GT you seem angry about it
So if Chelsea have got more money for a player they don't need why are you slaughtering Mourinho?
If someone overpaid for a player you don't need surely that's good business?
comment by Neo Liverpool (U9135)
posted less than a minute ago
GT you seem angry about it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For me it makes no sense. Chelsea's players policy is just appalling.
comment by Marcelino- Top 4 is On! (U6171)
posted less than a minute ago
So if Chelsea have got more money for a player they don't need why are you slaughtering Mourinho?
If someone overpaid for a player you don't need surely that's good business?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's because he's looking at it from a short term perspective. Next season, Chelsea could well regret it.
I agree GT, there logic is stupid.
comment by Gunnerthru (U6675)
posted 2 minutes ago
Mata alone wont solve United's problem anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not alone no
Mourinho has always been short-term, why do you think Chelsea and Inter had structural squad problems after he left!
comment by 50Mill (U1147)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Marcelino- Top 4 is On! (U6171)
posted less than a minute ago
So if Chelsea have got more money for a player they don't need why are you slaughtering Mourinho?
If someone overpaid for a player you don't need surely that's good business?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's because he's looking at it from a short term perspective. Next season, Chelsea could well regret it.
I agree GT, there logic is stupid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Stupid comment. You have no idea what Mourinho's thought process is over this deal (that's if it does go through) so you can't possibly claim that he's being short termist.
If someone overpaid for a player you don't need surely that's good business?
That's the question? Mata is absolute class. Since Mou overtake at Chelsea he isnt good enough all of a sudden. I think it has to do with Mou himself. Absolute ridiculous to sell him to United. Maybe it wont haunt Chelsea this season but it surely will haunt them in the near future.
Sunderland deserve an equaliser
Muriel needs to little bit grow up
Stupid comment. You have no idea what Mourinho's thought process is over this deal (that's if it does go through) so you can't possibly claim that he's being short termist.
-------
That's what it looks like from the outside, you clown. Unless there is a clause to get Rooney which I don't think there is, makes zero sense from Chelsea perspective.
Don't get me wrong, Gunnethru, I agree with you about Mata's ability and that but I'm sure Mourinho does have a plan.
Chelsea with Mata or Chelsea with a £30m-£40m striker, which is better? That's what Mourinho may be thinking...
should have been a foul red card
Balotelli is a bit leave it
comment by 50Mill (U1147)
posted 28 seconds ago
Stupid comment. You have no idea what Mourinho's thought process is over this deal (that's if it does go through) so you can't possibly claim that he's being short termist.
-------
That's what it looks like from the outside, you clown. Unless there is a clause to get Rooney which I don't think there is, makes zero sense from Chelsea perspective.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
It can only look like that if you completely fail to take an objective look at the deal. Chelsea are potentially £40m up without weakening their first 11 at all, with a chance to bring in players who can actually improve their team in the places they are actually weak.
Reckon this Milan game is so much better
comment by Grant Hanley versus the Universe (U3522)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by 50Mill (U1147)
posted 28 seconds ago
Stupid comment. You have no idea what Mourinho's thought process is over this deal (that's if it does go through) so you can't possibly claim that he's being short termist.
-------
That's what it looks like from the outside, you clown. Unless there is a clause to get Rooney which I don't think there is, makes zero sense from Chelsea perspective.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
It can only look like that if you completely fail to take an objective look at the deal. Chelsea are potentially £40m up without weakening their first 11 at all, with a chance to bring in players who can actually improve their team in the places they are actually weak.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But you don't sell a player of Mata's quality to anyone. They could easily have offered him to anywhere in Europe and they could take £35mill or so instead of £40mill from utd, and that would be more of an advantage.
Cattermole showing Welbeck a clean pair of heels
Stupid comment. You have no idea what Mourinho's thought process is over this deal (that's if it does go through) so you can't possibly claim that he's being short termist.
________________________
I doubt the guy has any longterm plans. The deal shows that. Mata is a proven PL League player and showed his class already. Buying someone new is always a risk.
.
Page 1198 of 40304
1199 | 1200 | 1201 | 1202 | 1203
posted on 22/1/14
GT you seem angry about it
posted on 22/1/14
So if Chelsea have got more money for a player they don't need why are you slaughtering Mourinho?
If someone overpaid for a player you don't need surely that's good business?
posted on 22/1/14
comment by Neo Liverpool (U9135)
posted less than a minute ago
GT you seem angry about it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For me it makes no sense. Chelsea's players policy is just appalling.
posted on 22/1/14
comment by Marcelino- Top 4 is On! (U6171)
posted less than a minute ago
So if Chelsea have got more money for a player they don't need why are you slaughtering Mourinho?
