Spurs are alright, got the players to play decent football, just dont think its clicked yet for them(i hope it doesnt)
I would pay to watch Spurs easily. They are still a very good team to watch, and have some very talented players on the ball.
Chelsea aren't that bad when they aren't playing their 4-6-0......
Spurs do seem a bit less entertaining than last year....
United haven't been all that entertaining for a while.
Celebrating winning games is fairly normal especially close games like yesterday, it doesn't matter where they are in the league that would have been 2 points dropped.
I agree with 1 and 2, but in this form it is good to watch United.
Replace them with Stoke or the Dull City Tigers.
So you'd never go to Liverpool v man u/spurs/Chelsea?
Everywhere.....
I only focus on the boys in red.
I would pay to watch United.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
But you support hem you donkey.
harsh on chelsea and spurs, considering we have teams such as fulham, aston villa, and us in the second half.
I find us massively more enjoyable to watch this season than last year where we usually waited for a Bale thunderbolt.
Do miss the style of the team we had in Redknapps final year though sometimes.
Stoke, West Ham and Liverpool
Stoke, West Ham and Liverpool
correction,
Stoke, west ham, Man utd, liverpool's second halves
West Ham are definitely the worst team to watch.
Stoke have played some nice stuff at times this year
I don't think Liverpool have been particularly exciting in the first half of games either they have been winning but not exciting.
Liverpool are terribly boring to watch sometimes. So this attempted wum is somewhat self-defeating.
liverpool's second halves
----------------------------
Liverpool don't seem to be particularly good in second half of games. How many goals have the scored after half time? Is Rodgers slipping the players some of his son's rohypnol?
Spurs and Arsenal are very entertaining sides that play good football. Chelsea are exciting when they're not holding back. United have been boring since the Ronaldo/Rooney/Tevez partnership was dismantled
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
Teams you wouldn't pay........
Page 1 of 1
posted on 6/10/13
Spurs are alright, got the players to play decent football, just dont think its clicked yet for them(i hope it doesnt)
posted on 6/10/13
I would pay to watch Spurs easily. They are still a very good team to watch, and have some very talented players on the ball.
posted on 6/10/13
Chelsea aren't that bad when they aren't playing their 4-6-0......
Spurs do seem a bit less entertaining than last year....
United haven't been all that entertaining for a while.
Celebrating winning games is fairly normal especially close games like yesterday, it doesn't matter where they are in the league that would have been 2 points dropped.
posted on 6/10/13
I agree with 1 and 2, but in this form it is good to watch United.
Replace them with Stoke or the Dull City Tigers.
posted on 6/10/13
So you'd never go to Liverpool v man u/spurs/Chelsea?
posted on 6/10/13
Everywhere.....
I only focus on the boys in red.
posted on 6/10/13
I would pay to watch United.
posted on 6/10/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 6/10/13
But you support hem you donkey.
posted on 6/10/13
harsh on chelsea and spurs, considering we have teams such as fulham, aston villa, and us in the second half.
posted on 6/10/13
I find us massively more enjoyable to watch this season than last year where we usually waited for a Bale thunderbolt.
Do miss the style of the team we had in Redknapps final year though sometimes.
posted on 6/10/13
Stoke, West Ham and Liverpool
posted on 6/10/13
Stoke, West Ham and Liverpool
correction,
Stoke, west ham, Man utd, liverpool's second halves
posted on 6/10/13
^ ..
posted on 6/10/13
West Ham are definitely the worst team to watch.
Stoke have played some nice stuff at times this year
posted on 6/10/13
I don't think Liverpool have been particularly exciting in the first half of games either they have been winning but not exciting.
posted on 6/10/13
Liverpool are terribly boring to watch sometimes. So this attempted wum is somewhat self-defeating.
posted on 6/10/13
liverpool's second halves
----------------------------
Liverpool don't seem to be particularly good in second half of games. How many goals have the scored after half time? Is Rodgers slipping the players some of his son's rohypnol?
posted on 6/10/13
Spurs and Arsenal are very entertaining sides that play good football. Chelsea are exciting when they're not holding back. United have been boring since the Ronaldo/Rooney/Tevez partnership was dismantled
Page 1 of 1