Bluedroog moaning about blind loyalties before proceeding to only point out what Arsenal fans have been saying. So I take it that it's not your fault that you had a rubbish manager or that we beat you 5-3.
This article is making the point that Mourinho doesn't actually have that great a league record against us. He usually fears Arsenal and so sets out to defend and hope to nick a goal. That's not that contentious.
comment by Stuck With The Name Biggish (U7916)
posted 2 seconds ago
Might as well say Arsenal only won because of RVP's hat trick...
some silly people on here
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tbf, comments like this were the most ridiculous for me :
"Arsenal's wins against us have all been very lucky.
5-3 JT slip and AVB shocking manager
3-1 at Emirates Scolari shocking coach "
It's nothing to do with luck, that you guys appointed dross to manage you.
Giro - Yes some of those are ridiculous too but that's not my job....
I agree, i can't remember any unjust results between our two dies in many a year now.........
Same can't be said about us and United though, both ways we seem to have results affected by match offcials
He usually fears Arsenal and so sets out to defend and hope to nick a goal. That's not that contentious.
----------------------------------------
He deosn't fear anyone, he just knows the best way to beat Arsenal and its been proven in the last ten years to be correct, whoever the Chelsea manager is.
This season was no different, ok we lack the quality up front to hurt you this season, but the amounts of times we caught you on the break 4 agst 3 just proves this is the way to beat Arsenal...
also, we have won at the Emirates this season...
even the 0-0 we created the better chances that game
Biggish
think most of this lot had too
comment by Stuck With The Name Biggish (U7916)
posted 24 minutes ago
He usually fears Arsenal and so sets out to defend and hope to nick a goal. That's not that contentious.
----------------------------------------
This season was no different, ok we lack the quality up front to hurt you this season, but the amounts of times we caught you on the break 4 agst 3 just proves this is the way to beat Arsenal...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How come you lack the quality up front when your front 3 of Torres, Hazard and Willian cost a combined 112 million?
How come you lack the quality up front when your front 3 of Torres, Hazard and Willian cost a combined 112 million?
---------------------------------------------------
Stuckish
March made a perfectly valid point. Why scoff at it?
I think given Chelsea were certainly a team in transition when he took over and not playing all that well at the beginning of the season Jose was completely correct to play for a draw at United and then Arsenal. Had we gone out to win those games we’d likely have lost, Mourinho has taken shared the spoils away to title rivals (ok United turned out not to be but we played them early), he’ll more often than not hold rivals to a point in their backyard and play for 3 points at home, that is where the league can be won or lost so given the way we were playing at that time very sensible.
If we can take four points from title rivals and restrict them to one then that is a good return. The team is already playing much better and is drilled far better, has balance now with Matic and will no doubt be improved upon in the summer with a striker. Next year when we win at Arsenal you’ll regret we are no longer playing for a drawer.
I know you’d like a Chelsea not at their best to go gung-ho and leave them self exposed but why would we play to your strengths? I can tell you are frustrated but we’ll continue to play in the way that suits us, it is up to you to do something about it, I’d guess more times than not you can’t and we’ll come out on top.
How come you lack the quality up front when your front 3 of Torres, Hazard and Willian cost a combined 112 million?
---------------------------------------------------
===
How about answering the question properly rather than avoiding it with a childish smiley face?
If you can't debate, then get lost.
Its such a stupid question, honestly if that is your thought process that it needs an aswer i can't be feckin bothered...
comment by Stuck With The Name Biggish (U7916)
posted 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
Its such a stupid question, honestly if that is your thought process that it needs an aswer i can't be feckin bothered...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's a legit question.
You've spent a nearly obscene money to build your squad. This very fact itself invalidates any excuses about your supposed lack of quality up front. You can't have multi-million players in the squad AND whine about lack of quality.
Sign in if you want to comment
Mourinho Consistently Bests Wenger
Page 2 of 2
posted on 22/1/14
Bluedroog moaning about blind loyalties before proceeding to only point out what Arsenal fans have been saying. So I take it that it's not your fault that you had a rubbish manager or that we beat you 5-3.
