Weird though because Joel has been getting less minutes than Sanogo and Podolski, he would also bring in a decent transfer fee, more than we will get for the other 2 combined. You would have thought he'd be the first out the door.

Especially as Chubs came on instead of JC yesterday.

JC is a different player, we dont know what wengers seen in training

Could replace him with Cavani. Id be happy with that

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/arsenal/11321278/Arsenal-transfer-news-and-rumours-Gunners-lead-chase-for-Edinson-Cavani.html

I literally think sales of Podolski/Campbell will be used to fund defensive purchases, a shame because we need an option up front too.

campbell isnt for sale though

Gurjit ‏@GurjitAFC
According to @DiMarzio, Inter will pay €600k to loan Podolski. No option to buy included. #Arsenal

If true it is just so senseless.

DJ, that should be sorted for you.

comment by Genius at work, his name is Thierry Henry (U18355)
posted 5 seconds ago
Gurjit ‏@GurjitAFC
According to @DiMarzio, Inter will pay €600k to loan Podolski. No option to buy included. #Arsenal

If true it is just so senseless.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

wait till after the transfer window before deciding. it will have its reasons

Cheers Ads.

comment by Genius at work, his name is Thierry Henry (U18355)
posted 57 seconds ago
Gurjit ‏@GurjitAFC
According to @DiMarzio, Inter will pay €600k to loan Podolski. No option to buy included. #Arsenal

If true it is just so senseless.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Doesn't really match what Wenger said yesterday. If that is true I would hate to think what the original bid was.

Could someone in the know tell how long Campbell's contract has to run.

2016 unless he has extended it.

summer next year

comment by Genius at work, his name is Thierry Henry (U18355)
posted 3 minutes ago
Gurjit ‏@GurjitAFC
According to @DiMarzio, Inter will pay €600k to loan Podolski. No option to buy included. #Arsenal

If true it is just so senseless.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
it makes perfect sense to get rid of a player who isn't happy and isn't in favour.

Cheers Dj, Digby.

I mean no option to buy.

at the end of the day we have a budget, £100k a week is a joke for bench player

Only reason that would be acceptable is if we need squad space.

Indicates a replacement on the way or is that just wishful thinking?

Yeah, better leave the sinking boat and the manager that does not trust you.

its 100K a week we can straight away offer to someone

Rosicky is on something like £80K and has probably played in less games than Podolski this season.

What the point of loaning a player. Just sell him ffs if you don't want him to stay. Come summer we will be bk where we started.

comment by BO$$™ (U6401)
posted 5 seconds ago
What the point of loaning a player. Just sell him ffs if you don't want him to stay. Come summer we will be bk where we started.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No-one wants to buy him at this time.

comment by Genius at work, his name is Thierry Henry (U18355)
posted 25 seconds ago
Rosicky is on something like £80K and has probably played in less games than Podolski this season.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

same amount of starts with 2, podolski has had 5 more subs