comment by Mr Mercurial (U17162)
posted 2 hours, 38 minutes ago
Hype is a measurement, by how much I did not state mudd, im saying people say he's better than he is (many United fans do), by how much I have not stated! I'm just saying I should have included him from the start as he's a striker at a top club whose goal tally doesn't justify what some fans say about their ability
==============
No one rates Welbeck. That's the point I'm trying to make, including Utd fans
Nobody rates Torres, including Chelsea fans.
This is why us them have the best fans on 606, we can accept when we have a crap player in the team.
comment by ManUtdDaredevil (U9612)
posted 1 hour, 50 minutes ago
comment by Mr Mercurial (U17162)
posted 2 hours, 38 minutes ago
Hype is a measurement, by how much I did not state mudd, im saying people say he's better than he is (many United fans do), by how much I have not stated! I'm just saying I should have included him from the start as he's a striker at a top club whose goal tally doesn't justify what some fans say about their ability
==============
No one rates Welbeck. That's the point I'm trying to make, including Utd fans
--------------------
Go ask Macca and Robb, go on I dare you. You'll get a full blown Article off them and you know it, because idiots like those two definitely do rate him
"I've never understood the arsenal attacks on Hernandez.
they're the only club that don't seem to rate him"
A few idiots not rating Hernandez does not constitute as a whole fanbase.
I for one rate him highly.
What I find most amusing is that if Arsenal had a player like Hernandez, they would be contenders.
===
No, we wouldn't. He is a good player. Fairly quick and a good fox-in-the-box type of player, but he wouldn't lead us to silverware because he can't hold the ball up and doesn't have the strength or agility to play as a lone centre forward. I've been losing my patience with Giroud, but even I can see he can offer more than Hernandez in his all-round play. Hernandez is a better finisher than Giroud, though, and that's the main thing.
Giroud hasn't even played that badly in his last few games, but he just isn't enough of a goal threat. We need another striker desperately, although with Podolski coming back from injury, along with Bendtner still in the squad, I don't see it happening unfortunately.
I'd rather have Giroud than RVP or Rooney..
Hernandez is a super sub
When Giroud is having a rubbish day at the office, you bring him on and he pops the ball in the net (with his face, back of head, hip, whatever) and there's + 1 to 2 points to the tally
being a super sub who always seems to find a goal somehow does lead to silverware
Hernandez is very average as a starting striker but his ability to scoreas a sub is like gold dust to squad over a season
Hernandez scores more when he starts than off of the bench.
He's a good option to have in your squad as he can make the difference from the bench but when he does start games he also scores, he doesn't need to play regularly to find his goal scoring touch, and it's a valuable asset to have in your squad.
He wouldn't massively improve Arsenal as a first choice striker but would improve their squad, for sure.
Its what Solsjkaer used to do.. I think it was him who said that he used to analyse weaknesses in the opposition whilst the game was going on so if he was called upon, he would be ready to go and exploit them. Sign of an intelligent player.
Yeah that's true, Mr. C.
The difference is that Ole was a much better footballer than Hernandez, though. He played on the right wing quite a lot after Beckham left and did well there, can you imagine Hernandez playing on the right wing?
it'd be funny to just watch him on the wing darren atleast once
It'd be an improvement on Welbeck.
Sign in if you want to comment
soldado v giroud v torres
Page 3 of 3
posted on 23/12/13
comment by Mr Mercurial (U17162)
posted 2 hours, 38 minutes ago
Hype is a measurement, by how much I did not state mudd, im saying people say he's better than he is (many United fans do), by how much I have not stated! I'm just saying I should have included him from the start as he's a striker at a top club whose goal tally doesn't justify what some fans say about their ability
==============
No one rates Welbeck. That's the point I'm trying to make, including Utd fans
posted on 23/12/13
Nobody rates Torres, including Chelsea fans.
This is why us them have the best fans on 606, we can accept when we have a crap player in the team.
posted on 23/12/13
comment by ManUtdDaredevil (U9612)
posted 1 hour, 50 minutes ago
comment by Mr Mercurial (U17162)
posted 2 hours, 38 minutes ago
Hype is a measurement, by how much I did not state mudd, im saying people say he's better than he is (many United fans do), by how much I have not stated! I'm just saying I should have included him from the start as he's a striker at a top club whose goal tally doesn't justify what some fans say about their ability
==============
No one rates Welbeck. That's the point I'm trying to make, including Utd fans
--------------------
Go ask Macca and Robb, go on I dare you. You'll get a full blown Article off them and you know it, because idiots like those two definitely do rate him
posted on 23/12/13
"I've never understood the arsenal attacks on Hernandez.
they're the only club that don't seem to rate him"
A few idiots not rating Hernandez does not constitute as a whole fanbase.
I for one rate him highly.
posted on 23/12/13
What I find most amusing is that if Arsenal had a player like Hernandez, they would be contenders.
===
No, we wouldn't. He is a good player. Fairly quick and a good fox-in-the-box type of player, but he wouldn't lead us to silverware because he can't hold the ball up and doesn't have the strength or agility to play as a lone centre forward. I've been losing my patience with Giroud, but even I can see he can offer more than Hernandez in his all-round play. Hernandez is a better finisher than Giroud, though, and that's the main thing.
Giroud hasn't even played that badly in his last few games, but he just isn't enough of a goal threat. We need another striker desperately, although with Podolski coming back from injury, along with Bendtner still in the squad, I don't see it happening unfortunately.
posted on 23/12/13
I'd rather have Giroud than RVP or Rooney..
posted on 23/12/13
Hernandez is a super sub
When Giroud is having a rubbish day at the office, you bring him on and he pops the ball in the net (with his face, back of head, hip, whatever) and there's + 1 to 2 points to the tally
being a super sub who always seems to find a goal somehow does lead to silverware
posted on 23/12/13
Hernandez is very average as a starting striker but his ability to scoreas a sub is like gold dust to squad over a season
posted on 23/12/13
Hernandez scores more when he starts than off of the bench.
He's a good option to have in your squad as he can make the difference from the bench but when he does start games he also scores, he doesn't need to play regularly to find his goal scoring touch, and it's a valuable asset to have in your squad.
He wouldn't massively improve Arsenal as a first choice striker but would improve their squad, for sure.
posted on 23/12/13
Its what Solsjkaer used to do.. I think it was him who said that he used to analyse weaknesses in the opposition whilst the game was going on so if he was called upon, he would be ready to go and exploit them. Sign of an intelligent player.
posted on 23/12/13
Yeah that's true, Mr. C.
The difference is that Ole was a much better footballer than Hernandez, though. He played on the right wing quite a lot after Beckham left and did well there, can you imagine Hernandez playing on the right wing?
posted on 23/12/13
it'd be funny to just watch him on the wing darren atleast once
posted on 23/12/13
It'd be an improvement on Welbeck.
posted on 23/12/13
Vela
Page 3 of 3