or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 19 comments are related to an article called:

Rooney is NOT on 300k.

Page 1 of 1

comment by Ruiney (U1005)

posted on 12/4/14

Won't stop people spouting the 300k BS.

comment by Ruiney (U1005)

posted on 12/4/14

So Rooney actually took a pay cut because he knows he needs United's commercial strength.

So much for being bigger than the club

posted on 12/4/14

So one newspaper is correct and all the others aren't. Allllrighty then...

Truth is, it's more than likely none of them know the full details

comment by Saggy8 (U19042)

posted on 12/4/14

Wayne Rooney 300k a week

He's on 300k, and you know he is
300k
and you know he is
300k
and you know he is
300k
and you know he is

posted on 12/4/14

Whatever it is, he ain't worth it with the performances and attitude he's been putting in for years. All hype, little substance when it actually matters in the big games.

posted on 12/4/14

comment by TheWhiteWall68 (U17633)
posted 18 seconds ago
Whatever it is, he ain't worth it with the performances and attitude he's been putting in for years. All hype, little substance when it actually matters in the big games.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This

posted on 12/4/14

This doesn't mean anything

posted on 12/4/14

So with commercial earnings it is about 300k?

posted on 12/4/14

why I should I believe this over other articles, because the number is lower?

posted on 12/4/14

the telegraph isnt some messiah of knowledge

posted on 12/4/14

With ginger managerial meastro Moyes at the helm, United out of champions league football next season and the ever failing impact of bewigged croxtethian curb crawler Rooney on the pitch, the timing for the commercial aspect of this agreement couldn't be better.

posted on 12/4/14

Would be far smarter to link earnings potential to on field performance rather than "commercial performance"

posted on 12/4/14

Yes but when Yaya was on a reported £250k a week you didnt look into the breakdowns of it all did you?

Whys it different for fatboy? Dont like it when the shoes on the other foot?

posted on 12/4/14

To be fair, If true, it could work out to be a smart move for both parties.
Dont really see it being used as a contract model for many other players though, as Rooney exists within a level of commercial appeal beyond most players in the game.

comment by MBL. (U6305)

posted on 12/4/14

If it's good you believe it, if it's not you deny it.

When a player at his peak signs a new contract it's not going to be for less is it.

If ferguson was still manager then Rooney wouldn't be there, fergies gone Rooney stayed and you think he won't be on more money and is actualy taking a pay cut,

that's usually how it works.

posted on 12/4/14

If this article is true then he also says that Rooney was on £240k a week. A lot of you have tried to tell us over the last few years that he wasn't on this reported £250k figure (£240k is close enough)

Whatever the truth is, you're paying a lot of money for little return at the moment.

posted on 12/4/14

sounds like he's on a lot more than £300k a week

posted on 12/4/14

Lol... thou dost protest too much

comment by Beeb (U1841)

posted on 12/4/14

Jesus Christ! For that sort of wodge we could go out and buy…. ooooohhh…. maybe seven Demichelis's?

Page 1 of 1

Sign in if you want to comment