Hear, Hear, Pegdog, I understand that the main stumbling block is paying off the contract in which ever way. Once again penny wise and pound foolish in my mind. You keep onto a manager who has lost it for too long so as not to pay up his contract and you end up relegated with ALL the losses in revenue that would entail. I thought we were being well run by good businessmen, perhaps we are not so fortunate.
The reason we won against Tranmere was that we seemed to have a "shoot on sight" policy for that game, which appears to have been lacking in the games since. Please can we adopt it for tonights game.
good for you
lets hope we arent coming on later saying the same old things that never change!
the reason we beat Tranmere is we were able to play are passing game a game we seem unable to play in the league.
On the up side Stock, Hayter, O'connor and martis have all returned to training.
As for SOD i believe he has earned the right to stay on as manager he has proven people wrong time and time again, and their is not a manager out their who could get anything more out of the club then he has considering our small budget and the amount of injuries we have suffered in recent months.
Start counting down for SOD boys
Same old story again against Leeds. SOD commented that he was upset at the outcome. We were 1-0 up running the show and then Leeds changed the way they were playing." Hello its allowed" its what your supposed to do when your behind. The Leeds Staff made good use of their changes, you once again old son blew it. Harsh but true.
lets be honest he didn't exactly have game changing players on the bench so not much he could do
I said the same at the match, who would have gone up front if Hayter couldnt have done the full match?
exactly, the only creative player we had on the bench was stock and im not convinced he was match fit
If he had been he would have started.
Hopefully he will be included on saturday.
Also we should have number 26(Lanzo) avaialble again
It would have been ironic though wouldnt it if Wilsons block buster had gone in at 1-1 though wouldnt it.
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
Next Win Due 1st October
Page 1 of 1
posted on 23/8/11
Hear, Hear, Pegdog, I understand that the main stumbling block is paying off the contract in which ever way. Once again penny wise and pound foolish in my mind. You keep onto a manager who has lost it for too long so as not to pay up his contract and you end up relegated with ALL the losses in revenue that would entail. I thought we were being well run by good businessmen, perhaps we are not so fortunate.
posted on 23/8/11
The reason we won against Tranmere was that we seemed to have a "shoot on sight" policy for that game, which appears to have been lacking in the games since. Please can we adopt it for tonights game.
posted on 23/8/11
good for you
lets hope we arent coming on later saying the same old things that never change!
posted on 23/8/11
the reason we beat Tranmere is we were able to play are passing game a game we seem unable to play in the league.
On the up side Stock, Hayter, O'connor and martis have all returned to training.
As for SOD i believe he has earned the right to stay on as manager he has proven people wrong time and time again, and their is not a manager out their who could get anything more out of the club then he has considering our small budget and the amount of injuries we have suffered in recent months.
posted on 23/8/11
Start counting down for SOD boys
posted on 24/8/11
Same old story again against Leeds. SOD commented that he was upset at the outcome. We were 1-0 up running the show and then Leeds changed the way they were playing." Hello its allowed" its what your supposed to do when your behind. The Leeds Staff made good use of their changes, you once again old son blew it. Harsh but true.
posted on 24/8/11
lets be honest he didn't exactly have game changing players on the bench so not much he could do
posted on 24/8/11
I said the same at the match, who would have gone up front if Hayter couldnt have done the full match?
posted on 24/8/11
exactly, the only creative player we had on the bench was stock and im not convinced he was match fit
posted on 24/8/11
If he had been he would have started.
Hopefully he will be included on saturday.
Also we should have number 26(Lanzo) avaialble again
It would have been ironic though wouldnt it if Wilsons block buster had gone in at 1-1 though wouldnt it.
Page 1 of 1