Just to add, the article was lost in translation and he didn't actually state he's that high up the list.
The question to Hazard was if he considers him to be one of the top 5 players in the world. Hazard says he is not yet among the top 5. He lists 5 players he thinks is better than him to reinforce his earlier point
Lump of celery
And to people who think hazard is better at Chelsea than robben was that's absolute nonsense. I can only assume those people are in their teens? Robben despite injuries was electric, scored goals, went past a player near enough every time he got the ball and set up goals. One of the best players I've seen.
And bk I don't think I said hazard as underrated, neymar is a flat track bully for me who gets lucky with defenders backing of on him and he seems to be overprotected by refs. Great player but not to the hype where people think he would of challenged messi or Ronaldo.
comment by Darren The King Fletcher (U10026)
posted 9 hours, 22 minutes ago
That would suggest Hazard is the best attacker in the prem. He's clearly not better than Silva and Aguero - won't mention Di Maria, who is obviously a better player, because it's early days in a new league and don't want to get ahead of myself proclaiming him the best player in the league like Arsenal fans did with Ozil.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hazard is the best attacker in the prem.
Hazard has not good enough end product.He is overrated and he slows games at times.Robben was better than Hazard but Hazard might surpass Robben as he is injury free.
Is he fack. He's probably not even the best attacker at Chelsea now you've signed Costa and Fabregas.
Aguero is comfortably superior to Hazard as well.
Darren although I would agree with you...aguero is a great striker. And probably ahead of hazard. And silva is a great assisted. Hazard if reaches his potential can do both! as an attacker(all round) hazard can be the best in the league
Yeah I agree that he can. But I disagree that he is. He's not shown enough to warrant the tag of best attacker in the league.
Maybe in time he will. Unless someone else better comes along.
constantly performs against big teams in tough matches
-------------------------------
Ibra doesn't do that. It's one of the main thing's he's criticized for
comment by Nickalopodis-BoomsObsession (U9257)
posted 5 hours, 11 minutes ago
Lump of celery
And to people who think hazard is better at Chelsea than robben was that's absolute nonsense. I can only assume those people are in their teens? Robben despite injuries was electric, scored goals, went past a player near enough every time he got the ball and set up goals. One of the best players I've seen.
And bk I don't think I said hazard as underrated, neymar is a flat track bully for me who gets lucky with defenders backing of on him and he seems to be overprotected by refs. Great player but not to the hype where people think he would of challenged messi or Ronaldo.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
feck off nick , I have been watching Chelsea before you were born you pathetic turddd
Hazard was the most creative player in the PL last season...a stat Robben never replicated while at Chelsea because because he spent too much time hiding in the physio's room....especially when we were up agst physical opponents.....
Hazard's stats are just as good if not better than Robben's when he was a Chelsea player
And Robben was playing in a miles better Chelsea team......
Robben 15 league goals in 67 games
Hazard 24 league goals in 72 games
Not sure how many are in the league but Hazard has scored 16 penalties for us..
If that is true i would like to know how many of those penalties he won himself........
He is by far are best penalty earner
Not sure how many are in the league but Hazard has scored 16 penalties for us..
------
Belgian Lampard.
Two season ago in the league he scored 4 penalties out of a total of 14 league goals....
I seriously doubt he has scored 16 penalties in all comps for Chelsea.
Hazard 25 league goals of which 7 were penalties..
Lol biggish throwing his toys out the pram coz he loves hazard. Robben was a better player for us then. Hazard has been...so far.
If you been watching Chelsea before I was born then grow up you d!ckhead.
Robbens stats really are impressive considering his injuries
I don't love Hazard and I can quite happilly accept others thinking Robben was the better player than him while at Chelsea without reverting to calling them a teenager, something you clearly can not do
comment by Darren The King Fletcher (U10026)
posted 13 hours, 30 minutes ago
Is he fack. He's probably not even the best attacker at Chelsea now you've signed Costa and Fabregas.
Aguero is comfortably superior to Hazard as well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No way. Hazard's better than Silva, definitely. Him and Aguero play completely different roles, but I'd definitely rather have Hazard than Aguero.
Sorry, I just reread your post. 'Comfortably superior'? Seriously?
Sign in if you want to comment
Hazard...Number 6 in the world
Page 3 of 3
posted on 17/10/14
Hazard >>> Di Maria
posted on 17/10/14
Just to add, the article was lost in translation and he didn't actually state he's that high up the list.
