Rather have Beckham on the pitch then Milner
I think Lampard is a de facto #10!
-------------------------------
Oh great another #10 at Chelsea.
I'm looking forward to seeing how Lambert does against good oppo.
Last season he was excellent away to City. I wonder if he can do that tonight.
Cole bombing forward rarely actually leads to anything. He's not that great going forward.
I think Baines should have been played if Milner is gonna start. Roy doesn't have the balls to drop the big names for these games though.
baines will come on for cole 2nd half.
Roy dropped Lampard for the Montenegro game and played Carrick and Cleverley!
dropping 1 player to field 2 others. Roy breaking the rules already
Carrick and Cleverley have to play with their legs tied together?
Cole is crap going forward. Raises his game for the big games for Chelsea defensively.
Also I don't mind Milner. He's someone who any top team in the PL could utilise as a useful squad player.
Hoping the experience of our team will play a part in getting a positive result tonight, just really wish th approach to the game was more positive.
And he's certainly a better option than Welbeck
Though Carrick and Cleverley is as good as a 3 legged man playing on his own
Not quite sure why anyone has a problem with Wellbeck playing for England, he has a better goal scoring ratio than Henry had for France.
Welbeck is brilliant for england, he may have no skill but its the goals that count
A commentary on Sport.ua website says: "Many will say that the strength of the England team is exaggerated. It's true, most English clubs rely on imported players, and the British school of football cannot boast anything like the sort of harvest the Netherlands, France or Germany produce every year. But a team that everyone overestimates couldn't possibly reach the play-offs in virtually all tournaments and achieve results there."
Cole is good at moving forward but very rarely does anything.
He is always available for a pass that's it.
Baines actually makes something happen in the final third, and defends as well as anyone these days too.
He should have been in the team for the last 18 months or so.
Ashley Cole has been great for England, but Baines is now better than him.
It's time for Walcott to pull his socks up and put in a good performance in an important game.
Crouch has an amazing goal scoring record for England too, should he be in the team too then?
Your point? I couldn't care less, Crouch also has a better record for England than Henry did for France, both Welbeck and Crouch aren't fit to lace Henry's boots.
3 of his goals were also in friendlies, and the other 3 against San Marino and Moldova. Welbeck > Henry
put it this way
Welbeck scored 2 PL goals last season and then was played CF for England
YOu can bet your bottom dollar that if lambert fails to score in 1 game he will be dropped regardless of club form
comment by Respected Neo Liverpool (U9135)
posted 12 seconds ago
Crouch has an amazing goal scoring record for England too, should he be in the team too then?
.......................
Not any more, but you couldnyt fault his record when he was in the team.
I never understood why he wasn't played more, he was always a pain for defenders to play against and got the goals.
I don't even know why you compared Thierry Henry to Welbeck. What a stupid comparison.
Sign in if you want to comment
FT: Ukraine 0-0 England Match Thread
Page 5 of 77
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10
posted on 10/9/13
Rather have Beckham on the pitch then Milner
posted on 10/9/13
I think Lampard is a de facto #10!
-------------------------------
Oh great another #10 at Chelsea.
posted on 10/9/13
I'm looking forward to seeing how Lambert does against good oppo.
Last season he was excellent away to City. I wonder if he can do that tonight.
posted on 10/9/13
Cole bombing forward rarely actually leads to anything. He's not that great going forward.
I think Baines should have been played if Milner is gonna start. Roy doesn't have the balls to drop the big names for these games though.
posted on 10/9/13
baines will come on for cole 2nd half.
posted on 10/9/13
Roy dropped Lampard for the Montenegro game and played Carrick and Cleverley!
posted on 10/9/13
dropping 1 player to field 2 others. Roy breaking the rules already
posted on 10/9/13
Carrick and Cleverley have to play with their legs tied together?
posted on 10/9/13
Cole is crap going forward. Raises his game for the big games for Chelsea defensively.
Also I don't mind Milner. He's someone who any top team in the PL could utilise as a useful squad player.
posted on 10/9/13
Hoping the experience of our team will play a part in getting a positive result tonight, just really wish th approach to the game was more positive.
posted on 10/9/13
And he's certainly a better option than Welbeck
posted on 10/9/13
Though Carrick and Cleverley is as good as a 3 legged man playing on his own
posted on 10/9/13
COME ON ENGLAND!
posted on 10/9/13
Not quite sure why anyone has a problem with Wellbeck playing for England, he has a better goal scoring ratio than Henry had for France.
posted on 10/9/13
Welbeck is brilliant for england, he may have no skill but its the goals that count
posted on 10/9/13
A commentary on Sport.ua website says: "Many will say that the strength of the England team is exaggerated. It's true, most English clubs rely on imported players, and the British school of football cannot boast anything like the sort of harvest the Netherlands, France or Germany produce every year. But a team that everyone overestimates couldn't possibly reach the play-offs in virtually all tournaments and achieve results there."
posted on 10/9/13
Cole is good at moving forward but very rarely does anything.
He is always available for a pass that's it.
Baines actually makes something happen in the final third, and defends as well as anyone these days too.
He should have been in the team for the last 18 months or so.
Ashley Cole has been great for England, but Baines is now better than him.
posted on 10/9/13
It's time for Walcott to pull his socks up and put in a good performance in an important game.
posted on 10/9/13
Crouch has an amazing goal scoring record for England too, should he be in the team too then?
posted on 10/9/13
Your point? I couldn't care less, Crouch also has a better record for England than Henry did for France, both Welbeck and Crouch aren't fit to lace Henry's boots.
3 of his goals were also in friendlies, and the other 3 against San Marino and Moldova. Welbeck > Henry
posted on 10/9/13
put it this way
Welbeck scored 2 PL goals last season and then was played CF for England
YOu can bet your bottom dollar that if lambert fails to score in 1 game he will be dropped regardless of club form
posted on 10/9/13
comment by Respected Neo Liverpool (U9135)
posted 12 seconds ago
Crouch has an amazing goal scoring record for England too, should he be in the team too then?
.......................
Not any more, but you couldnyt fault his record when he was in the team.
posted on 10/9/13
What time is the KO?
posted on 10/9/13
I never understood why he wasn't played more, he was always a pain for defenders to play against and got the goals.
posted on 10/9/13
I don't even know why you compared Thierry Henry to Welbeck. What a stupid comparison.
Page 5 of 77
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10