Brown is quite easily the most vile and violent player in Scotland
=========

guy kicked him in the face and browns the violent one aye?

didn't cifti get pulled up for spitting as well?

but aye, that scott brown

________________________

Dish

comment by NNH - SCENES (U10730)
posted 1 minute ago
Nobody has mentioned Ryan McGowan's leg breaker on Stokes either, studs up on a planted leg.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

no no no

they don't want to talk about that.

non old firm fans seem to have delusions of being fair minded btw

They have their 'eyes shut' too.





I'm still laughing at the fact that was used in an argument to consider it a red card

rnr - the Butcher tackle I've not mentioned because I've not seen it again other than at the match.

The McGowan tackle was an ugly, clumsy tackle.

Brown's ticks every box for a red. Simple as that.

no wonder ur laughing

mcgowans on stokes was worse than browns, then their player kicks someone on the head, then another dives and wins a penalty

then they call our players cheats laughable

the McGowan tackle was an ugly, clumsy tackle.

Brown's ticks every box for a red. Simple as that.
=============

In some ways McGowans is actually worse , at least brown plays the ball

The McGowan tackle was an ugly, clumsy tackle.
==========

brown went for the ball as does McGowan

but only one is clumsy?

brown pure meant it I assume?

mcgowans was worse

comment by NNH - SCENES (U10730)
posted 1 minute ago
They have their 'eyes shut' too.





I'm still laughing at the fact that was used in an argument to consider it a red card
----------------------------------------------------------------------


Feck me, he didn't exactly only have eyes for the ball did he?

Go on then, tell me what kind of tackle constitutes a red card?

he closes his eyes because there is impact , we all do it

he didnt run into the tackle with his eyes shut ffs

Go on then, tell me what kind of tackle constitutes a red card?

You're the expert

rnr - the Butcher tackle I've not mentioned because I've not seen it again other than at the match.

The McGowan tackle was an ugly, clumsy tackle.

Brown's ticks every box for a red. Simple as that.

_________________________

Only Brown's is a red then, glad we cleared that up

Ciftci is an angel on the pitch, right Anybody who cant see Brown make terrible fouls in most if not every game is deluded.

I know Ciftci is an eejit too, but Brown gets away with murder, where as Ciftci doesn't he gets punished. That's the difference, we suffer for it but Celtic do not simples.

so in short

Celtic are bad and should be punished

united can do what they want, including booting players in the face.

read that back btw, your player booted ours in the face.

class act

The McGowan tackle was an ugly, clumsy tackle.

______________________

In other words, reckless and dangerous BUT we just got on with it.

I'm only mentioning it because of the clear hypocrisy. AND I'm willing to bet you have seen Butchers tackle becuase you have seen everything else in that flare up

Is there any precedent of a player being cited for a horrendous tackle? Whilst Brown clearly should have been sent off, I don't think there's much chance of a player ever being retrospectively punished for a tackle/two-footed studs-up assault.

Quite glad Butcher appears to be getting away with reacting, and Connolly isn't being punished for being fouled in the box. Will be disappointed if van Dijk wins his appeal though, as there were two red card worthy infractions in that incident - the boot onto Butcher's shin and the petulant kick-out when he was on the ground that caused Butcher to react.

Aw for christ sake

Rnr, where would I have seen it? It wasn't on the highlights and I was at the game so didn't have the benefit of replays.

And regardless if McGowans tackle was a red or not, it was a very different tackle than Brown's ffs.

Off the ground
Out of control
Studs showing
Coming through the man to get the ball

But not a red? Seriously?

The Green tinted glasses are not coming off are they?

Keny, which United supporter on here has said Ciftci shouldn't be banned?

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Will be disappointed if van Dijk wins his appeal though, as there were two red card worthy infractions in that incident


ffs.

Ah well, the agreements wouldn't last long

not talking about banning Ivan, though I cant recall what the few united fans on here have said individually on the matter, thought cause and effect seems to be a good excuse.

its in general, browns this browns that.

Cifti's worse but that cant possibly be true because he is a united player.

You have said on this thread 'And it was a red card all day long.' about VVD, so you have seen that, but haven't seen the challenge which took him to the ground 1 second previously? Anyway.

Get me a still image from the side of McGowan on Stokes. I bet you;

1, McGowans eyes were shut(LOL)

2, His studs are up and halfway up Stokes shin

3, Stokes leg is planted and bent back.

NOW, that's what you get when you get a still image of an 'ugly challenge'

I'm not disputing that Brown's wasn't reckless either and that another ref could have red carded him BUT, the ref who was right in front of it decided it was a fair tackle. All I'm doing is pointing out other tackles which are just as bad, there has been absolutely nothing said about McGowans or Butcher's lunge through the back of VVD, that's because it happens. The only reason imo Brown's tackle is being magnified is by what ensued and mainly as a small comeback argument for Ciftci booting him in the head

What part of that do you disagree with NNH? He brought his studs down on Butcher's outstretched shin, which is an offence worthy of a red card (some may argue yellow, but it's in the "seen them given" category). He also kicked Butcher on the ground, which again is an offence worthy of a red card. I said Butcher deserved to go for his kick-out too, so I'm being consistent.

I'm surprised that Butcher hasn't been cited, and that leads me to believe that the SFA will rescind van Dijk's red card, despite it being the correct decision to award him one (literally the only part of that incident the referee got right).

i'm honestly astounded at this btw

player dives for a pen, the other is involved with dijk and nothing is happening to either and you're still thinking you're hard done by despite a horrid tackle and a boot to the face of one of our players

mental