comment by derbymanc (U18914)
posted 44 seconds ago
Don't be daft, there's 1000's of different ways a fight can go, I wouldn't sit and write a list like that for my kids, never mind someone else's

I take it you'd like to see it stopped utterly and completely with a punishment of DQ's being dished out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

So what is the maximum for all types of fights then

You answer my question first, t t for tat and all that

Although are you seriously telling me that as a ref, you'd try and count every clinch in the middle of a fast flowing fight #deluded

Maybe they could appoint assistant refs to walk around the ring apron counting

Ooooh and then after everyone we could stop the fight whilst it cuts to a video replay to make sure they know who initiated the clinch.

Maybe bring in a better rule that states for every 3 clinches you get a free dig

comment by derbymanc (U18914)
posted 7 minutes ago
You answer my question first, t t for tat and all that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No

Or how about electric suits so if you go in for a clinch you get a mild shock.

Or to totally get you onside now,
for every clinch you have to submit to a drug test.

Not a man of your word I see.

wouldn't give you my word, your not worth it

We could automatically DQ anyone for clinching, be some great short fights then

You have been found out to be a Fraud, no wonder you like Mayweather

You can't be talking about me as i can't stand Mayweather.

As for fraud we found out that was you the other day 'quick all look at this REAL picture'

Or your brilliant conversations.

'Look this article says Floyds failed a test'
'Erm that says Rumour'
'No it's fact '

'Look D4, this article says Manny's scared of needles'
'that's just rumour, you can't say that '

Brilliant, never change little man you keep me entertained throughout the day.

Even RGS was not a weasely Fraud like yourself

Your just upset cause I've shown you up every day so far (and long will it continue).

that nasty Derby won't let me post my rubbish without asking for proof

As I say you keep entertaining me so keep it up.

So much so that I have to give this article 5 stars, the only way it could be better is if you suddenly posted a load more 'factual' pictures

Still being a cowardly weasel.
There are many people I have boxing disagreements with on this board but all of them had the courage of their convictions and argue what they believe.

You just run, hide, make excuses and lie.

I've spent the week arguing and disproving you, it's been fun.

Will be here again next week to do the same, etc etc etc.

You've still yet to give your opinion on that Montoya article nor put your point across referencing clinching, I even gave you some ideas cause we know you get stuck <patonthehead>

unless of course your only view is BAN FLOYD NOW, in which case we all know that's how you think............. we can read you like a book (just in case you need to know what one looks like https://bibliophilica.wordpress.com/2011/02/20/the-secret-life-of-walter-mitty-by-james-thurber/ , would suit you down to the ground too)

D4, Freddie looks like he is making early excuses. If he had faith in Manny's ability to take Floyd out, he would stay quiet.

However

Let's be honest here, this fight will be a controversial one, and the result will birth a lucrative rematch.

Is it excuses asking for a fair fight.
It is the bare minimum of what we should be asking for as fans

If its the bare minumiun, then its standard, and if Freddie is not understanding of what is standard then he needs to brush up. Fair Reffing goes without saying, Roach is being sly and influencing by proxy.

Unfortunately Floyd in his last fight was favoured by the ref and allowed to get away with excessive and deliberate clinching