The question to Hazard was if he considers him to be one of the top 5 players in the world. Hazard says he is not yet among the top 5. He lists 5 players he thinks is better than him to reinforce his earlier point
posted on 17/10/14
Lump of celery
And to people who think hazard is better at Chelsea than robben was that's absolute nonsense. I can only assume those people are in their teens? Robben despite injuries was electric, scored goals, went past a player near enough every time he got the ball and set up goals. One of the best players I've seen.
And bk I don't think I said hazard as underrated, neymar is a flat track bully for me who gets lucky with defenders backing of on him and he seems to be overprotected by refs. Great player but not to the hype where people think he would of challenged messi or Ronaldo.
posted on 17/10/14
comment by Darren The King Fletcher (U10026)
posted 9 hours, 22 minutes ago
That would suggest Hazard is the best attacker in the prem. He's clearly not better than Silva and Aguero - won't mention Di Maria, who is obviously a better player, because it's early days in a new league and don't want to get ahead of myself proclaiming him the best player in the league like Arsenal fans did with Ozil.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hazard is the best attacker in the prem.
posted on 17/10/14
Hazard has not good enough end product.He is overrated and he slows games at times.Robben was better than Hazard but Hazard might surpass Robben as he is injury free.
posted on 17/10/14
Is he fack. He's probably not even the best attacker at Chelsea now you've signed Costa and Fabregas.
Aguero is comfortably superior to Hazard as well.
posted on 17/10/14
Darren although I would agree with you...aguero is a great striker. And probably ahead of hazard. And silva is a great assisted. Hazard if reaches his potential can do both! as an attacker(all round) hazard can be the best in the league
posted on 17/10/14
Yeah I agree that he can. But I disagree that he is. He's not shown enough to warrant the tag of best attacker in the league.
Maybe in time he will. Unless someone else better comes along.
posted on 17/10/14
constantly performs against big teams in tough matches
-------------------------------
Ibra doesn't do that. It's one of the main thing's he's criticized for
posted on 17/10/14
comment by Nickalopodis-BoomsObsession (U9257)
posted 5 hours, 11 minutes ago
Lump of celery
And to people who think hazard is better at Chelsea than robben was that's absolute nonsense. I can only assume those people are in their teens? Robben despite injuries was electric, scored goals, went past a player near enough every time he got the ball and set up goals. One of the best players I've seen.
And bk I don't think I said hazard as underrated, neymar is a flat track bully for me who gets lucky with defenders backing of on him and he seems to be overprotected by refs. Great player but not to the hype where people think he would of challenged messi or Ronaldo.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
feck off nick , I have been watching Chelsea before you were born you pathetic turddd
Hazard was the most creative player in the PL last season...a stat Robben never replicated while at Chelsea because because he spent too much time hiding in the physio's room....especially when we were up agst physical opponents.....
Hazard's stats are just as good if not better than Robben's when he was a Chelsea player
And Robben was playing in a miles better Chelsea team......
posted on 17/10/14
Robben 15 league goals in 67 games
Hazard 24 league goals in 72 games
posted on 17/10/14
Not sure how many are in the league but Hazard has scored 16 penalties for us..
posted on 17/10/14
If that is true i would like to know how many of those penalties he won himself........
He is by far are best penalty earner
posted on 17/10/14
Not sure how many are in the league but Hazard has scored 16 penalties for us..
------
Belgian Lampard.
posted on 17/10/14
Two season ago in the league he scored 4 penalties out of a total of 14 league goals....
I seriously doubt he has scored 16 penalties in all comps for Chelsea.
posted on 17/10/14
Hazard 25 league goals of which 7 were penalties..
posted on 17/10/14
Lol biggish throwing his toys out the pram coz he loves hazard. Robben was a better player for us then. Hazard has been...so far.
If you been watching Chelsea before I was born then grow up you d!ckhead.
Robbens stats really are impressive considering his injuries
posted on 17/10/14
I don't love Hazard and I can quite happilly accept others thinking Robben was the better player than him while at Chelsea without reverting to calling them a teenager, something you clearly can not do
posted on 18/10/14
comment by Darren The King Fletcher (U10026)
posted 13 hours, 30 minutes ago
Is he fack. He's probably not even the best attacker at Chelsea now you've signed Costa and Fabregas.
Aguero is comfortably superior to Hazard as well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No way. Hazard's better than Silva, definitely. Him and Aguero play completely different roles, but I'd definitely rather have Hazard than Aguero.
posted on 18/10/14
Sorry, I just reread your post. 'Comfortably superior'? Seriously?
Page 3 of 3