Yeah I'm sure you were told it was ok to divulge that information pile of bull muck

Did you ask him how the hell he thought your club would comply with FFP, what with such charitable acts as keeping a poor footballer in work who otherwise would've fallen below the bread line AND complying with Billy's wishlist....... That would've been a more interesting read

The author of the aticle has stated it wasn't him who was there; pointless asking him

At full time Jim attributed all 3 goals to Harding's poor positional play.
-------------------------------



The first goal : he wasn't out of position. Just didn't tackle McCleary.

Did you ask him why he thought the 2nd goal was Harding's fault then?

The cross came in from the opposite side to Harding and I think it was Lascelles who was marking Gorkks, the scorer

I don't want to doubt for one minute you had a meal with Jim Price, but, after all the secrecy the club are maintaining, I'd like to know why he'd want you to share all of that with us when the club don't even share it with the press.

and I quote you : "Not saying it's true but no real reason for it not to be. If it is true, it's quite an interesting insight and makes some sense tbh........"

Why tell you lies and then let you tell us all this? Just doesn't make sense


Hope you recover from your illness

Ah.. misread that bit Strett

Still find it strange though. I'm not convinced

Sorry Strett you are right I realised the author of the article wasn't there after I posted. However, who ever it doesn't detract from the fact that it's clearly a pile of poo. Nobody in their right mind is going to say Fazwaz did this he was responsible for that, would be clear lack of unity!!

At full time Jim attributed all 3 goals to Harding's poor positional play.

What worth has his opinion? None, nada, zip.
I would put as much credance to Queeny, the tea ladies assessment of the match.

It wasn't Queeny's fault!

She was asked to prepare the bath for Harding at half-time!

How the hell can it be her fault?

... ooops sorry misread that too.

As stated, I did not write this or say it is true. I find it hard to believe Price would be happy for this to be made public but then I find it hard to believe a lot of things him and Billy do. Just passing on something I read.

Have to admit, this is a bit suspicious and I do not think they would slag off the players who were on the pitch at that moment, regardless of what they thought of them.

Eraser

I find it hard Davies would attack the NEP photographer in public (Milwall game). Ok, he might have an issue with them but he had a press pass and I believe is allowed to take any photo that he wishes.

Although this guy was working for the NEP on the night he is freelance. He also was supplying free photos for the match day programme. Talk about cutting your supply off. I bet the match day programme editor will be in for some stick now too.

I raise the above because Davies and the club are trying to cut as much info from us as possible and only report things on the official website or via Davies himself with Natalie Jackson interviews

It's disgusting how they treat the fans, absolutely contemptible

Nobody should be forced to watch Natalie Jackson do anything, ever.

This is just "Sitting on a plane from Glasgow to East Midlands II" - a complete fairy tale.

Anyone taken in by this should mind the gap - the one between their ears.

So easy to drag them into our conversations.

What a load of complete and utter bollox.

Webbo we are concerned for you Billy is in meltdown, his interview after the millwall game was embarrassing.

'There's a circus in the town
Billy Davies is a clown
Billy's on a meltdown ...

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

very very interesting

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

I may even find myself agreeing with SHH on this one; it has "Jom" written all over it!

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Sounds like sheep dis-information to me; the only part that may ring true concerns Tudgay imo.

The Tudgay part is as ridiculous as the rest.