Comment deleted by Site Moderator
It's all there in black and white so suck it up tittylip87
A lot of money.
Sadly for them they are a club steeped in shame about it.
And if they do get 4th and hold on to Suarez they will claim that it was down to Rodgers and the 12th man.
Laffable!
People pay too much attention to spending statistics, they completely ignore context.
Aiden McGeady - £3.2 million
Eden Hazard - £32 million
=====
Laffable!
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Well that's because Hazard is ten times the player.
comment by righteous1 (U7048)
posted 9 minutes ago
I would have Henderson, Gerrard and Barkley personally.
Barkley has everything in his locker.
=======
Laffable!
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Darren The King Fletcher (U10026)
posted 11 minutes ago
People pay too much attention to spending statistics,
======
comment by The Sky is Red! (U18601)
posted 7 minutes ago
Yes i do rate barkley. Think he's going to be top grade. United should get the cheque book out ASAP.
Laffable !
And in what way is that related to what I've said?
comment by Darren The King Fletcher (U10026)
posted 12 seconds ago
And in what way is that related to what I've said?
===
Dazza come on.
You know it, Kate Upton knows it, I know it....
It'll take £100 million for United or Everton to stand a chance of taking the PL off the Oil Rigs.
That may be, but your response to what I said is still irrelevant, and I still believe that people pay far too much attention to spending statistics.
Take Arsenal, for example. If you look at their net spend since 2004 you'd think that it was a miracle that they've remained in the top four all that time.
But it ignores that they were the best team in England in 2004 and in a far greater position of strength than the teams beneath them that have outspent them.
comment by Sticky Toffees (U19150)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Darren The King Fletcher (U10026)
posted 12 seconds ago
And in what way is that related to what I've said?
===
Dazza come on.
You know it, Kate Upton knows it, I know it....
It'll take £100 million for United or Everton to stand a chance of taking the PL off the Oil Rigs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah well
But it ignores that they were the best team in England in 2004 and in a far greater position of strength than the teams beneath them that have outspent them.
====
That's silly.
Arsenal's transfer record pre Ozil was around £16 million for Arshavin or Reyes.
They were always going to get swallowed up with the type of big time spending around them like on Berbatov, Robhino, Torres.
Three mistakes right there that their clubs were able to swallow and carry on spending.
It's not silly. And you've just listed transfers made by teams that are above Arsenal not below them. Once again you are failing to make relevant points to what I'm saying.
Bar, City, of course, who were at the time below Arsenal. But they are a different kettle of fish to Arsenal and not relevant to the point I'm making.
You're such a sad woman Phillipa
Dazza
In 2004 Arsenal were already punching way above their weight.
You can't ignore it when a team like United breaks the bank for Ferdinand and Rooney and then eases off their spending - those players are STILL at the club and are getting better.
United and Chelsea then blew them away in the transfer market to such an extent that they left them behind.
Put it this way - if Everton got a £250 million kitty every year for the next three years, we would take the title.
As long as City and Chelsea only added by £50 million each year.
"Put it this way - if Everton got a £250 million kitty every year for the next three years, we would take the title."
probably not
For Chelsea it was 'easy'
For City it was harder
Then PSG and Monaco joined the party
With each added mega-billionaire owner it gets progressively more difficult as there are only so many top players to go around
If all clubs had owners like that then it wouldn't make any difference at all
Dr Phil is living, walking, talking pile of bitter
comment by lucas leiva really is that good! (U9282)
posted 9 minutes ago
Dr Phil is living, walking, talking pile of bitter
----------------------------------------------
Looks like personal insults are the order of the day for the RS on ja606 as they cannot dispute the facts as they stand.
no, just reiterating a FACT
The RS on the Everton board
The flock like sheeple to Phil and his wum posts....well done Phil
Sign in if you want to comment
How much you have to spend to win the
Page 1 of 3
posted on 9/2/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 9/2/14
It's all there in black and white so suck it up tittylip87
posted on 9/2/14
A lot of money.
Sadly for them they are a club steeped in shame about it.
And if they do get 4th and hold on to Suarez they will claim that it was down to Rodgers and the 12th man.
