or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 86 comments are related to an article called:

Comedy Gold By TOOR - Enjoy

Page 2 of 4

posted on 1/10/14

The honest truth is that people who rate Gerrard higher than Scholes do not know a lot about football. It is fine turning up and scoring screamers (Scholes has a better highlight reel by the way) but the positional awareness and discipline to play and own central midfield in a club the size and magnitude of Utd is no mean feat.

Like Fergie said, Stevie never got a kick when he came up against Scholes and Keane even Anderson. When you listen to former professionals and key men in the game they will tell you the same.

Carragher of course will rate Gerrard highly because he was a limited footballer without a lot of intelligence.

If Gerrard was this midfield Guru why did Rafa play him everywhere else most of the time instead of midfield. He brought in Alonso and Mascherano instead.

Gerrard is a quality player, no doubt but comparisons to Scholes are laughable and unfair to Gerrard due to his limited ability and discipline in his supposed 'best role' in midfield.

posted on 1/10/14

Gerrard was a more effective box to box and back again midfielder.

Sadly this is now seen as a thing of greatness.

They are widely sought after, Toure being best of the bunch.

But give me the vision of a Scholes or Fabregas any day of the week.

posted on 1/10/14

I don't want to get involved in another pointless conversation that has been done a million times before but Lampard has won 2 league cups you have him down as none

posted on 1/10/14

"Gerrard was a more effective box to box and back again midfielder."

Was he?

Played on the right of midfield for a while, before moving into a more advanced role ahead of two central midfielders.

He was excellent, but throughout that period, he wasn't a box to box midfielder.

I think he could have been, but his manager didn't use him that way.

Scholes played in a 4-4-2 as one of the central pairing, surely making him more of a box to box midfielder for several seasons?

posted on 1/10/14

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 1/10/14

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 1/10/14

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 27 minutes ago
"Gerrard was a more effective box to box and back again midfielder."

Was he?
----------------------------------------------
I was being tactful.

He was also what is described as swashbuckling which in my book means getting in the way.

posted on 1/10/14

Clever - son son son - 'Falcoff, it's only a mata of time before we have our Rojo back for Shaw. (U18599)

I don't have Vidicschin filtered, but the post above is filtered.

I think someone is on the wind up.

Is pretending to be another user allowed on this site?

posted on 1/10/14

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 1/10/14

posted on 1/10/14

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 1/10/14

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 1/10/14

No crying to admins anyone as RAP is under a betting oath here.

posted on 1/10/14

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 1/10/14

TBAG

YOU

ARE

A
































GENIUS!

posted on 1/10/14

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 1/10/14

Vidicschin.



That's the name you get for having no football knowledge

comment by T-BAD (U11806)

posted on 1/10/14

posted on 1/10/14

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by IAmMe (U18491)

posted on 1/10/14

posted on 1/10/14

RAP

posted on 1/10/14

RAP

You buffoon.

posted on 1/10/14

Put Gerrard in the United teams Scholes played in he'd have won even more than Scholes did.

....................

This is quite possibly the funniest comment I have seen on here for some time.

posted on 1/10/14

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 1/10/14

VC meet VC

Page 2 of 4

Sign in if you want to comment