Comment deleted by Site Moderator
What would be your first choice line up VC?
Di Maria is very much a luxury signing IMO
...........
What a moron.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Melts
I don't do line ups.
I really have no clue how we are going to line up for any given game.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
"I really have no clue how we are going to line up for any given game."
That's exactly why I asked, I find your first eleven and tactics very hard to predict at the moment!
I was just wondering whether LVG would play Di Maria as a wingback or change away from the 352. I'm assuming the latter.
Think you need more mobility than Carrick offers for that lineup Guvnor, your midfield will still get overrun.
That's exactly the position I expect you to buy though over the next week!
Melts
There is every possibility LVG will use him as he used Robben in the world cup.
How would kroos or fabregas single handily change us? None off them our match winners and I would bet a substantial amount of money on us still suffering if we had fabregas in our midfield instead of Herrera.
_______________________
It's just their roles in the team. Their job is to dictate the game, control the midifled, give the attackers a platform to do their thing.
We could sign Ronaldo and messi, the bottom line is, if we can't control the midifield, they will just have to feed off scraps or counter attacks at best
Good point VC. He'd suit that.
melts
I agree.
Carrick really shouldn't be a first choice player. We need to move on from him now.
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 36 seconds ago
Good point VC. He'd suit that.
.............
I think so too.
"How would kroos or fabregas single handily change us? None off them our match winners and I would bet a substantial amount of money on us still suffering if we had fabregas in our midfield instead of Herrera."
Clearly wishful thinking. Kroos and especially Cesc is on another planet to Herrera.
To suggest those guys aren't game changers just speaks volumes of the whoever posted this tosh.
Embarrassing comment.
"Clearly wishful thinking. Kroos and especially Cesc is on another planet to Herrera.
To suggest those guys aren't game changers just speaks volumes of the whoever posted this tosh. "
I think it's more the fact that it's the defensive part of the midfield that needs looking at more than a Fabregas or Kroos signing dubbed.
Dubbed
I don't think you are quite getting what he is saying.
My guess is he is saying that untill we solve the DM position, Fabregas wouldn't make us that much better.
Great minds and all that VC
Fair enough. But he did say none of those were game changers. Which is laughable in itself.
Only a fabregas or kroos type CM could've potentially single handedly changed us due to them being able to control games. Di Maria is very much a luxury signing IMO
----------
Erm, okay?
Which Manchester United have you been watching?!
But he did say none of those were game changers. Which is laughable in itself.
..................
That one is very laughable and utterly stupid.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
I think it's more the fact that it's the defensive part of the midfield that needs looking at more than a Fabregas or Kroos signing dubbed.
_______________________________
Our entire midfield is broken. Our CMs don't offer defensive protection, they don't offer any physicality, they can't control the midfield and they're not creating chances for our attackers.
A Kroos and Fabregas alone won't have solved all these problems but they would've more than sovled a couple of them.
Herrera isn't as good as those 2 but he is certainly better than what we currently have so he was a good enough signing. Just a shame we paid more for him than Chelsea and Real paid for Fabregas and kroos
Ah. There we have it. The mystery poster shows himself.
Please refrain from attributing the word 'daft' to someone else after your mare.
Fact of the matter is. A player like Cesc or Kroos would take your midfield to another level. Sure you need to shore up the midfield with a defensive mid too. But from what I've seen from your matches, you severely lack creativity from the CM position, along with the flanks too of course. You've addressed that to a degree with Di Maria now.
And of course Cesc ain't the same type of match winner as Di Maria mainly cause they're completely different players who play in different positions. But Cesc can change a game in a blink of an eye with a pass or goal. So it's idiotic to suggest he ain't a gamechanger.
Fabregas would have been perfect for Man U..Moyes knew this very well..The amount of chances he would create with RVP, Rooney and Mata would be unbelievable..He would need someone to do the donkey work for him ..and Man u are stocked with those type of players..I think Fabregas would have suited Man U better then any team in Prem.
Sign in if you want to comment
What impact could Di Maria have?
Page 2 of 3
posted on 25/8/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 25/8/14
What would be your first choice line up VC?
posted on 25/8/14
Di Maria is very much a luxury signing IMO
...........
What a moron.
posted on 25/8/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 25/8/14
Melts
I don't do line ups.
