posted 46 seconds ago
He said in his final summing up that all celtic fans were vile and ugly

And obsessed but the sfa took it down

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Did he?

U got a link?

Mibee to do with no longer being in spl?

Lawwell laughs at Rangers, Lawwell laughs at Rangers nah-na-na-nah nah-na-na-nah.

"comment by timmy (U14278)
posted 2 hours, 1 minute ago
So why did he say rangers as a club ceased to exist as per the spl rules?
"

Fkn hell

Ill try that again, fkn laptop





"comment by timmy (U14278)
posted 2 hours, 1 minute ago
So why did he say rangers as a club ceased to exist as per the spl rules?"





Did he?

U got a link?

Mibee to do with no longer being in spl?

What has become of Oldco?

It will be recalled that in Article 2 "Club" is defined in terms of "the undertaking of an association football club", and in Rule I1 it is defined in terms of an association football club which is, for the time being, eligible to participate in the League, and includes the owner and operator of such Club. Taking these definitions together, the SPL and its members have provided, by contract, that a Club is an undertaking which is capable of being owned and operated. While it no doubtdepends on individual circumstances what exactly is comprised in the undertaking of any particular Club, it would at the least comprise its name, the contracts with its players, its manager and other staff, and its ground, even though these may change from time to time. In common speech a Club is treated as a recognisable entity which is capable of being owned and operated, and which continues in existence despite its transfer to another owner and operator. In legal terms, it appears to us to be no different from any other undertaking which is capable of being carried on, bought and sold. This is not to say that a Club has legal personality, separate from and additional to the legal personality of its owner and operator. We are satisfied that it does not, and Mr McKenzie did not seek to argue otherwise.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted 1 minute ago
What has become of Oldco?

Ask an obsessed tim they know hunners

Bear in mind rangers had no representation at that hearing, rangers refused to take part in it, mr mckenzie(celtics lawyer) did not seek to argue

You still there timmy show us a sign, two bumps will do

If Peter Lawwell wants corroboration for his comments, not that this is necessary, he need look no further than the decision of Judge Bishopp in the directions hearing in July preparatory to the full UTT hearing on the liquidated Rangers’ tax case early next year.

He wrote :-
“As is well known, RFC collapsed into administration in March 2012, followed by liquidation in October 2012. It has been re-named RFC 2012 plc. The greater part of its business, and with it most of its assets, were purchased from the administrators in June 2012 by Sevco Scotland Ltd, which has since been re-named The Rangers Football Club Ltd.
Although the professional football team known as Rangers had played in the Scottish Premier League until 2012, the collapse led to the ejection of the team from that league, and a team known as Rangers now plays in the Scottish Third Division. ”

There you have it – “a team known as Rangers” – not “Rangers”, not “The Rangers”, not “the most successful club in the world….”.

The business was bought, the assets were bought – just like any other fire sale on a liquidation. The club died, the company died, end of.

Don't worry they wont clear their debt, its not the rangers way.


We dont have any, we are debt free

As is well known, RFC collapsed into administration in March 2012, followed by liquidation in October 2012. It has been re-named RFC 2012 plc. The greater part of its business, and with it most of its assets, were purchased from the administrators in June 2012 by Sevco Scotland Ltd, which has since been re-named The Rangers Football Club Ltd.

Lost all credibility mex, wrong dates bud, try again

comment by Laudrup (U12366)
posted 32 seconds ago


Don't worry they wont clear their debt, its not the rangers way.


We dont have any, we are debt free
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who are debt free?

I think you will find TRFC owe a shitload of cash to RIFC Plc.

It will be recalled that in Article 2 "Club" is defined in terms of "the undertaking of an association football club", and in Rule I1 it is defined in terms of an association football club which is, for the time being, eligible to participate in the League, and includes the owner and operator of such Club. Taking these definitions together, the SPL and its members have provided, by contract, that a Club is an undertaking which is capable of being owned and operated. While it no doubtdepends on individual circumstances what exactly is comprised in the undertaking of any particular Club, it would at the least comprise its name, the contracts with its players, its manager and other staff, and its ground, even though these may change from time to time. In common speech a Club is treated as a recognisable entity which is capable of being owned and operated, and which continues in existence despite its transfer to another owner and operator. In legal terms, it appears to us to be no different from any other undertaking which is capable of being carried on, bought and sold. This is not to say that a Club has legal personality, separate from and additional to the legal personality of its owner and operator. We are satisfied that it does not, and Mr McKenzie did not seek to argue otherwise.

There you go mex, sook it up

I think you will find TRFC owe a shitload of cash to RIFC Plc.

Debt free get used to it or get therapy

Keeper

TRFC soon to be dead.

It will be recalled that in Article 2 "Club" is defined in terms of "the undertaking of an association football club", and in Rule I1 it is defined in terms of an association football club which is, for the time being, eligible to participate in the League, and includes the owner and operator of such Club. Taking these definitions together, the SPL and its members have provided, by contract, that a Club is an undertaking which is capable of being owned and operated. While it no doubtdepends on individual circumstances what exactly is comprised in the undertaking of any particular Club, it would at the least comprise its name, the contracts with its players, its manager and other staff, and its ground, even though these may change from time to time. In common speech a Club is treated as a recognisable entity which is capable of being owned and operated, and which continues in existence despite its transfer to another owner and operator. In legal terms, it appears to us to be no different from any other undertaking which is capable of being carried on, bought and sold. This is not to say that a Club has legal personality, separate from and additional to the legal personality of its owner and operator. We are satisfied that it does not, and Mr McKenzie did not seek to argue otherwise.

Just for you mex

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Any bears got a link to where he said you are the same club?

Well there you go "known"


Too many mushys

posted 33 seconds ago
Any bears got a link to where he said you are the same club?


Aye but the spl removed it

Timmy are you struggling with article 2