comment by Ruiney Reckers (U1005)
posted 6 minutes ago
You don't pay interest on money you don't have to pay in the first place.

-----------

But i've proved that Chelsea dictated the fee

You haven't refuted this

comment by Metro.⚽️ (U6770)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Ruiney Reckers (U1005)
posted 6 minutes ago
You don't pay interest on money you don't have to pay in the first place.

-----------

But i've proved that Chelsea dictated the fee

You haven't refuted this
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So why do you keep going on about it?

comment by Robben #20 (U1145)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Metro.⚽️ (U6770)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Ruiney Reckers (U1005)
posted 6 minutes ago
You don't pay interest on money you don't have to pay in the first place.

-----------

But i've proved that Chelsea dictated the fee

You haven't refuted this
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So why do you keep going on about it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Because even though i know i'm the winner, I just like to see others acknowledge it

"even though i know i'm the winner, I just like to see others acknowledge it"

I see so much of myself in you, Metro.

comment by Metro.⚽️ (U6770)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robben #20 (U1145)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Metro.⚽️ (U6770)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Ruiney Reckers (U1005)
posted 6 minutes ago
You don't pay interest on money you don't have to pay in the first place.

-----------

But i've proved that Chelsea dictated the fee

You haven't refuted this
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So why do you keep going on about it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Because even though i know i'm the winner, I just like to see others acknowledge it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Winner

You still paid the £35m, this is a fact.

Therefore, you are not a winner

Conclusion: you lot don't accept facts - only opinion.

on that note *walks away whistling with a spring in my step

comment by Metro.⚽️ (U6770)
posted 42 seconds ago

Conclusion: you lot don't accept facts - only opinion.

on that note *walks away whistling with a spring in my step
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good for you.

Bye

You paying £35m for Carroll is not an opinion, it's a fact.

Metro just doesn't accept facts. Poor fella.

http://www.lfcreds.com/reds/index.php?topic=42863.0

There's a breakdown of your 2010/2011 accounts, including the £35m spent on Andy Carroll.

comment by Ruiney Reckers (U1005)
posted 3 minutes ago
http://www.lfcreds.com/reds/index.php?topic=42863.0

There's a breakdown of your 2010/2011 accounts, including the £35m spent on Andy Carroll.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thas what metro would call a TKO

Ruiney:

Where I work (which I won't say for anonymity) - I purchase many things for me and my department.

I sign this off under my name and the invoice is sent to me

But does it come out of my pocket ? Nope, the organisation.

John Henry has already explained how this fee was paid - why didn't you take note ?

Finally, the key point you're missing is that if Carrolls fee went up then so did Torres (by £!5million)

It was all down to Newcastles asking price.

If Newcastle wanted 50million for Carroll then Chelsea would have to pay Liverpool £65million

Either way, we always stood to make £15million - John Henry makes this perfectly clear.

"But does it come out of my pocket ? Nope, the organisation."

So Liverpool FC work for Mike Ashley? Poor analogy

comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Ruiney Reckers (U1005)
posted 3 minutes ago
http://www.lfcreds.com/reds/index.php?topic=42863.0

There's a breakdown of your 2010/2011 accounts, including the £35m spent on Andy Carroll.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thas what metro would call a TKO
----------------------------------------------------------------------

And i'd call you a spectator

comment by Robben #20 (U1145)
posted 15 seconds ago
"But does it come out of my pocket ? Nope, the organisation."

So Liverpool FC work for Mike Ashley? Poor analogy
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It wasn't an analogy - it was logic

But it escaped you for obvious reasons

comment by Metro.⚽️ (U6770)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by Robben #20 (U1145)
posted 15 seconds ago
"But does it come out of my pocket ? Nope, the organisation."

So Liverpool FC work for Mike Ashley? Poor analogy
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It wasn't an analogy - it was logic

But it escaped you for obvious reasons
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not logic

You work for your company and you buy things. i.e you buy things on behalf of the company, as a representative employee.

It dos not work re: Liverpool, Newcastle and Carroll you fool

comment by Metro.⚽️ (U6770)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Ruiney Reckers (U1005)
posted 3 minutes ago
http://www.lfcreds.com/reds/index.php?topic=42863.0

There's a breakdown of your 2010/2011 accounts, including the £35m spent on Andy Carroll.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thas what metro would call a TKO
----------------------------------------------------------------------

And i'd call you a spectator
----------------------------------------------------------------------

And I have watched you on the end of a knockout blow....

A massive TKO

It was a very poor analogy indeed, devoid of any logic.

Your club paid the money, deal with it.

It's not logic

You work for your company and you buy things. i.e you buy things on behalf of the company, as a representative employee.

It dos not work re: Liverpool, Newcastle and Carroll you fool
------

Your mistake is your first line of response

"its not logic"

If you're going to use it as an analogy then carry on regardless but i think you know exactly why I made the point.

Would you agree that the Torres fee was dependant on the Carroll fee?

Because whatever went into our accounts was being dictated by Newcastle.

If you fail to see this then you're refuting facts made by the man at the centre of all of this - JW Hnery

Is Metro doing the moonwalk?

No, he's just backtracking!

comment by Ruiney Reckers (U1005)
posted 1 minute ago
Is Metro doing the moonwalk?

No, he's just backtracking!
----------------------------------------------------------------------

comment by Ruiney Reckers (U1005)
posted 1 minute ago
Is Metro doing the moonwalk?

No, he's just backtracking!
----------------------------------------------------------------------

He must work for the council, he has moved so many goalposts