then here's the monks chain which covers everyone"

The guy at the back has to poke his ain erse. Always been the way of it since I was a nipper...

#2fingersor3?

We held a fairly similar view.
--------

Obviously supper ally didnt.

comment by Chu - insert witty repartee here (U14549)

posted 1 second ago

We held a fairly similar view.
--------

Obviously supper ally didnt.
-------------------

Ally's views are his own. Probably when he was running a marathon he would have some time to formulate them.

Big bad ally

Poor wee jungle

"We held a fairly similar view."

"We" - and Admin runs this site himself...

Just Another Split Personality "Keep commenting (on your own threads), Creating (alter-egos) and debating (how to kill off your characters)..."

Bubble I genuinely don't think it is a case of being untouchable. But it is a cause of tediousness, "look everyone the isn't he nasty", "look what the person posted, isn't it shocking". Both sets of fans have people who absolutely thrive off of that.
.....................................................
Ally no doubt bring a lot of this on himself with some snidey comments which we are all guilty of, but ally sometimes can take it to another level with his views.

Ally's views are his own.
------

Although as confirmed by bubble he had agreed to not reveal it.

Just out of curiosity admin if an article was created and it's main purpise was clearly just to attack another poster.

If I was to complain about that article on the grounds that it's only purpose was bullying. If admin agreed that was it's main purpose would it get pulled?

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

St Jungle..im up for that one..Thanks DC.

comment by bubblebhoy (U3429)

posted 1 second ago

Bubble I genuinely don't think it is a case of being untouchable. But it is a cause of tediousness, "look everyone the isn't he nasty", "look what the person posted, isn't it shocking". Both sets of fans have people who absolutely thrive off of that.
.....................................................
Ally no doubt bring a lot of this on himself with some snidey comments which we are all guilty of, but ally sometimes can take it to another level with his views.
-----------------
There are a few posters good at that. Best filtered from your articles and site experience.

mment by Chu - insert witty repartee here (U14549)
posted 3 minutes ago
We held a fairly similar view.
--------

Obviously supper ally didnt

Did someone say supper? Just reminded how hungry I am

Curly you wished that jungle died a slow painful death ffs

Nobody has wished death on gazza.

Chu - He was talkin about the character, not the creator

Some amount of hypocrisy from you, Chu.

Chu your a tad hypocritical to pull anyone else up for not chinning their fellow fans...

I've yet to see you do it...

The only surprise that this is now being deflected back to Ally is that it's taken so long

(and yes I discussed with Mex how the 'go home' comments could be construed as racist)

Use the filter button.

There are folk on here who will just argue and argue and argue...and even when you clearly show they are wrong they carry on. It's pointless arguing with them.

Get them filtered and your 606 experience is much better

comment by super phoenix rangers -#prayforjinky (U14864)

posted 1 minute ago

Just out of curiosity admin if an article was created and it's main purpise was clearly just to attack another poster.

If I was to complain about that article on the grounds that it's only purpose was bullying. If admin agreed that was it's main purpose would it get pulled?
-------------------
Generally if an article is about you and you complain. It will get removed, everyone has the right to have articles about themselves removed. I can't stand moral crusaders fighting for the rights of others though. "Look poster X is being nasty to poster Y", "he said something nasy about him". We assume most on here are adults who are capable of raising the issue with us themselves. The less playground like the better, which might be a big ask given the last 6 months or so.

comment by ZACHSDA(I played a part in Jungle's bungl... (U1850)
posted 31 minutes ago
I have took your advice re filtering Admin1, its a great wee tool

Curly It's taken you're advice, not took.
Grammar separates us fron monkeys up trees.


************************

Zach

It's actually "taken your advice" but thanks for trying


Spelling <nazi> Murney is here

de bear you obviously didnt read my article condemning threats against sdf and his job.

de bear you obviously didnt read my article condemning threats against sdf and his job.

---------------------

No - I never seen that

Threats? Jèezus...

I won't search for it in case it stirs up any more trouble but I'll take you at your word you did