This article is making the point that Mourinho doesn't actually have that great a league record against us. He usually fears Arsenal and so sets out to defend and hope to nick a goal. That's not that contentious.
posted on 22/1/14
comment by Stuck With The Name Biggish (U7916)
posted 2 seconds ago
Might as well say Arsenal only won because of RVP's hat trick...
some silly people on here
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tbf, comments like this were the most ridiculous for me :
"Arsenal's wins against us have all been very lucky.
5-3 JT slip and AVB shocking manager
3-1 at Emirates Scolari shocking coach "
It's nothing to do with luck, that you guys appointed dross to manage you.
posted on 22/1/14
Giro - Yes some of those are ridiculous too but that's not my job....
posted on 22/1/14
I agree, i can't remember any unjust results between our two dies in many a year now.........
Same can't be said about us and United though, both ways we seem to have results affected by match offcials
posted on 22/1/14
He usually fears Arsenal and so sets out to defend and hope to nick a goal. That's not that contentious.
----------------------------------------
He deosn't fear anyone, he just knows the best way to beat Arsenal and its been proven in the last ten years to be correct, whoever the Chelsea manager is.
This season was no different, ok we lack the quality up front to hurt you this season, but the amounts of times we caught you on the break 4 agst 3 just proves this is the way to beat Arsenal...
posted on 22/1/14
also, we have won at the Emirates this season...
even the 0-0 we created the better chances that game
posted on 22/1/14
forgot about that win
posted on 22/1/14
Biggish
think most of this lot had too
posted on 22/1/14
comment by Stuck With The Name Biggish (U7916)
posted 24 minutes ago
He usually fears Arsenal and so sets out to defend and hope to nick a goal. That's not that contentious.
----------------------------------------
This season was no different, ok we lack the quality up front to hurt you this season, but the amounts of times we caught you on the break 4 agst 3 just proves this is the way to beat Arsenal...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How come you lack the quality up front when your front 3 of Torres, Hazard and Willian cost a combined 112 million?
posted on 22/1/14
How come you lack the quality up front when your front 3 of Torres, Hazard and Willian cost a combined 112 million?
---------------------------------------------------
posted on 22/1/14
Stuckish
March made a perfectly valid point. Why scoff at it?
posted on 22/1/14
I think given Chelsea were certainly a team in transition when he took over and not playing all that well at the beginning of the season Jose was completely correct to play for a draw at United and then Arsenal. Had we gone out to win those games we’d likely have lost, Mourinho has taken shared the spoils away to title rivals (ok United turned out not to be but we played them early), he’ll more often than not hold rivals to a point in their backyard and play for 3 points at home, that is where the league can be won or lost so given the way we were playing at that time very sensible.
If we can take four points from title rivals and restrict them to one then that is a good return. The team is already playing much better and is drilled far better, has balance now with Matic and will no doubt be improved upon in the summer with a striker. Next year when we win at Arsenal you’ll regret we are no longer playing for a drawer.
I know you’d like a Chelsea not at their best to go gung-ho and leave them self exposed but why would we play to your strengths? I can tell you are frustrated but we’ll continue to play in the way that suits us, it is up to you to do something about it, I’d guess more times than not you can’t and we’ll come out on top.
posted on 22/1/14
How come you lack the quality up front when your front 3 of Torres, Hazard and Willian cost a combined 112 million?
---------------------------------------------------
===
How about answering the question properly rather than avoiding it with a childish smiley face?
If you can't debate, then get lost.
posted on 22/1/14
Its such a stupid question, honestly if that is your thought process that it needs an aswer i can't be feckin bothered...
posted on 22/1/14
comment by Stuck With The Name Biggish (U7916)
posted 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
Its such a stupid question, honestly if that is your thought process that it needs an aswer i can't be feckin bothered...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's a legit question.
You've spent a nearly obscene money to build your squad. This very fact itself invalidates any excuses about your supposed lack of quality up front. You can't have multi-million players in the squad AND whine about lack of quality.
Page 2 of 2