comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 minute ago
Nani could continue to be crap and loaned out again next season = bad business
............
Not really, because if he is crap it means he won't be playing for us.
Personnaly I think Nani need a permanent move. On his day he is one of the few in our squad that can turn a match.
Sadly he very rarely has one of those days.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
personally i didn't want nani to leave..when he and janujaz came on against swansea the game turned towards us and out of all the wingers i rather keep him and sell young and valencia
I see it as a win win situation for all involved. We have got the player we wanted, and we have got rid of someone who isn't going to play.
==========
Whose wages we still would have had to pay in any event
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 13 minutes ago
Nani could continue to be crap and loaned out again next season = bad business
............
Not really, because if he is crap it means he won't be playing for us.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But we are still paying his wages, all £4m/£5m of them. LIke you say we need rid perminantly
But we are still paying his wages
..........
Something I am not going to lose any sleep over, and something that the money men at OT obviously are not.
david luiz not all that as a defender but chelsea somehow sell him to psg for around £40-50m yet we can't seem to sell nani for more than £5m. i thought the one who is buying players is bad i wonder if its the same person controlling when it comes to selling
david luiz not all that as a defender but chelsea somehow sell him to psg for around £40-50m
..............
After the WC, I would like to think someone at PSG has been fired for this.
PSG love brazillian players..there already got silva, lucas and luiz, had alex. i think we should sell anderson to them for £30m that is a bargain for them
comment by Viva_Ronaldo (U19085)
posted 6 minutes ago
david luiz not all that as a defender but chelsea somehow sell him to psg for around £40-50m yet we can't seem to sell nani for more than £5m. i thought the one who is buying players is bad i wonder if its the same person controlling when it comes to selling
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RM got £40+m for Ozil.
Chelsea god £20m for De Bruyne
Arsenal got £15m for Verm
It seems it's only us who can't get decent money for our cast offs.
BB
Let us take a look at why.
Young: Only an English club well buy him, and why would they. He has never ever, at any stage in his career, played to a level of consistency. Terrible buy from SAF
Valencia: We would in all likelyhood get a decent fee for him.
Anderson: He can't keep fit, no one in their right mind would pay more than five million, and that would be good business.
Cleverley: Someone like stoke, WBA would probably pay around five million for him and that is the level he should be playing.
Fletcher: We won't be selling him, but we should be.
Nani: He is the one who should generate a decent fee if he can get his game back.
Welbeck / Hernandez: One of these should go, and Hernandez would reach 20 million + IMO. Welbeck not far off if we sell to the prem, and no other league would want him.
Sign in if you want to comment
Liverpool open talks with balotelli
Page 5 of 5
posted on 21/8/14
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 minute ago
Nani could continue to be crap and loaned out again next season = bad business
............
Not really, because if he is crap it means he won't be playing for us.
Personnaly I think Nani need a permanent move. On his day he is one of the few in our squad that can turn a match.
Sadly he very rarely has one of those days.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
personally i didn't want nani to leave..when he and janujaz came on against swansea the game turned towards us and out of all the wingers i rather keep him and sell young and valencia
posted on 21/8/14
I see it as a win win situation for all involved. We have got the player we wanted, and we have got rid of someone who isn't going to play.
==========
Whose wages we still would have had to pay in any event
posted on 21/8/14
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 13 minutes ago
Nani could continue to be crap and loaned out again next season = bad business
............
Not really, because if he is crap it means he won't be playing for us.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But we are still paying his wages, all £4m/£5m of them. LIke you say we need rid perminantly
posted on 21/8/14
But we are still paying his wages
..........
Something I am not going to lose any sleep over, and something that the money men at OT obviously are not.
posted on 21/8/14
david luiz not all that as a defender but chelsea somehow sell him to psg for around £40-50m yet we can't seem to sell nani for more than £5m. i thought the one who is buying players is bad i wonder if its the same person controlling when it comes to selling
posted on 21/8/14
david luiz not all that as a defender but chelsea somehow sell him to psg for around £40-50m
..............
After the WC, I would like to think someone at PSG has been fired for this.
posted on 21/8/14
PSG love brazillian players..there already got silva, lucas and luiz, had alex. i think we should sell anderson to them for £30m that is a bargain for them
posted on 21/8/14
comment by Viva_Ronaldo (U19085)
posted 6 minutes ago
david luiz not all that as a defender but chelsea somehow sell him to psg for around £40-50m yet we can't seem to sell nani for more than £5m. i thought the one who is buying players is bad i wonder if its the same person controlling when it comes to selling
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RM got £40+m for Ozil.
Chelsea god £20m for De Bruyne
Arsenal got £15m for Verm
It seems it's only us who can't get decent money for our cast offs.
posted on 21/8/14
BB
Let us take a look at why.
Young: Only an English club well buy him, and why would they. He has never ever, at any stage in his career, played to a level of consistency. Terrible buy from SAF
Valencia: We would in all likelyhood get a decent fee for him.
Anderson: He can't keep fit, no one in their right mind would pay more than five million, and that would be good business.
Cleverley: Someone like stoke, WBA would probably pay around five million for him and that is the level he should be playing.
Fletcher: We won't be selling him, but we should be.
Nani: He is the one who should generate a decent fee if he can get his game back.
Welbeck / Hernandez: One of these should go, and Hernandez would reach 20 million + IMO. Welbeck not far off if we sell to the prem, and no other league would want him.
Page 5 of 5