This will be a great signing if they can get the best out of him, which I think they will, they love a broken personality in Liverpool.
Unfortunately for us I think this really dents our chances of Top 4.
comment by The Verbal Jouster (U11370)
posted 52 seconds ago
Utd are in a mess
............
Wrong answer, try again. This time put some effort into it.
comment by Busbybabes (U9083)
posted 32 seconds ago
This will be a great signing if they can get the best out of him, which I think they will, they love a broken personality in Liverpool.
Unfortunately for us I think this really dents our chances of Top 4.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
unless we sign 2/3 players before the window closes but why i have a feeling we will sign just 1 player no none
What you on about vidicschin?
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
unless we sign 2/3 players before the window closes but why i have a feeling we will sign just 1 player no none
................
The bare minimum that we need to sign is a top class CM so that Fletcher and Carrick when fit, are not first choice starters.
What I do expect is to see a flurry of players leaving, as the deadline looms next week.
If we make any signings now they'll probably be on deadline day.
I'd love to see us sign a top player but I really don't hold any hope. Usually the media pick up on potential transfers (not always), but I can't remember the last time we signed a player we weren't linked to for some time.
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 14 seconds ago
unless we sign 2/3 players before the window closes but why i have a feeling we will sign just 1 player no none
................
What I do expect is to see a flurry of players leaving, as the deadline looms next week.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
don't see it happening, fellaini/carrick injured, herrera, fletcher and clevs our cm, nani gone, rafael and shaw injured. i dont see anyone going not even hernandez
comment by The Verbal Jouster (U11370)
posted 2 minutes ago
What you on about vidicschin?
.............
I was trying to figure out if you had any brain cells that function, with regards to why we are paying Nani's wages still. If you think about it, it really isn't hard, to understand why.
So far you haven't given me any hope.
don't see it happening, fellaini/carrick injured, herrera, fletcher and clevs our cm, nani gone, rafael and shaw injured. i dont see anyone going not even hernandez
...............
You do know that players can still be sold if they are injured?
We bought RVN while he had a knee injury. Rooney as injured when we bought him.
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 minute ago
don't see it happening, fellaini/carrick injured, herrera, fletcher and clevs our cm, nani gone, rafael and shaw injured. i dont see anyone going not even hernandez
...............
You do know that players can still be sold if they are injured?
We bought RVN while he had a knee injury. Rooney as injured when we bought him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
those players are goal scoring machine
what players do you see us selling. personally i feel no player is leaving untill we dont get new players
When a player is loaned out it is normal for the patent club to pay a percentage of their wage and whilst I understand you wanted to do a deal to pay all of his wages for me is bad business
whilst I understand you wanted to do a deal to pay all of his wages for me is bad business
................
Why is it bad business?
I thought Ruud had recovered form his knee injury?
We waited a year because his knee buckled in our first fitness test.
thats's what i thought. when he had his first medical he failed and utd decided to buy him a year later once he recovers
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 minute ago
whilst I understand you wanted to do a deal to pay all of his wages for me is bad business
................
Why is it bad business?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why is it good business? And i'm open minded on it.
Because Nani is being paid to play for another club. You have bought a player who I don't know anything about other than he has a p!ss poor attitude refusing to play for his club, I understand he wanted to move but he is paid very good money and should be ashamed of himself. Fingers crossed he is poor for you lot and you pay other clubs for players to play for them
BB
You are right, for some resaon I thought we had paid the fee up front.
My bad.
comment by The Verbal Jouster (U11370)
posted 2 minutes ago
You have bought a player who I don't know anything about
----------------------------------------------------------------------
for a pool supporter who didnt know aspas went on loan i wonder what you actually know
comment by SouthLondonManc (U12028)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 minute ago
whilst I understand you wanted to do a deal to pay all of his wages for me is bad business
................
Why is it bad business?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why is it good business? And i'm open minded on it.
.................
1. It was obvious to me that it was integral in getting the Rojo deal pushed through ASAP.
2. To anyone with half a brain, it means that we got Rojo for that amount of money less.
3. It means that Nani is not sat at OT doing nothing. It means he is playing football.
4. At present we couldn't sell Nani for a box of chocolates. If his loan is successful we might get a decent return on him or may come back as the player he was four years or so ago, and be of use to us. At worst we will be where we are now.
I see it as a win win situation for all involved. We have got the player we wanted, and we have got rid of someone who isn't going to play.
comment by Viva_Ronaldo (U19085)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by The Verbal Jouster (U11370)
posted 2 minutes ago
You have bought a player who I don't know anything about
----------------------------------------------------------------------
for a pool supporter who didnt know aspas went on loan i wonder what you actually know
............
Very little it would appear.
Nani could play great and then be sold for £20m = good business.
Nani could continue to be crap and loaned out again next season = bad business.
Time will tell
Nani could continue to be crap and loaned out again next season = bad business
............
Not really, because if he is crap it means he won't be playing for us.
Personnaly I think Nani need a permanent move. On his day he is one of the few in our squad that can turn a match.
Sadly he very rarely has one of those days.
A name change to Rectal Jouster may be more appropriate, one suspects.
Sign in if you want to comment
Liverpool open talks with balotelli
Page 4 of 5
posted on 21/8/14
Utd are in a mess
posted on 21/8/14
This will be a great signing if they can get the best out of him, which I think they will, they love a broken personality in Liverpool.
Unfortunately for us I think this really dents our chances of Top 4.
posted on 21/8/14
comment by The Verbal Jouster (U11370)
posted 52 seconds ago
Utd are in a mess
............
