There are some blinkered neanderthals on here. I give up trying to educate them. They are beyond help

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Some of the people contributing to this thread to criticise Liverpool fans for the tragedy seem to be very young and not very experienced in injustice.

David v. Goliath.

The members of this forum that are young will one day experience the fact that they are just ordinary people with no power up against the establishment. Maybe then they will look back and reconsider their views regarding the 25 year fight that the relatives of the bereaved have endured simply to get at the truth.

We all know the truth. The police fouled up and then tried to blame the fans.

All events that involve crowds require police control. It is called public safety. Even Royal events where you get masses of people require strict police control and supervision. The people attending a royal wedding are not drunks but the crowd still needs to be controlled.

The police fouled up.

MyHammers. You're comparing Hysel to Hillsborough. There is nothing remotely to tie the two.

You then go on to say that because Liverpool fans were at fault for Hysel, then it stands to reason that they must be at fault for Hillsborough. Do You have any idea how stupid and baseless your opinion is. Especially as you admit it's gleaned from titbits you've picked up from the media, all of which have been proved to be false. Do you understand this? An independent commission found that Liverpool fans were not to blame for Hillsborough. What more does it need to get it through you extremely thick skull?

Basically, I don't think it would make a difference what proof was put in front f you. You clearly have an irrational dislike of Liverpool, so you'd ignore it anyway.

You're just the cesspit of the human population, and the only thing that could make your existence worthwhile is if you could take the place of one of the 96. At least we could then say one of them deserved it.

Here's the PM's full statement on the finding of the independent inquiry. Maybe some of you could educate yourselves on the FACTS
---------------------------------------------------
Today the Bishop of Liverpool, the Rt Reverend James Jones, is publishing the report of the Hillsborough Independent Panel.

The disaster at the Hillsborough football stadium on 15th April 1989 was one of the greatest peacetime tragedies of the last century.

96 people died as a result of a crush in the Leppings Lane Terrace at the FA Cup Semi-Final between Liverpool and Nottingham Forest.

There was a public Inquiry at the time by Lord Justice Taylor which found – and I quote – that the main cause of the disaster was “a failure of police control.”

But the Inquiry didn’t have access to all the documents that have since become available…

…it didn’t properly examine the response of the emergency services …

…it was followed by a deeply controversial inquest…

…and by a media version of events that sought to blame the fans.

As a result, the families have not heard the truth and have not found justice.

That is why the previous government – and in particular – the Rt Hon Member for Leigh was right to set up this Panel.

And it is why this government insisted that no stone should be left unturned and that all papers should be made available to the Bishop of Liverpool and his team.

Mr Speaker, in total over 450,000 pages of evidence have been reviewed.

It was right that the families should see the Report first.

As a result the government has only had a very limited amount of time to study the evidence so far.

But it is already very clear that many of the report’s findings are deeply distressing.

There are three areas in particular.

The failure of the authorities to help protect people.

The attempt to blame the fans.

And the doubt cast on the original Coroner’s Inquest.

Let me take each in turn.

FINDINGS: FAILURE OF THE AUTHORITIES

First, there is new evidence about how the authorities failed.

There is a trail of new documents which show the extent to which the safety of the crowd at Hillsborough was “compromised at every level.”

The ground failed to meet minimum standards and the “deficiencies were well known”.

The turnstiles were inadequate.

The ground capacity had been significantly over-calculated.

The crush barriers failed to meet safety standards.

There had been a crush at exactly the same match the year before.

And today’s report shows clearly that lessons had not been learnt.

The report backs up again the key finding of the Taylor Report on police failure.

But it goes further by revealing for the first time the shortcomings of the ambulance and emergency services response.

The major incident plan was not fully implemented.

Rescue attempts were held back by failures of leadership and co-ordination.

And, significantly, new documents today show there was a delay from the emergency services when people were being crushed and killed.

FINDINGS: ATTEMPT TO BLAME THE FANS

Second, the families have long believed that some of the authorities attempted to create a completely unjust account of events that sought to blame the fans for what happened.

Mr Speaker, the families were right.

The evidence in today’s report includes briefings to the media…

…and attempts by the Police to change the record of events.

On the media. Several newspapers reported false allegations that fans were drunk and violent and stole from the dead.

The Sun’s report sensationalised these allegations under a banner headline “The Truth.”

This was clearly wrong and caused huge offence, distress and hurt.

News International has co-operated with the Panel and, for the first time, today’s report reveals that the source for these despicable untruths was a Sheffield news agency reporting conversations with South Yorkshire Police and Irvine Patnick, the then MP for Sheffield Hallam.

The Report finds that this was part of police efforts – and I quote - “to develop and publicise a version of events that focused on…allegations of drunkenness, ticketlessness and violence.”

In terms of changing the record of events, we already know that police reports were significantly altered but the full extent was not drawn to Lord Justice Taylor’s attention.

