COMEDY GOLD <rolf>
the gift that never stops this guy
Yes if we had SAS but instead we have the comedy club
What's the problem
Everyone on the sky sports panel has pretty much agreed
Yes we did, the chances came but lost to a quality keeper.
No they didn't Metro
Everyone has said United were worthy winners.
To lose 3-0 and then imply you were unlucky is the worst kind of bad loser.
It's not rocket science. We had more shots on target than United, so obviously if we weren't so wasteful we'd of beaten them.
I know you're here to wum, but you've failed miserably I'm afraid.
We had 8 very good chances to score at least 3 goals,
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
He's right.
Liverpool hammered United for chances.
It's a nonsensical statement. If they had done enough then they'd have won. Clearly they didn't.
comment by The RC - Football Expert & gentleman (U17921)
posted 9 seconds ago
No they didn't Metro
Everyone has said United were worthy winners.
To lose 3-0 and then imply you were unlucky is the worst kind of bad loser.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not being a bad loser at all. He didn't even say United didn't deserve to win. He said we were unlucky. You're all confused. No surprise there.....
Liverpool didn't deserve to win, the hardest thing in football is to score goals, and liverpool lacked the class to finish their chances.
We did. 19 shots and a man of the match goalkeeping performance. However mistakes cost us. Allen and Moreno, along with the goalkeeper diving before Rooney even shot for the first, the officials for the second and then Lovren and again Jones diving before the player had shot for the third. Woeful defending. Our attacking play was actually quite good but finishing along with an outstanding goalkeeper made the difference.
comment by Uncle Misery Guts (U16263)
posted 12 seconds ago
He's right.
Liverpool hammered United for chances.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Merely creating more chances than the other team does not mean you've done enough to win dumbo
comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)
posted 1 minute ago
It's a nonsensical statement. If they had done enough then they'd have won. Clearly they didn't.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you really as stupid as this?
Losing 3-0 and saying you 'did enough to win the game'
Delusion is a virus amongst followers of LFC.
See you chaps later
Liverpool were only unlucky with United's second goal. Apart from that, I don't see how bad finishing is bad luck. It's just bad finishing.
comment by Ron (U1646)
posted 19 seconds ago
Liverpool didn't deserve to win, the hardest thing in football is to score goals, and liverpool lacked the class to finish their chances.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He didn't say we deserved to win though
comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)
posted 2 minutes ago
Liverpool were only unlucky with United's second goal. Apart from that, I don't see how bad finishing is bad luck. It's just bad finishing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nobody said Liverpool were unlucky.
But you can do enough to win without actually winning. To say otherwise is beyond stupid.
Liverpool didn't deserve to win, the hardest thing in football is to score goals, and liverpool lacked the class to finish their chances.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He didn't say we deserved to win though
--------
A manager who loses a derby 3-0 can't say anything that fans will find acceptable.
Too much is made of a managers words.
comment by terminator1 (U1863)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Ron (U1646)
posted 19 seconds ago
Liverpool didn't deserve to win, the hardest thing in football is to score goals, and liverpool lacked the class to finish their chances.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He didn't say we deserved to win though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He said you did enough, you didn't... you conceded 3 goals, didn't score one because you defence is poor, and you lack the ability to score goals... its not unlucky that ballotelli hasnt scored a league goal
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)
posted 2 minutes ago
Liverpool were only unlucky with United's second goal. Apart from that, I don't see how bad finishing is bad luck. It's just bad finishing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nobody said Liverpool were unlucky.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think I misquoted Rodgers. I said unlucky when I meant we did enough to win....
Sign in if you want to comment
Rodgers "we did enough to win"
Page 1 of 4
posted on 14/12/14
COMEDY GOLD <rolf>
the gift that never stops this guy
posted on 14/12/14
Rodger's is a wum
posted on 14/12/14
Yes if we had SAS but instead we have the comedy club
posted on 14/12/14
What's the problem
Everyone on the sky sports panel has pretty much agreed
posted on 14/12/14
Yes we did, the chances came but lost to a quality keeper.
posted on 14/12/14
No they didn't Metro
Everyone has said United were worthy winners.
