Yes to Siggs and if Verts was £25m+ then yes.
All this season's signings still need time before "cutting our losses".
Wouldn't be a loss on Holtby (£3m profit?) but no way.
Who says we're cutting our losses?
We had 7 new players in, we have a new manager and starting to look like the team is beginning to gel and play a bit. The least we should do is give them time to prove themselves, or should we have ditched Modric when he took time to settle?
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
WTF is this article all about. Why would Spurs want to sell all or most of their first team. What a bollox of an article.
Why don`t Spurs just sell the fecccking club, and build another supermarket on the site.
Townsend? Yes. The rest? No.
WTF is this article all about. Why would Spurs want to sell all or most of their first team. What a bollox of an article.
----
Sorry Devon, I couldn't put it better myself!
No offence meant or anything....
Lemela £18m-NO
Capoue £5m-NO
Holtby £5m-POSSIBLY
Townsend £7m-NO
Vertonghen £20m-NO
Soldado £14m-NO
Sigurdsson £7m-POSSIBLY
Paulinho £12m-NO
Erikssen £10m-NO
Non of the above, but I would gladly sell Naughton for £35m though
Soldado, Eriksen and Lamela are all worth under 5 Million
No offence Devonshire, but if Spurs sold that lot, they may as well just go straight to the championship.
Lemela £18m = no
Capoue £5m = no
Holtby £5m = no
Townsend £7m = yes
Vertonghen £20m = add 5m then yes
Soldado £14m = dunno
Sigurdsson £7m = dunno
Paulinho £12m = no
Erikssen £10m =no way!
If we were to sell Townsend I'd hope we could get 10m plus. He's young and British so could see him being attractive to a number of clubs. We sold Caulker for 9m who was in my opinion an inferior player.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
you wouldnt get half the quoted amounts for that pile of dross
comment by sandy_brown (U13619)
posted 2 hours, 52 minutes ago
WTF is this article all about. Why would Spurs want to sell all or most of their first team. What a bollox of an article.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Coming from the King of Bollox articles i guess you know what you're talking about Sandy
Most of you are misunderstanding the article.
What I am saying is if an offer came in for any of these players at the value stated, would you take it or not?
I am not promoting that we sell all these players, or any of them, I am not saying they are no good and need to go JUST would you entertain offers at this level ??
I think the words 'cut our losses' probably weren't the right ones then Devon
Why are people even considering the idea of selling Townsend? He's a decent LW, has good pace and and ability to beat the first defender,He is still young and will hopefully improve.We need him in the team/squad.( just not out on the right wing)
It's the wording you used. Would be strange to "cut our losses" with players who've done well.
I think its something to do with being home grown.
OK he's too keen on shooting from distance but if we'd paid good money for him we would be saying he was an exciting raw talent who just needs to get a better understanding of the PL and the team.
Before his injury he was starting to show signs that his overall game was improving, and that he had an ability to cross and make incisive passes. I wouldn't sell him as we will need him as cover for Lennon at the very least.
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
If we were offered the following.....
Page 1 of 1
posted on 9/1/14
Yes to Siggs and if Verts was £25m+ then yes.
All this season's signings still need time before "cutting our losses".
posted on 9/1/14
Wouldn't be a loss on Holtby (£3m profit?) but no way.
posted on 9/1/14
definitely not!
posted on 9/1/14
Who says we're cutting our losses?
We had 7 new players in, we have a new manager and starting to look like the team is beginning to gel and play a bit. The least we should do is give them time to prove themselves, or should we have ditched Modric when he took time to settle?
posted on 9/1/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 9/1/14
WTF is this article all about. Why would Spurs want to sell all or most of their first team. What a bollox of an article.
Why don`t Spurs just sell the fecccking club, and build another supermarket on the site.
posted on 9/1/14
Townsend? Yes. The rest? No.
posted on 9/1/14
WTF is this article all about. Why would Spurs want to sell all or most of their first team. What a bollox of an article.
----
Sorry Devon, I couldn't put it better myself!
No offence meant or anything....
posted on 9/1/14
Lemela £18m-NO
Capoue £5m-NO
Holtby £5m-POSSIBLY
Townsend £7m-NO
Vertonghen £20m-NO
Soldado £14m-NO
Sigurdsson £7m-POSSIBLY
Paulinho £12m-NO
Erikssen £10m-NO
posted on 9/1/14
Wouldn't sell anyone
posted on 9/1/14
Non of the above, but I would gladly sell Naughton for £35m though
posted on 9/1/14
Soldado, Eriksen and Lamela are all worth under 5 Million
posted on 9/1/14
No offence Devonshire, but if Spurs sold that lot, they may as well just go straight to the championship.
posted on 9/1/14
Lemela £18m = no
Capoue £5m = no
Holtby £5m = no
Townsend £7m = yes
Vertonghen £20m = add 5m then yes
Soldado £14m = dunno
Sigurdsson £7m = dunno
Paulinho £12m = no
Erikssen £10m =no way!
posted on 9/1/14
If we were to sell Townsend I'd hope we could get 10m plus. He's young and British so could see him being attractive to a number of clubs. We sold Caulker for 9m who was in my opinion an inferior player.
posted on 9/1/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 9/1/14
you wouldnt get half the quoted amounts for that pile of dross
posted on 9/1/14
comment by sandy_brown (U13619)
posted 2 hours, 52 minutes ago
WTF is this article all about. Why would Spurs want to sell all or most of their first team. What a bollox of an article.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Coming from the King of Bollox articles i guess you know what you're talking about Sandy
Most of you are misunderstanding the article.
What I am saying is if an offer came in for any of these players at the value stated, would you take it or not?
I am not promoting that we sell all these players, or any of them, I am not saying they are no good and need to go JUST would you entertain offers at this level ??
posted on 9/1/14
I think the words 'cut our losses' probably weren't the right ones then Devon
posted on 9/1/14
Why are people even considering the idea of selling Townsend? He's a decent LW, has good pace and and ability to beat the first defender,He is still young and will hopefully improve.We need him in the team/squad.( just not out on the right wing)
posted on 9/1/14
It's the wording you used. Would be strange to "cut our losses" with players who've done well.
posted on 9/1/14
I think its something to do with being home grown.
OK he's too keen on shooting from distance but if we'd paid good money for him we would be saying he was an exciting raw talent who just needs to get a better understanding of the PL and the team.
Before his injury he was starting to show signs that his overall game was improving, and that he had an ability to cross and make incisive passes. I wouldn't sell him as we will need him as cover for Lennon at the very least.
Page 1 of 1