Today’s Report finds that 164 statements were significantly amended – and 116 explicitly removed negative comments about the policing operation - including its lack of leadership.

The report also makes important findings about particular actions taken by the police and coroner while investigating the deaths.

There is new evidence which shows that police officers carried out police national computer checks on those who had died …

…in an attempt – and I quote from the report - “to impugn the reputations of the deceased.”

The Coroner took blood alcohol levels from all of the deceased including children.

The Panel finds no rationale whatsoever for what it regards as an “exceptional” decision.

The report states clearly that the attempt of the inquest to draw a link between blood alcohol and late arrival was “fundamentally flawed”.

And that alcohol consumption was “unremarkable and not exceptional for a social or leisure occasion”.

Mr Speaker, over all these years questions have been raised about the role of the government – including whether it did enough to uncover the truth.

It is certainly true that some of the language in the government papers published today was insensitive.

But having been through every document – and every government document including Cabinet Minutes will be published - the Panel found no evidence of any government trying to conceal the truth.

At the time of the Taylor Report the then Prime Minister was briefed by her private secretary that the defensive and – I quote - “close to deceitful” behaviour of senior South Yorkshire officers was “depressingly familiar.”

And it is clear that the then government thought it right that the Chief Constable of South Yorkshire should resign.

But as the Rt Hon Member for Leigh has rightly highlighted, governments then and since have simply not done enough to challenge publicly the unjust and untrue narrative that sought to blame the fans.

FINDINGS: ORIGINAL CORONER’S INQUEST

Third, and perhaps most significantly of all, the Bishop of Liverpool’s report presents new evidence which casts significant doubt over the adequacy of the original Inquest.

The Coroner - on the advice of pathologists - believed that victims suffered traumatic asphyxia leading to unconsciousness within seconds and death within a few minutes.

As a result he asserted that beyond 3.15pm there were no actions that could have changed the fate of the victims and he limited the scope of the Inquest accordingly.

But by analysing post mortem reports the Panel have found that 28 did not have obstruction of blood circulation and 31 had evidence of heart and lungs continuing to function after the crush.

This means that individuals in those groups could have had potentially reversible asphyxia beyond 3.15pm…

…in contrast to the findings of the Coroner and a subsequent Judicial Review.

And the Panel states clearly that “it is highly likely that what happened to those individuals after 3.15pm was significant” in determining whether they died.

RESPONSE

Mr Speaker, the conclusions of this report will be harrowing for many of the families affected.

Anyone who has lost a child knows the pain never leaves you.

But to read a report years afterwards that says – and I quote…

…“a swifter, more appropriate, better focused and properly equipped response had the potential to save more lives”…

…can only add to the pain

It is for the Attorney General to decide whether to apply to the High Court to quash the original inquest and seek a new one.

In this capacity he acts independently of government. And he will need to examine the evidence himself.

But it is clear to me that the new evidence in today’s report raises vital questions which must be examined.

And the Attorney General has assured me that he will examine this new evidence immediately and reach a decision as fast as possible.

But ultimately it is for the High Court to decide.

It is also right that the House should have an opportunity to debate the issues raised in this report fully.

My Rt Hon Friend the Home Secretary will be taking forward a debate in Government time. And this will happen when the House returns in October.

APOLOGY

Mr Speaker, I want to be very clear about the view the government takes about these findings…

…and why after 23 years this matters so much, not just for the families but for Liverpool and for our country as a whole.

Mr Speaker what happened that day – and since – was wrong.

It was wrong that the responsible authorities knew Hillsborough did not meet minimum safety standards and yet still allowed the match to go ahead.

It was wrong that the families have had to wait for so long – and fight so hard – just to get to the truth.

And it was wrong that the police changed the records of what happened and tried to blame the fans.

We ask the police to do difficult and often very dangerous things on our behalf.

And South Yorkshire Police is a very different organisation today from what it was then.

But we do the many, many honourable police men and women a great disservice…

…if we try to defend the indefensible.

It was also wrong that neither Lord Justice Taylor nor the Coroner looked properly at the response of the other emergency services.

Again, these are dedicated people who do extraordinary things to serve the public.

But the evidence from today’s report makes very difficult reading.

Mr Speaker, with the weight of the new evidence in this Report, it is right for me today as Prime Minister to make a proper apology to the families of the 96 for all they have suffered over the past 23 years.

Indeed, the new evidence that we are presented with today makes clear that these families have suffered a double injustice.

The injustice of the appalling events - the failure of the state to protect their loved ones and the indefensible wait to get to the truth.

And the injustice of the denigration of the deceased – that they were somehow at fault for their own deaths.

On behalf of the Government – and indeed our country – I am profoundly sorry for this double injustice that has been left uncorrected for so long.

Mr Speaker, because of what I have described as the second injustice – the false version of events - not enough people in this country understand what the people of Merseyside have been through.

This appalling death toll of so many loved ones lost…

…was compounded by an attempt to blame the victims.

