You are presuming that the base will shut though rather than being used for another purpose. We are talking about removing trident. Not the base itself.

See...I can read between the lines of whatever Bitter Together website you've cobbled that schiedt together from.

Insert <patronising remark about believing a politician>

It is indeed as simple as that curly - 9 billion is the figure of tax raised through oil revenue from the North Sea. The companies will continue to make their money and pay their taxes and will not give a fack whether it goes to Westminster or Holyrood

PB

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

As well as being gullible and ignorant you will even lie rather than admit to being wrong and unable to see the real facts and the big picture
-------
aye, but of course you do

Jesus... And it's me who is uptight? I'm not the one throwing insults around and pretending I'm the only one who can read between the lines.

What can a sub base be used for?
How about base for a Scottish navy?

What people who will lose their jobs? The 520 the MOD say or the unspecified number you think?

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

What can a sub base be used for?
How about base for a Scottish navy?

--

we're gona buy a dingy and call her Jocky McTavish

Oh, we could never have a navy...only Brutanya can rool the waves.

Fck sake

comment by Partick Bateman (U14112)
posted 1 minute ago
Oh, we could never have a navy...only Brutanya can rool the waves.

Fck sake
----------------------------------------------------------------------
hy do we need a Navy

we will be swimming aboot in all this oil...
Bath full of tenners and oil come the separatists day..

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

What have I made up? And it's not me making things up on here...it's you with your unspecified job losses...but it's ok, you know so much that you don't have to bother with actual numbers.

Tell me WHY we couldn't have a navy?

doon the asda wae some sheep to swap fur oor messages

Keep Ferguson's shipyard open and build the fekkers for ourselves.

It's been clearly stated that we'd require a Navy and that the intention is to have a fleet of around 20 vessels to patrol our waters.

I don't think our need for that is contested.

Easdales are talking about buying Fergusons now...better get the ships made quick

comment by Partick Bateman (U14112)
posted 2 minutes ago
What have I made up? And it's not me making things up on here...it's you with your unspecified job losses...but it's ok, you know so much that you don't have to bother with actual numbers.

Tell me WHY we couldn't have a navy?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
wee adolfs navy

he is in Benidorm the now purchasing of some pedallos

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Let the Easdales buy then slap a CPO on them - penny in the pound for the pound for they cants.

What makes you think I was responding to you and not Duke, curly?

comment by Partick Bateman (U14112)
posted 57 seconds ago
What makes you think I was responding to you and not Duke, curly?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
were you talking to me?

whit wur you sayin

bet you made sumit up....

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

300