I really have no clue how we are going to line up for any given game.
posted on 25/8/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 25/8/14
"I really have no clue how we are going to line up for any given game."
That's exactly why I asked, I find your first eleven and tactics very hard to predict at the moment!
I was just wondering whether LVG would play Di Maria as a wingback or change away from the 352. I'm assuming the latter.
posted on 25/8/14
Think you need more mobility than Carrick offers for that lineup Guvnor, your midfield will still get overrun.
That's exactly the position I expect you to buy though over the next week!
posted on 25/8/14
Melts
There is every possibility LVG will use him as he used Robben in the world cup.
posted on 25/8/14
How would kroos or fabregas single handily change us? None off them our match winners and I would bet a substantial amount of money on us still suffering if we had fabregas in our midfield instead of Herrera.
_______________________
It's just their roles in the team. Their job is to dictate the game, control the midifled, give the attackers a platform to do their thing.
We could sign Ronaldo and messi, the bottom line is, if we can't control the midifield, they will just have to feed off scraps or counter attacks at best
posted on 25/8/14
Good point VC. He'd suit that.
posted on 25/8/14
melts
I agree.
Carrick really shouldn't be a first choice player. We need to move on from him now.
posted on 25/8/14
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 36 seconds ago
Good point VC. He'd suit that.
.............
I think so too.
posted on 25/8/14
"How would kroos or fabregas single handily change us? None off them our match winners and I would bet a substantial amount of money on us still suffering if we had fabregas in our midfield instead of Herrera."
Clearly wishful thinking. Kroos and especially Cesc is on another planet to Herrera.
To suggest those guys aren't game changers just speaks volumes of the whoever posted this tosh.
Embarrassing comment.
posted on 25/8/14
"Clearly wishful thinking. Kroos and especially Cesc is on another planet to Herrera.
To suggest those guys aren't game changers just speaks volumes of the whoever posted this tosh. "
I think it's more the fact that it's the defensive part of the midfield that needs looking at more than a Fabregas or Kroos signing dubbed.
posted on 25/8/14
Dubbed
I don't think you are quite getting what he is saying.
My guess is he is saying that untill we solve the DM position, Fabregas wouldn't make us that much better.
posted on 25/8/14
Great minds and all that VC
posted on 25/8/14
Fair enough. But he did say none of those were game changers. Which is laughable in itself.
posted on 25/8/14
Only a fabregas or kroos type CM could've potentially single handedly changed us due to them being able to control games. Di Maria is very much a luxury signing IMO
----------
Erm, okay?
Which Manchester United have you been watching?!
posted on 25/8/14
But he did say none of those were game changers. Which is laughable in itself.
..................
That one is very laughable and utterly stupid.
posted on 25/8/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 25/8/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 25/8/14
I think it's more the fact that it's the defensive part of the midfield that needs looking at more than a Fabregas or Kroos signing dubbed.
_______________________________
Our entire midfield is broken. Our CMs don't offer defensive protection, they don't offer any physicality, they can't control the midfield and they're not creating chances for our attackers.
A Kroos and Fabregas alone won't have solved all these problems but they would've more than sovled a couple of them.
Herrera isn't as good as those 2 but he is certainly better than what we currently have so he was a good enough signing. Just a shame we paid more for him than Chelsea and Real paid for Fabregas and kroos
posted on 25/8/14
Ah. There we have it. The mystery poster shows himself.
Please refrain from attributing the word 'daft' to someone else after your mare.
Fact of the matter is. A player like Cesc or Kroos would take your midfield to another level. Sure you need to shore up the midfield with a defensive mid too. But from what I've seen from your matches, you severely lack creativity from the CM position, along with the flanks too of course. You've addressed that to a degree with Di Maria now.
And of course Cesc ain't the same type of match winner as Di Maria mainly cause they're completely different players who play in different positions. But Cesc can change a game in a blink of an eye with a pass or goal. So it's idiotic to suggest he ain't a gamechanger.
posted on 25/8/14
Fabregas would have been perfect for Man U..Moyes knew this very well..The amount of chances he would create with RVP, Rooney and Mata would be unbelievable..He would need someone to do the donkey work for him ..and Man u are stocked with those type of players..I think Fabregas would have suited Man U better then any team in Prem.
Page 2 of 3