A narrative about hooliganism on that day was created …

…which led many in the country to accept that it was somehow a grey area.

Today’s report is black and white.

The Liverpool fans “were not the cause of the disaster”.

The Panel has quite simply found “no evidence” in support of allegations of “exceptional levels of drunkenness, ticketlessness or violence among Liverpool fans”….

….”no evidence that fans had conspired to arrive late at the stadium”…

….and “no evidence that they stole from the dead and dying.”

Mr Speaker, I’m sure the whole House will want to thank the Bishop of Liverpool and his Panel for all the work they have done.

And I am sure that all sides will join with me in paying tribute to the incredible strength and dignity of the Hillsborough families and the community which has backed them in their long search for justice.

While nothing can ever bring back those who have been lost…

…with all the documents revealed

…and nothing held back…

…the families, at last, have access to the truth

And I commend this Statement to the House.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by terminator1 (U1863)
posted 11 hours, 11 minutes ago
Here's the PM's full statement on the finding of the independent inquiry. Maybe some of you could educate yourselves on the FACTS




It's amazing that the Prime Minister read all that out, admitting all the failings, specifically saying the fans were NOT to blame, yet we STILL have knuckle draggers like myhammers who know best.

Funny enough, he seems to have disappeared....

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Jon-Paul Gilhooley Aged 10
Adam Edward Spearritt Aged 14
Lee Nicol Aged 14
Paul Brian Murray Aged 14
Philip Hammond Aged 14
Thomas Anthony Howard Aged 14
Kevin Daniel Williams Aged 15
Kevin Tyrrell Aged 15
Peter Andrew Harrison Aged 15
Philip John Steele Aged 15
Victoria Jane Hicks Aged 15
Kester Roger Marcus Ball Aged 16
Martin Kevin Traynor Aged 16
Nicholas Michael Hewitt Aged 16
Carl Darren Hewitt Aged 17
Graham John Wright Aged 17
Henry Charles Rogers Aged 17
Keith McGrath Aged 17
Simon Bell Aged 17
Stephen Francis O'Neill Aged 17
Steven Joseph Robinson Aged 17
Stuart Paul William Thompson Aged 17
Carl Brown Aged 18
Carl David Lewis Aged 18
Christopher Barry Devonside Aged 18
Gary Philip Jones Aged 18
James Gary Aspinall Aged 18
John McBrien Aged 18
Jonathon Owens Aged 18
Paul Clark Aged 18
Colin Mark Ashcroft Aged 19
Colin Wafer Aged 19
David William Mather Aged 19
Gary Christopher Church Aged 19
Ian David Whelan Aged 19
James Philip Delaney Aged 19
Paul William Carlile Aged 19
Sarah Louise Hicks Aged 19
Gordon Rodney Horn Aged 20
Ian Thomas Glover Aged 20
Stephen Paul Copoc Aged 20
Carl William Rimmer Aged 21
Joseph Daniel McCarthy Aged 21
Marian Hazel McCabe Aged 21
Paul David Brady Aged 21
Peter Francis Tootle Aged 21
Peter McDonnell Aged 21
Thomas Steven Fox Aged 21
David John Benson Aged 22
David William Birtle Aged 22
Gary Collins Aged 22
Tony Bland Aged 22
Colin Andrew Hugh William Sefton Aged 23
David Leonard Thomas Aged 23
Tracey Elizabeth Cox Aged 23
William Roy Pemberton Aged 23
Derrick George Godwin Aged 24
Graham John Roberts Aged 24
Peter Andrew Burkett Aged 24
David Steven Brown Aged 25
Richard Jones Aged 25
Andrew Mark Brookes Aged 26
Barry Sidney Bennett Aged 26
Christopher James Traynor Aged 26
Paul Anthony Hewitson Aged 26
Paula Ann Smith Aged 26
Barry Glover Aged 27
Christine Anne Jones Aged 27
Francis Joseph McAllister Aged 27
Gary Harrison Aged 27
Nicholas Peter Joynes Aged 27
Alan McGlone Aged 28
Alan Johnston Aged 29
Anthony Peter Kelly Aged 29
Chris Edwards Aged 29
James Robert Hennessy Aged 29
Joseph Clark Aged 29
Martin Kenneth Wild Aged 29
Peter Reuben Thompson Aged 30
Stephen Francis Harrison Aged 31
Eric Hankin Aged 33
Roy Harry Hamilton Aged 34
Vincent Michael Fitzsimmons Aged 34
Patrick John Thompson Aged 35
Brian Christopher Matthews Aged 38
Dave George Rimmer Aged 38
Inger Shah Aged 38
Michael David Kelly Aged 38
David Hawley Aged 39
Thomas Howard Aged 39
Arthur Horrocks Aged 41
Eric George Hughes Aged 42
Henry Thomas Burke Aged 47
Raymond Thomas Chapman Aged 50
John Alfred Anderson Aged 62
Gerard Bernard Patrick Baron Aged 67