or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 105 comments are related to an article called:

Normal service resumed !

Page 4 of 5

posted on 15/2/14

And yet you still commented Brummie? A domestic 100 % record at home until we lost to Chelsea. Normal service resumed today. Quite simple really.

posted on 15/2/14

Wound up? No, I just don't like the way the Arsenal board cheat honest fans. Profiteering parasites the lot of them. Or do Sir Chips and Lady Nina give a flying f. about the proud Arsenal? At least Roman spends his money and looks like he enjoys it as much as the rest of us.

It obviously means a lot to you as you have no other rebuttal.

Sort yourselves out Gooners!

posted on 15/2/14

comment by Silva's magic wand :-0 (U11992)
posted 24 minutes ago
And yet you still commented Brummie? A domestic 100 % record at home until we lost to Chelsea. Normal service resumed today. Quite simple really.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Barca will kill you. Isolate Frankenberry and your defense is poor. You know Messi will destroy you.

posted on 15/2/14

The more I watch Arsenal the more I realise they are a totally moribund, pointless addition to the Premiership. Their venal hatred of their own fans is ludicrous. No other club in the world would act with such a blatant disregard of their own supporters and have the affrontery to celebrate their balance sheets like some sort of trophy.
--------------------------------

Brilliant post mate.
That Sheriff fella thinks people care what he says but he couldn't be further from the truth. He's an irrelevance just like his manager and team.

8 years and B'ham City & Wigan have won more.

posted on 15/2/14

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 15/2/14

Wound up? No, I just don't like the way the Arsenal board cheat honest fans. Profiteering parasites the lot of them. Or do Sir Chips and Lady Nina give a flying f. about the proud Arsenal? At least Roman spends his money and looks like he enjoys it as much as the rest of us.

It obviously means a lot to you as you have no other rebuttal.

Sort yourselves out Gooners!
------------------------------------

But you did sound pretty wound up though. Else, your ramblings make no sense in the context of this article or my comment which you replied.

No one is being cheated out of anything though. If you can't afford the prices, television viewing is a greater experience than ever. It's simple demand-and-supply economics.

Obviously insecure about your devalued success which no one respects. Sorry for that.

posted on 15/2/14

Brilliant post mate.
That Sheriff fella thinks people care what he says but he couldn't be further from the truth. He's an irrelevance just like his manager and team.

8 years and B'ham City & Wigan have won more.
--------------------------------------------

And you didn't care enough to change your moniker to something with my username? How pathetic do you have to be? Must be pretty desperate for attention.

Sorry for the insecurity you feel about supporting a billionaire's play thing. Not my fault what your average neutral thinks.

posted on 15/2/14

comment by The Grand Cannon (U18697)
posted 6 minutes ago
Drink Little (U10974)
---------------------------------------
You need help mate, desperately. Especially psychological counselling. You are a very sad and extreme case of a mentally twisted soul. I hope you are not on drugs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why? You think your parasitic board is good for your club?

posted on 15/2/14

Come on Cannon. That's a pretty nasty thing to say about anyone. Even a Chelsea fan. Everything I said is public knowledge and 99% of football fans would agree with it.

Is your chairman called Sir Chips?

posted on 15/2/14

comment by Sheriff John Brown - bring back David Dein (U7482)
posted 13 minutes ago
Wound up? No, I just don't like the way the Arsenal board cheat honest fans. Profiteering parasites the lot of them. Or do Sir Chips and Lady Nina give a flying f. about the proud Arsenal? At least Roman spends his money and looks like he enjoys it as much as the rest of us.

It obviously means a lot to you as you have no other rebuttal.

Sort yourselves out Gooners!
------------------------------------

But you did sound pretty wound up though. Else, your ramblings make no sense in the context of this article or my comment which you replied.

No one is being cheated out of anything though. If you can't afford the prices, television viewing is a greater experience than ever. It's simple demand-and-supply economics.

