Solid 3 or 4 as he knows his stuff but pops his pool glasses on now and again
3.5
Long way to go but less biased than and more insightful tactically than the MOTD crowd.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bm5rPeBCAAAr9st.jpg
He's pretty good. They have a good team there.
What a game. Football eh.. Gotta luv it.
Can't understand a word he says!
One of the best pundits after Hansen.
i think he's overrated a little to be honest. gary neville is more clear and concise in what he says. i prefer listening/watching gary to jamie.
Solid 3 or 4 as he knows his stuff but pops his pool glasses on now and again
----------------------
This ^
Carra is great but maybe still learning?
G Nev has a job for life.
comment by Scribe is back (U18092)
posted 6 minutes ago
Solid 3 or 4 as he knows his stuff but pops his pool glasses on now and again
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Now the feck did you get banned from rating?
Carra is okay, tough to understand but he and Nev work well together,
G Neville is ace!
Had he retired 4 years ealier he might have saved Andy Gray the disgrace.
#whatastrike
He's alright. I've always had a lot of respect for Carra, even when he was Mr Liverpool. Seems like a decent guy.
4
Enjoy listening to his analysis
I just see him repeating everything Neville says to be honest
Nowhere near Neville.
Don't like the way he says 'we' when describing Liverpool. Too biased for me.
G Nev: 'RVP is like a burglar in your house'
Carra: 'If there was a burglar, you'd be under the bed!'
G Nev: 'You'd be the burglar!'
Quality.
G Nev: 'You'd be the burglar!'
i got the impression tonight that Carra thought if he had been playing Liverpool would have won, and he may have been right
If Liverpool aren't involved he is a 4 but when they do come into it, he does become biased.
OK. Better than Redknapp and inferior to Neville.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Eveywhere:
True - i have picked up on the "we" thing as well. I can pardon that when as a PUNDIT cos I think the all do that.
However, I must say saying "we" as an ANALYST comes across as very unprofessional. He should learn from Neville.
I dont think he needs to be that partial. Just because he says we, that hasnt stopped him from laying into Liverpool when he feels its necessary. The only thing he needs to do is to start getting his point across quickly rather than just waffle on for too long.
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
Please rate Jamie Carragher as a pundit
Page 1 of 1
posted on 5/5/14
I rate him as lal!
posted on 5/5/14
Solid 3 or 4 as he knows his stuff but pops his pool glasses on now and again
posted on 5/5/14
3.5
Long way to go but less biased than and more insightful tactically than the MOTD crowd.
posted on 5/5/14
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bm5rPeBCAAAr9st.jpg
posted on 5/5/14
He's pretty good. They have a good team there.
What a game. Football eh.. Gotta luv it.
posted on 5/5/14
Can't understand a word he says!
posted on 5/5/14
sorry banned from rating
posted on 5/5/14
One of the best pundits after Hansen.
posted on 5/5/14
i think he's overrated a little to be honest. gary neville is more clear and concise in what he says. i prefer listening/watching gary to jamie.
posted on 5/5/14
Solid 3 or 4 as he knows his stuff but pops his pool glasses on now and again
----------------------
This ^
Carra is great but maybe still learning?
G Nev has a job for life.
posted on 5/5/14
comment by Scribe is back (U18092)
posted 6 minutes ago
Solid 3 or 4 as he knows his stuff but pops his pool glasses on now and again
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 5/5/14
Now the feck did you get banned from rating?
Carra is okay, tough to understand but he and Nev work well together,
posted on 5/5/14
G Neville is ace!
Had he retired 4 years ealier he might have saved Andy Gray the disgrace.
#whatastrike
posted on 5/5/14
He's alright. I've always had a lot of respect for Carra, even when he was Mr Liverpool. Seems like a decent guy.
posted on 5/5/14
4
Enjoy listening to his analysis
posted on 5/5/14
I just see him repeating everything Neville says to be honest
posted on 5/5/14
Nowhere near Neville.
Don't like the way he says 'we' when describing Liverpool. Too biased for me.
posted on 5/5/14
G Nev: 'RVP is like a burglar in your house'
Carra: 'If there was a burglar, you'd be under the bed!'
G Nev: 'You'd be the burglar!'
Quality.
posted on 5/5/14
G Nev: 'You'd be the burglar!'
posted on 6/5/14
i got the impression tonight that Carra thought if he had been playing Liverpool would have won, and he may have been right
posted on 6/5/14
If Liverpool aren't involved he is a 4 but when they do come into it, he does become biased.
posted on 6/5/14
OK. Better than Redknapp and inferior to Neville.
posted on 6/5/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 6/5/14
Eveywhere:
True - i have picked up on the "we" thing as well. I can pardon that when as a PUNDIT cos I think the all do that.
However, I must say saying "we" as an ANALYST comes across as very unprofessional. He should learn from Neville.
posted on 6/5/14
I dont think he needs to be that partial. Just because he says we, that hasnt stopped him from laying into Liverpool when he feels its necessary. The only thing he needs to do is to start getting his point across quickly rather than just waffle on for too long.
Page 1 of 1