or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 11 comments are related to an article called:

Starting 11

Page 1 of 1

comment by Tyke (U9181)

posted on 3/2/14

True, but if Wenger wasnt so obsessed with MONEY our team would have cost a bit more, because there would be a world class forward in there.

comment by 8bit (U2653)

posted on 3/2/14

about £130m? and Ozil was about a 3rd of that

posted on 3/2/14

Ox would cost £70million now

comment by 8bit (U2653)

posted on 3/2/14

Tyke chelsea have spent about a billion since Abramovic came in and they don't even have a striker better than Giroud... we don't have a sugar daddy, we built a new stadium and Wenger made a team on a budget and is top above 2 oil money teams. legend

posted on 3/2/14

Ches - Free
Bacs - £5m I think from Aurex
Per - £8m
Kos - £8m
Monreal - £10,
Ozil - £42m
Ox - £15m
Arteta - £10m
Santi - £12-16m
Pod - £12m
Giroud - £11m

Total = £133-137m

Not bad

comment by Tyke (U9181)

posted on 3/2/14

If Bendnter plays, the value tops £400million.

posted on 3/2/14

no amount of money in the world could buy another team an Arsene Wenger, everyone else is inferior

comment by Tyke (U9181)

posted on 3/2/14

I agree 8bit, but would it have hurt him to just go that tiny bit further? The only deal he did this winter was for a free loan, and he is boasting about how we wont be playing his wages while he is injured..it makes me cringe!

posted on 3/2/14

You need to pay top money for top talent, Tyke

posted on 3/2/14

Also if you include Gibbs and Wilshere in the team which is likely, they were free, so you can reduce 10m and 15m from Monreal and Ox

comment by Tyke (U9181)

posted on 3/2/14

We were prepared to pay for Suarez in the summer. It isnt just a case of wanting top talent, average talent in case Giroud gets injured would have done for me! Still, if we go at City with the passion and conviction Chelsea showed tonight, we could beat em, there's always hope!

Page 1 of 1

Sign in if you want to comment