To lose 3-0 and then imply you were unlucky is the worst kind of bad loser.
posted on 14/12/14
It's not rocket science. We had more shots on target than United, so obviously if we weren't so wasteful we'd of beaten them.
I know you're here to wum, but you've failed miserably I'm afraid.
posted on 14/12/14
We had 8 very good chances to score at least 3 goals,
posted on 14/12/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 14/12/14
He's right.
Liverpool hammered United for chances.
posted on 14/12/14
It's a nonsensical statement. If they had done enough then they'd have won. Clearly they didn't.
posted on 14/12/14
comment by The RC - Football Expert & gentleman (U17921)
posted 9 seconds ago
No they didn't Metro
Everyone has said United were worthy winners.
To lose 3-0 and then imply you were unlucky is the worst kind of bad loser.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not being a bad loser at all. He didn't even say United didn't deserve to win. He said we were unlucky. You're all confused. No surprise there.....
posted on 14/12/14
Liverpool didn't deserve to win, the hardest thing in football is to score goals, and liverpool lacked the class to finish their chances.
posted on 14/12/14
We did. 19 shots and a man of the match goalkeeping performance. However mistakes cost us. Allen and Moreno, along with the goalkeeper diving before Rooney even shot for the first, the officials for the second and then Lovren and again Jones diving before the player had shot for the third. Woeful defending. Our attacking play was actually quite good but finishing along with an outstanding goalkeeper made the difference.
posted on 14/12/14
comment by Uncle Misery Guts (U16263)
posted 12 seconds ago
He's right.
Liverpool hammered United for chances.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Merely creating more chances than the other team does not mean you've done enough to win dumbo
posted on 14/12/14
comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)
posted 1 minute ago
It's a nonsensical statement. If they had done enough then they'd have won. Clearly they didn't.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you really as stupid as this?
posted on 14/12/14
Losing 3-0 and saying you 'did enough to win the game'
Delusion is a virus amongst followers of LFC.
See you chaps later
posted on 14/12/14
Liverpool were only unlucky with United's second goal. Apart from that, I don't see how bad finishing is bad luck. It's just bad finishing.
posted on 14/12/14
comment by Ron (U1646)
posted 19 seconds ago
Liverpool didn't deserve to win, the hardest thing in football is to score goals, and liverpool lacked the class to finish their chances.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He didn't say we deserved to win though
posted on 14/12/14
comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)
posted 2 minutes ago
Liverpool were only unlucky with United's second goal. Apart from that, I don't see how bad finishing is bad luck. It's just bad finishing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nobody said Liverpool were unlucky.
posted on 14/12/14
But you can do enough to win without actually winning. To say otherwise is beyond stupid.
posted on 14/12/14
Liverpool didn't deserve to win, the hardest thing in football is to score goals, and liverpool lacked the class to finish their chances.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He didn't say we deserved to win though
--------
posted on 14/12/14
A manager who loses a derby 3-0 can't say anything that fans will find acceptable.
Too much is made of a managers words.
posted on 14/12/14
comment by terminator1 (U1863)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Ron (U1646)
posted 19 seconds ago
Liverpool didn't deserve to win, the hardest thing in football is to score goals, and liverpool lacked the class to finish their chances.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He didn't say we deserved to win though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He said you did enough, you didn't... you conceded 3 goals, didn't score one because you defence is poor, and you lack the ability to score goals... its not unlucky that ballotelli hasnt scored a league goal
posted on 14/12/14
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)
posted 2 minutes ago
Liverpool were only unlucky with United's second goal. Apart from that, I don't see how bad finishing is bad luck. It's just bad finishing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nobody said Liverpool were unlucky.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think I misquoted Rodgers. I said unlucky when I meant we did enough to win....
Page 1 of 4