ffs I definitely deleted that extra 0.

DIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

Park 900 comments to early.

1. You got relegated due to a walkover. Do you think something should be done about this?

I wasn't relegated, relegated implies a level of incompetence. I dove. In a way, I simply enacted what everyone wants to do in this life and sink down to the warmest point.

To suggest relegation is to suggest wrong doing. I did right. Me, the board, the players and the fans wanted to go to Division 2 because quite frankly the other teams in Div 1 play boring static football. Turgid crap quite frankly.

I can make these comments because my team play some fantastic flowing stuff. It flows better than Rap's diarrhoea post-curry night.

2. Are referees fit enough to keep up with the modern game these days?

No. They tend to be as old as LC. As lazy as Rap. As drunk as Tbag. As short as Leiva. As bribe-able as Tino. And as short tempered as Mex.

It's ridiculous that they're allowed anywhere close to the pitch in all honesty.

What we need is robot referees. "Beep boop," they'd say, "yellow for Rooney, beep boop.

If that seems to inhuman, we can bring along some sharpies and draw smiley faces on them. "Beep boop," they'd say, grinning maniacally, "yellow for Rooney." This is the only solution to the ptobelm of no refs.

Ultimately, I want to see this robot revolution spread across the whole of football. It would make for a much better experience. "Beep boob," says robot Rooney, "beep boop". Except he'd probably say something more like, "01000010 01100101 01100101 01110000 00100000 01100010 01101111 01101111 01110000."

3. If your number 1 penalty taker missed a couple in a row. Would you change the taker to someone else?

Robots can't miss penalties.

4. Give me an assessment on your team?

comment by TBAG. (U11806)
posted 19 minutes ago
tighter than Haaks cousin
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh god my balls

comment by Park - LATBag (U13708)
posted 2 minutes ago
Robots can't miss penalties.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Strengths -

1) Can be robotised.
2) Lots of scrap metal and wiring for robotisation.
3) Robots can be the future.
4) Currently in positive talks with Sargent Bash, who would really stiffen up my defence.

Weaknesses -

1) Flesh and bone.
2) Ethics and morals
3) Existentialism
4) C3P0 can't play in the hole.

comment by Park - LATBag (U13708)
posted less than a minute ago

4) C3P0 can't play in the hole.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I bet he can

comment by Back, sack and HaaK (U11574)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Park - LATBag (U13708)
posted less than a minute ago

4) C3P0 can't play in the hole.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I bet he can
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah, he was always more of a Han Man. R2D2 was more of a hole mole, what do you think the D stands for in his name?!

You're gayer than C3P0

.

Last question ,

5. Any team in the league (other than yours) would you like to manage?

I'd take over Spack's team, or Ludy's.

If I was FL Fart I could still use my own players in the Merger Cup (which we're gonna smash), and if I were in charge of Taiwan I would've at least tried in the last 'dead rubber' game

Thanks for your time Park .

Next!

Anyone?

hello

1. Fishguard are one of the surprise packages in the league. How do you feel about this?

A. I think that my finishing position was genuinely based on luck with the fruity. Generally my slots appeared to be 3/7 or 4/6 before home advantage, so especially away from home I was up against it.

What I miss I believe is a recognised big player or two. However, this is not my style and I believe I have much quality in my team and depth on my bench, and as players earn a move to bigger clubs/leagues IRL I fully anticipate a move in how my team is viewed and in terms of performances.

2. Fines for been over critical after matches where do you stand on this?

A. Nah, not in agreement with this. However, I do think that there should be no flak pointed at those who work hard to get results out on a weekly basis. I appreciate the effort and suggest that whilst constructive points back and forth are healthy, in general sometimes you just need to take a loss on the chin, and improve your team/tactics to force whomever is doing results to have no choice but to increase the number of win slots your team deserves

3. A winter world cup in the middle of the season means teams will lose key players. Are you angry about this?