Wrong answer, try again. This time put some effort into it.
posted on 21/8/14
comment by Busbybabes (U9083)
posted 32 seconds ago
This will be a great signing if they can get the best out of him, which I think they will, they love a broken personality in Liverpool.
Unfortunately for us I think this really dents our chances of Top 4.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
unless we sign 2/3 players before the window closes but why i have a feeling we will sign just 1 player no none
posted on 21/8/14
What you on about vidicschin?
posted on 21/8/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 21/8/14
unless we sign 2/3 players before the window closes but why i have a feeling we will sign just 1 player no none
................
The bare minimum that we need to sign is a top class CM so that Fletcher and Carrick when fit, are not first choice starters.
What I do expect is to see a flurry of players leaving, as the deadline looms next week.
posted on 21/8/14
If we make any signings now they'll probably be on deadline day.
I'd love to see us sign a top player but I really don't hold any hope. Usually the media pick up on potential transfers (not always), but I can't remember the last time we signed a player we weren't linked to for some time.
posted on 21/8/14
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 14 seconds ago
unless we sign 2/3 players before the window closes but why i have a feeling we will sign just 1 player no none
................
What I do expect is to see a flurry of players leaving, as the deadline looms next week.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
don't see it happening, fellaini/carrick injured, herrera, fletcher and clevs our cm, nani gone, rafael and shaw injured. i dont see anyone going not even hernandez
posted on 21/8/14
comment by The Verbal Jouster (U11370)
posted 2 minutes ago
What you on about vidicschin?
.............
I was trying to figure out if you had any brain cells that function, with regards to why we are paying Nani's wages still. If you think about it, it really isn't hard, to understand why.
So far you haven't given me any hope.
posted on 21/8/14
don't see it happening, fellaini/carrick injured, herrera, fletcher and clevs our cm, nani gone, rafael and shaw injured. i dont see anyone going not even hernandez
...............
You do know that players can still be sold if they are injured?
We bought RVN while he had a knee injury. Rooney as injured when we bought him.
posted on 21/8/14
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 minute ago
don't see it happening, fellaini/carrick injured, herrera, fletcher and clevs our cm, nani gone, rafael and shaw injured. i dont see anyone going not even hernandez
...............
You do know that players can still be sold if they are injured?
We bought RVN while he had a knee injury. Rooney as injured when we bought him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
those players are goal scoring machine
what players do you see us selling. personally i feel no player is leaving untill we dont get new players
posted on 21/8/14
When a player is loaned out it is normal for the patent club to pay a percentage of their wage and whilst I understand you wanted to do a deal to pay all of his wages for me is bad business
posted on 21/8/14
whilst I understand you wanted to do a deal to pay all of his wages for me is bad business
................
Why is it bad business?
posted on 21/8/14
I thought Ruud had recovered form his knee injury?
We waited a year because his knee buckled in our first fitness test.
posted on 21/8/14
thats's what i thought. when he had his first medical he failed and utd decided to buy him a year later once he recovers
posted on 21/8/14
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 minute ago
whilst I understand you wanted to do a deal to pay all of his wages for me is bad business
................
Why is it bad business?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why is it good business? And i'm open minded on it.
posted on 21/8/14
Because Nani is being paid to play for another club. You have bought a player who I don't know anything about other than he has a p!ss poor attitude refusing to play for his club, I understand he wanted to move but he is paid very good money and should be ashamed of himself. Fingers crossed he is poor for you lot and you pay other clubs for players to play for them
posted on 21/8/14
BB
You are right, for some resaon I thought we had paid the fee up front.
My bad.
posted on 21/8/14
comment by The Verbal Jouster (U11370)
posted 2 minutes ago
You have bought a player who I don't know anything about
----------------------------------------------------------------------
for a pool supporter who didnt know aspas went on loan i wonder what you actually know
posted on 21/8/14
comment by SouthLondonManc (U12028)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 minute ago
whilst I understand you wanted to do a deal to pay all of his wages for me is bad business
................
Why is it bad business?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why is it good business? And i'm open minded on it.
.................
1. It was obvious to me that it was integral in getting the Rojo deal pushed through ASAP.
2. To anyone with half a brain, it means that we got Rojo for that amount of money less.
3. It means that Nani is not sat at OT doing nothing. It means he is playing football.
4. At present we couldn't sell Nani for a box of chocolates. If his loan is successful we might get a decent return on him or may come back as the player he was four years or so ago, and be of use to us. At worst we will be where we are now.
I see it as a win win situation for all involved. We have got the player we wanted, and we have got rid of someone who isn't going to play.
posted on 21/8/14
comment by Viva_Ronaldo (U19085)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by The Verbal Jouster (U11370)
posted 2 minutes ago
You have bought a player who I don't know anything about
----------------------------------------------------------------------
for a pool supporter who didnt know aspas went on loan i wonder what you actually know
............
Very little it would appear.
posted on 21/8/14
Nani could play great and then be sold for £20m = good business.
Nani could continue to be crap and loaned out again next season = bad business.
Time will tell
posted on 21/8/14
Nani could continue to be crap and loaned out again next season = bad business
............
Not really, because if he is crap it means he won't be playing for us.
Personnaly I think Nani need a permanent move. On his day he is one of the few in our squad that can turn a match.
Sadly he very rarely has one of those days.
posted on 21/8/14
A name change to Rectal Jouster may be more appropriate, one suspects.
Page 4 of 5