If someone overpaid for a player you don't need surely that's good business?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's because he's looking at it from a short term perspective. Next season, Chelsea could well regret it.
I agree GT, there logic is stupid.
posted on 22/1/14
comment by Gunnerthru (U6675)
posted 2 minutes ago
Mata alone wont solve United's problem anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not alone no
posted on 22/1/14
How poor are Sunderland!
posted on 22/1/14
Mourinho has always been short-term, why do you think Chelsea and Inter had structural squad problems after he left!
posted on 22/1/14
Great pass Carrick
posted on 22/1/14
comment by 50Mill (U1147)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Marcelino- Top 4 is On! (U6171)
posted less than a minute ago
So if Chelsea have got more money for a player they don't need why are you slaughtering Mourinho?
If someone overpaid for a player you don't need surely that's good business?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's because he's looking at it from a short term perspective. Next season, Chelsea could well regret it.
I agree GT, there logic is stupid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Stupid comment. You have no idea what Mourinho's thought process is over this deal (that's if it does go through) so you can't possibly claim that he's being short termist.
posted on 22/1/14
Gotta be scoring that
posted on 22/1/14
If someone overpaid for a player you don't need surely that's good business?
That's the question? Mata is absolute class. Since Mou overtake at Chelsea he isnt good enough all of a sudden. I think it has to do with Mou himself. Absolute ridiculous to sell him to United. Maybe it wont haunt Chelsea this season but it surely will haunt them in the near future.
posted on 22/1/14
Sunderland deserve an equaliser
posted on 22/1/14
Muriel needs to little bit grow up
posted on 22/1/14
Stupid comment. You have no idea what Mourinho's thought process is over this deal (that's if it does go through) so you can't possibly claim that he's being short termist.
-------
That's what it looks like from the outside, you clown. Unless there is a clause to get Rooney which I don't think there is, makes zero sense from Chelsea perspective.
posted on 22/1/14
ffs Ref
posted on 22/1/14
Don't get me wrong, Gunnethru, I agree with you about Mata's ability and that but I'm sure Mourinho does have a plan.
Chelsea with Mata or Chelsea with a £30m-£40m striker, which is better? That's what Mourinho may be thinking...
posted on 22/1/14
should have been a foul red card
posted on 22/1/14
Balotelli is a bit leave it
posted on 22/1/14
comment by 50Mill (U1147)
posted 28 seconds ago
Stupid comment. You have no idea what Mourinho's thought process is over this deal (that's if it does go through) so you can't possibly claim that he's being short termist.
-------
That's what it looks like from the outside, you clown. Unless there is a clause to get Rooney which I don't think there is, makes zero sense from Chelsea perspective.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
It can only look like that if you completely fail to take an objective look at the deal. Chelsea are potentially £40m up without weakening their first 11 at all, with a chance to bring in players who can actually improve their team in the places they are actually weak.
posted on 22/1/14
oh my word close
posted on 22/1/14
Reckon this Milan game is so much better
posted on 22/1/14
comment by Grant Hanley versus the Universe (U3522)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by 50Mill (U1147)
posted 28 seconds ago
Stupid comment. You have no idea what Mourinho's thought process is over this deal (that's if it does go through) so you can't possibly claim that he's being short termist.
-------
That's what it looks like from the outside, you clown. Unless there is a clause to get Rooney which I don't think there is, makes zero sense from Chelsea perspective.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
It can only look like that if you completely fail to take an objective look at the deal. Chelsea are potentially £40m up without weakening their first 11 at all, with a chance to bring in players who can actually improve their team in the places they are actually weak.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But you don't sell a player of Mata's quality to anyone. They could easily have offered him to anywhere in Europe and they could take £35mill or so instead of £40mill from utd, and that would be more of an advantage.
posted on 22/1/14
Cattermole showing Welbeck a clean pair of heels
posted on 22/1/14
ffs muriel
posted on 22/1/14
Stupid comment. You have no idea what Mourinho's thought process is over this deal (that's if it does go through) so you can't possibly claim that he's being short termist.
________________________
I doubt the guy has any longterm plans. The deal shows that. Mata is a proven PL League player and showed his class already. Buying someone new is always a risk.
Page 1198 of 40304
1199 | 1200 | 1201 | 1202 | 1203