Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by MafiaBoy (U8613)




posted 12 minutes ago



That's coming from a football fan who never reached any major finals in this millennium

-------

maf. why are you boasting about losing a cup final?

you don't hear me harping on about Coventry beating us in the cup final in 1987 do you?

Not boasting at all...just mentioning the facts about big club Spurs.

you are correct maf, it is a fact that we are a big club

Big club with no major finals in this millennium..

comment by MafiaBoy (U8613)




posted 1 minute ago



Big club with no major finals in this millennium..

----------

we won the league cup in 2008 maf. the football authorities in this country consider the league cup to be a major domestic trophy

Really? Then, why do your rivals, such as, City play with their second team in that competition?

lots of teams play with reserve players in the fa cup too maf

didn't city beat you 9-0 last season in the league cup.. was that city reserves then?

Let us know by how many goals you lost to your RIVALS, City?

man. city beat us in the premier league with their first strength team.




so pooops, tell us please why it is that west ham is a bigger club than spurs.

Again, you are deluded. We try to educate you that Spurs are not a big club as you believed. Not as whehter West Ham are a bigger club or not..

In two years time, West Ham would be moving in to a bigger ground than Spurs. I believe that matched one of the criteria for a club bigger than Spurs.

comment by MafiaBoy (U8613)




posted 2 minutes ago



Again, you are deluded. We try to educate you that Spurs are not a big club as you believed. Not as whehter West Ham are a bigger club or not..

In two years time, West Ham would be moving in to a bigger ground than Spurs. I believe that matched one of the criteria for a club bigger than Spurs

---------

so come back to me in two years time then pooops.

until then, we smash you to bits in every sensible measure of what makes one club bigger than the other

we smash you to bits in every sensible measure of what makes one club bigger than the other
----

Thank God, not on the field though..

Is it fair to say that West Ham lost us the WC in 2010 due to Green's butter fingered displays and Upson's donkey defending?

Is it fair to say that West Ham lost us the WC in 2010 due to Green's butter fingered displays and Upson's donkey defending?



-----

Ha ha another deluded Spurs fan in Chicken is here..

Chicken, despite of Rob Green's mistake England progressed from the group stage..

Chicken, despite of Rob Green's mistake England progressed from the group stage

===============

Not top they didnt.

And its not delusion - it was just a question.

Why was it not their fault? If a striker can win you it - the keeper loses you it, surely?

If a striker can win you it.
--

At least Upson scored a goal, whereas, Defoe done a zilch in 75mins against Germany..

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

has thre ever been an article on this board not resulting in a wumfest

done a zilch

clicky. there are no wumfests on this board. these articles consist simply of maf getting owned by spurs fans in every article from start to finish

Yes, it's evident on the "West Ham Should finish above Spurs" article..

Maf,

At least Upson scored a goal, whereas, Defoe done a zilch in 75mins against Germany..

===============

Conceding far more than you score doesnt really help win football matches though i'm afraid.

I just think its fair to say West Ham cost us that WC, if you are to claim they had a hand in the '66 one.

It was really just a simple point to make the article consistent.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

this article is embarrassing and any west ham fan should be embarrassed by this clown mylosers.