Obviously insecure about your devalued success which no one respects. Sorry for that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
£130 to see you lay down against Bayern. Right mate

posted on 15/2/14

Sorry for the insecurity you feel about supporting a billionaire's play thing. Not my fault what your average neutral thinks.
------------------------------------------------------------

Your average neutral believe what The Sun tells him to think!

posted on 15/2/14

£130 to see you lay down against Bayern. Right mate
---------------------------------------------------

It's all relative. Some would consider anything above 10 pounds to watch grown men chase a ball round a pitch and be part of juvenile banter in the stands is stupid. That's the modern game for you. Many can afford it. It doesn't compare to what NFL teams charge. If you can't afford it, stay at home and listen to great commentary with super-slow mo replays.

Again, your bizzare ramblings had nothing to do with the article or my comments. You're only exposing your insecurities. Not my fault no one respects your mob-bought titles.

posted on 15/2/14

Once again you prove your ignorance. Surely it's relative to teams of a similar stature? I wouldn't pay £5 to watch a game in the park. Why are you so offended that your board are taking you for a ride? It's common knowledge. I like Arsenal and they don't deserve to be such a two-bob outfit because of greedy shareholders.

Your NFL comparison is nonsense, I paid $55 for very good seats to watch the Seahawks. Who did you see? and did you buy from a scalper?

posted on 15/2/14

So, relative to Bayern, what do you charge? Don't see the point in your stupid comparison with us either. You can't charge Arsenal's rates cos you don't have the demand to sell out at our rates. Not to mention, the push to compete with clubs like you with the vulgar, sugar-daddy inspired, obscene spending is one of the reasons fans are saddled with the responsibility in the first place

But all this ignores the reason your off-topic ramblings were raised in the first place. What the fack does Arsenal's ticket prices have to do with this article?.

comment by MBL. (U6305)

posted on 16/2/14

The second goal was a Milner-Silva-Nasri move, all midfielders

That second goal was offside

Our goal against Norwich was onside an wrongly disallowed, same with our goal against Newcastle.

Swings and roundabouts.

posted on 16/2/14

Don't care if the goal was off-side. Decision in no way changed the result. City best team on the day and deserved to win. We were never in it.

posted on 16/2/14

Exactly Biggish. The second goal was offside, but no matter, the only difference would have been that we lost 1-0 instead of 2-0. When you don't have any shots on target the best you can realistically hope for is 0.

posted on 16/2/14

"Nah. We cared more about six points in the league, over the dwindling FA cup, that's all. Simple as."

Oh dear, did you seriously just come out with the classic loser's lament that you weren't interested in the silly old FA cup anyway? very poor, like disrespecting the minutes silence.

comment by MBL. (U6305)

posted on 16/2/14

Always classy Chelsea fans.

posted on 16/2/14

"The second goal was a Milner-Silva-Nasri move, all midfielders

That second goal was offside"

Really? how do you know that? Ahh the slow motion replay eh?
Well that showed that Nasri was in line with the defenders but a 10th of a second later on the VT and his left arm is off side. His arm played no part in the goal he scored and if you are an assistant referee looking across in real time then it was probably the right decision. TV slow motion replays do not win or lose games and fans desperately trying to discredit goals based on such flimsy borderline slow motion evidence are particularly sad and bad losers.

posted on 16/2/14

comment by BluePhoenix (U1189)
posted 19 minutes ago
"The second goal was a Milner-Silva-Nasri move, all midfielders

That second goal was offside"

Really? how do you know that? Ahh the slow motion replay eh?
Well that showed that Nasri was in line with the defenders but a 10th of a second later on the VT and his left arm is off side. His arm played no part in the goal he scored and if you are an assistant referee looking across in real time then it was probably the right decision. TV slow motion replays do not win or lose games and fans desperately trying to discredit goals based on such flimsy borderline slow motion evidence are particularly sad and bad losers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dont get too touchy

He merely stated a fact

You deserved to win...I know its your moment but dont come and give here on Chelsea board

comment by MBL. (U6305)

posted on 16/2/14

Why? Can't you handle bants?

comment by MBL. (U6305)

posted on 16/2/14

As for giving out, look at Maurine he's just as much an rse the second time round.

posted on 16/2/14

Its strange because we rarely encountered each other but nowadays our board is fested by you lot.

posted on 16/2/14

Blame your beloved manager for that.

Page 4 of 5

Sign in if you want to comment