Laffable!
posted on 9/2/14
People pay too much attention to spending statistics, they completely ignore context.
posted on 9/2/14
posted on 9/2/14
Aiden McGeady - £3.2 million
Eden Hazard - £32 million
=====
Laffable!
posted on 9/2/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 9/2/14
Well that's because Hazard is ten times the player.
posted on 9/2/14
comment by righteous1 (U7048)
posted 9 minutes ago
I would have Henderson, Gerrard and Barkley personally.
Barkley has everything in his locker.
=======
Laffable!
posted on 9/2/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 9/2/14
comment by Darren The King Fletcher (U10026)
posted 11 minutes ago
People pay too much attention to spending statistics,
======
comment by The Sky is Red! (U18601)
posted 7 minutes ago
Yes i do rate barkley. Think he's going to be top grade. United should get the cheque book out ASAP.
Laffable !
posted on 9/2/14
And in what way is that related to what I've said?
posted on 9/2/14
comment by Darren The King Fletcher (U10026)
posted 12 seconds ago
And in what way is that related to what I've said?
===
Dazza come on.
You know it, Kate Upton knows it, I know it....
It'll take £100 million for United or Everton to stand a chance of taking the PL off the Oil Rigs.
posted on 9/2/14
That may be, but your response to what I said is still irrelevant, and I still believe that people pay far too much attention to spending statistics.
Take Arsenal, for example. If you look at their net spend since 2004 you'd think that it was a miracle that they've remained in the top four all that time.
But it ignores that they were the best team in England in 2004 and in a far greater position of strength than the teams beneath them that have outspent them.
posted on 9/2/14
comment by Sticky Toffees (U19150)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Darren The King Fletcher (U10026)
posted 12 seconds ago
And in what way is that related to what I've said?
===
Dazza come on.
You know it, Kate Upton knows it, I know it....
It'll take £100 million for United or Everton to stand a chance of taking the PL off the Oil Rigs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah well
posted on 9/2/14
But it ignores that they were the best team in England in 2004 and in a far greater position of strength than the teams beneath them that have outspent them.
====
That's silly.
Arsenal's transfer record pre Ozil was around £16 million for Arshavin or Reyes.
They were always going to get swallowed up with the type of big time spending around them like on Berbatov, Robhino, Torres.
Three mistakes right there that their clubs were able to swallow and carry on spending.
posted on 9/2/14
It's not silly. And you've just listed transfers made by teams that are above Arsenal not below them. Once again you are failing to make relevant points to what I'm saying.
posted on 9/2/14
Bar, City, of course, who were at the time below Arsenal. But they are a different kettle of fish to Arsenal and not relevant to the point I'm making.
posted on 9/2/14
You're such a sad woman Phillipa
posted on 9/2/14
Dazza
In 2004 Arsenal were already punching way above their weight.
You can't ignore it when a team like United breaks the bank for Ferdinand and Rooney and then eases off their spending - those players are STILL at the club and are getting better.
United and Chelsea then blew them away in the transfer market to such an extent that they left them behind.
Put it this way - if Everton got a £250 million kitty every year for the next three years, we would take the title.
As long as City and Chelsea only added by £50 million each year.
posted on 9/2/14
"Put it this way - if Everton got a £250 million kitty every year for the next three years, we would take the title."
probably not
For Chelsea it was 'easy'
For City it was harder
Then PSG and Monaco joined the party
With each added mega-billionaire owner it gets progressively more difficult as there are only so many top players to go around
If all clubs had owners like that then it wouldn't make any difference at all
posted on 9/2/14
Dr Phil is living, walking, talking pile of bitter
posted on 9/2/14
comment by lucas leiva really is that good! (U9282)
posted 9 minutes ago
Dr Phil is living, walking, talking pile of bitter
----------------------------------------------
Looks like personal insults are the order of the day for the RS on ja606 as they cannot dispute the facts as they stand.
posted on 9/2/14
no, just reiterating a FACT
posted on 9/2/14
The RS on the Everton board
The flock like sheeple to Phil and his wum posts....well done Phil
Page 1 of 3