or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 94 comments are related to an article called:

New acting chairman for Rangers & AGM

Page 2 of 4

posted on 7/11/13

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 7/11/13

A club like ours does not deserve negative moaning for the sake of moaning supporters like you
------------------------------------------------------------------------
You sound as if you're quite happy with the way the club is being run......are you ?

comment by (U18809)

posted on 7/11/13

I thought that was what the agm was for , to let shareholders vote on who the correct people are to take us forward .

Spivs out banners at Ibrox really do make me cringe.

posted on 7/11/13

for startes the people behind blue pitch and marg holdings should be made known to all

there should be proper corporate governance of the club rather than a finance director who cant tell the difference between club money and ipo money

comment by (U18809)

posted on 7/11/13

You sound as if you're quite happy with the way the club is being run......are you
.........................................................................

Not at all , but I like to remind myself how I felt 18months ago

If I had the choice between not having a club and having one being run as it is just now , then id take how things are just now all day long

Of course we need change , but for me that is what the agm is for.


posted on 7/11/13

thought that was what the agm was for , to let shareholders vote on who the correct people are to take us forward .

Spivs out banners at Ibrox really do make me cringe.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
That's a bit like saying General Elections are for the people to decide .....so the parties shouldn't campaign . People need to know the strength of feeling of the supporters, these people who ahve put our club , once again, in danger, are spivs , we want them out ....where's the problem with telling them?
Unless , of course, you want these guys to remain in control ! Do you ?

posted on 7/11/13

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by (U18809)

posted on 7/11/13

for startes the people behind blue pitch and marg holdings should be made known to all
.........................................................................................

Are there any legal grounds for people who want to remain anonymous to have their identity made public?

The new board , whatever that is made up of should know who these people are , but the general public have no right do know

posted on 7/11/13

If I had the choice between not having a club and having one being run as it is just now , then id take how things are just now all day long.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't you realise that our club is heading , again, to admin, so you're contentment may be very short lived !

posted on 7/11/13

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by (U18809)

posted on 7/11/13

I think Copeland is either a timposter or a dim poster


/.................................................................................

I think you should know how to spell the name of one of our stands at Ibrox.

coop

what spivs do you want out? They have already gone!

posted on 7/11/13

One thing is certain fellahs, as with wind, this AGM is better oot than in

Once it has passed surely your club will have a tad more clarity and allow you to plan for the future under whoever wins the day or am I being optimistic, and will the AGM decide all the important stuff?

If it is allowed to roll on then what has all the arguing prior to it been about?

posted on 7/11/13

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 7/11/13

copland is def a timposter

Rangers supporters should have every right to know who is behind the major shareholders in our club

alot of fans are shareholder themselves

considering 40 million has been spunked away by this current board, we have every fakin right to demand to know where its went and who is behind the faceless investors

posted on 7/11/13

Are there any legal grounds for people who want to remain anonymous to have their identity made public?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
YES, there is a section of the Companies Act that says that if 10% of shareholders agree ...they have to declare.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The new board , whatever that is made up of should know who these people are , but the general public have no right do know
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
So if Ian Brady was behind Blue Pitch...you'd give your money ?????!!!

comment by (U18809)

posted on 7/11/13

comment by meuandcoop (U5293)
posted 3 minutes ago
If I had the choice between not having a club and having one being run as it is just now , then id take how things are just now all day long.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't you realise that our club is heading , again, to admin, so you're contentment may be very short lived !
----------------------------------------------------------------------
if that's what it takes then so be it

We will not be short of potential buyers if that does happen , then we can see if murray and McColl really want the club

posted on 7/11/13

Super, I agree, corporate law may well say that they don't have to reveal who they are but ffs, what do they hope to acheive by staying in the shadows?

Fitba clubs are not the same as other businesses and if they do not come forward and let you know who they are then I would worry about exactly that, Who are they?

posted on 7/11/13

coop

what spivs do you want out? They have already gone!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Well, Stockbridge would be a start, probably the Easdales since they have shown support for Green and depending who is behind Blue Pitch and Margarita.....them too !

posted on 7/11/13

if that's what it takes then so be it

We will not be short of potential buyers if that does happen , then we can see if murray and McColl really want the club
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That confirms it for me....you're a Timposter. No true Rangers fan would want the club to go back into Admin, no way no how !

comment by (U18809)

posted on 7/11/13

coop

if that is a legal requirement then we will soon find out , no need for spivs out banners if the law is on the side of the shareholders.

posted on 7/11/13

Copland, Admin appeared to be very painful for your support and judging by all the WUMs on here was equally enjoyable for some of us Tims, surely going doon that road again is a step to far?

posted on 7/11/13

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 7/11/13

What about me Zack




posted on 7/11/13

Zach, you might have found your very own Richiebhoy

comment by (U18809)

posted on 7/11/13

That confirms it for me....you're a Timposter. No true Rangers fan would want the club to go back into Admin, no way no how
................................................................

Listen , if we need to take a few steps back to get us on a level footing then this is the season to do it given that we will still win the title with the admin points penalty.

Keep your timposter nonsense

Page 2 of 4

Sign in if you want to comment