Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
The FA not interested in pursuing it according to The Guardian.
As expected.
comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine(7) (U5768)
posted 1 hour, 59 minutes ago
Maybe it's because the pick and choose who they punish. Costa stamped on him and then in the same game Skrtel was punished, Rooney kicked out at Mignolet.
It does seem like clowns are making the decisions, how else can it be explained?
..........................................
The Roobey challenge was a yellow card type challenge, the FA don't give out bans for things deemed worthy of yellow cards.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We don't go by your rules. We go by the FA rules which says a kick out is a red card. Unfortunately as always, they pick and choose when to enforce them. Rooney does seem to get away with them though. I remember one game he ran half the length of the pitch and elbowed a player on the back of the head and got nothing. It's nothing out of the ordinary, I'm used to it.
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine(7) (U5768)
posted 1 hour, 59 minutes ago
Maybe it's because the pick and choose who they punish. Costa stamped on him and then in the same game Skrtel was punished, Rooney kicked out at Mignolet.
It does seem like clowns are making the decisions, how else can it be explained?
..........................................
The Roobey challenge was a yellow card type challenge, the FA don't give out bans for things deemed worthy of yellow cards.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We don't go by your rules. We go by the FA rules which says a kick out is a red card. Unfortunately as always, they pick and choose when to enforce them. Rooney does seem to get away with them though. I remember one game he ran half the length of the pitch and elbowed a player on the back of the head and got nothing. It's nothing out of the ordinary, I'm used to it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Same rooney who was banned for 3 games for saying the F word into a camera
Cos Slippy G has never done that
I remember one game he ran half the length of the pitch and elbowed a player on the back of the head and got nothing. It's nothing out of the ordinary, I'm used to it.
.................................................
If you are referring to the Wigan incident he run (but not half the length of the pitch) up the pitch as we were countering.
The Wigan player decided to obstruct his path so Rooney elbowed the guy (well actually it was more like his arm he hit him with)
Rooney got a yellow card..
So you were right apart from the majority of it
Also yes kicking out, not every time an oppositions players foot happens to touch an opposition player TOOR, thankfully the FA understand the rules far better than you...
Or more accurately, they just aren't as bitter as you
comment by Redvalk (U14242)
posted 6 hours, 34 minutes ago
De Gea play acting, you would of thought he been pole axed the way he behaved, and what about the tackle Jones on Hendersonanyway Skirtel should of known better and deserves the ban
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The only play acting I saw was from Mignolet,Rooney hardly touched him.
comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine(7) (U5768)
posted 27 minutes ago
I remember one game he ran half the length of the pitch and elbowed a player on the back of the head and got nothing. It's nothing out of the ordinary, I'm used to it.
.................................................
If you are referring to the Wigan incident he run (but not half the length of the pitch) up the pitch as we were countering.
The Wigan player decided to obstruct his path so Rooney elbowed the guy (well actually it was more like his arm he hit him with)
Rooney got a yellow card..
So you were right apart from the majority of it
Also yes kicking out, not every time an oppositions players foot happens to touch an opposition player TOOR, thankfully the FA understand the rules far better than you...
Or more accurately, they just aren't as bitter as you
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They didn't understand the rules when Rooney kicked Mignolet or when he elbowed the Wigan player on the head. Selective understanding of them, as I said.
comment by Alasnomoresmithandjones (U15157)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by Redvalk (U14242)
posted 6 hours, 34 minutes ago
De Gea play acting, you would of thought he been pole axed the way he behaved, and what about the tackle Jones on Hendersonanyway Skirtel should of known better and deserves the ban
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The only play acting I saw was from Mignolet,Rooney hardly touched him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He went flying into, probably no fault of his own as Skrtel pushed him but then kicked him. I'm not sure how that's acting injured, although it is you we are talking about here.
They didn't understand the rules when Rooney kicked Mignolet or when he elbowed the Wigan player on the head. Selective understanding of them, as I said.
.........................................................
TOOR you can't even remember what happened in the Rooney incident, and you certainly don't seem to understand what the rules where at the time...
The FA's rules stated that they couldn't change the referee's decision if he had seen and dealt with the incident. As the referee had given Rooney a yellow card he certainly had seen and dealt with the incident, meaning the FA by their very rules could not do anything.
Honestly if you are going to try and push a conspiracy theory at least get your basic facts right
The Rooney incident was no worse than the Balo one, I assume you wanted a red card for that one as well?
the Balo one, I assume you wanted a red card for that one as well?
------------------------
That didnt deserve anything, any player who has to be held back by his own fans deserve no cards just for entertainment purposes
I was on about him cynically scraping his boot down the back of Jones' leg when he was moving away from him...
At least I am pretty sure it was Balo...
to be fair he barley touched him if at all, and jones' dive after was awful
Did look for a video, none available, it was quite a cynical challenge though, ball had well gone Balo just got angry and scraped his studs down the back of his leg...
If you were going to start giving out reds for challenges like Rooney's on Mignolets then you would certainly have had to give a red for that!
I thought Jones' tackle on Henderson was naughty. It was late, reckless and high. Could, maybe should, have been booked in the first half as well.
Yeah I'd agree with that Robby, Jones could have certainly been walking for 2 yellows.
I felt like Atkinson was trying to keep the game 11 v 11 TBH, It was just that Gerrard gave him literally no choice.
Skrtel ban: couldn't happen to a nicer guy! I would not be surprised if Liverpool doesn't dump him at the end of the season.
comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine(7) (U5768)
posted 13 hours, 4 minutes ago
They didn't understand the rules when Rooney kicked Mignolet or when he elbowed the Wigan player on the head. Selective understanding of them, as I said.
.........................................................
TOOR you can't even remember what happened in the Rooney incident, and you certainly don't seem to understand what the rules where at the time...
The FA's rules stated that they couldn't change the referee's decision if he had seen and dealt with the incident. As the referee had given Rooney a yellow card he certainly had seen and dealt with the incident, meaning the FA by their very rules could not do anything.
Honestly if you are going to try and push a conspiracy theory at least get your basic facts right
The Rooney incident was no worse than the Balo one, I assume you wanted a red card for that one as well?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As I said they pick and choose. They changed the referees decision when Suarez bit Ivanovic.
The referee didn't give Suarez a card for the incident, he didn't see the bite. Come on TOOR if you are going to try and make up conspiracy theories at least try and get the basic facts right otherwise your conspiracy is dead before it's started!
comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine(7) (U5768)
posted 13 minutes ago
The referee didn't give Suarez a card for the incident, he didn't see the bite. Come on TOOR if you are going to try and make up conspiracy theories at least try and get the basic facts right otherwise your conspiracy is dead before it's started!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He gave a freekick and therefore acted on it. As I said they pick and choose.
No conspiracy just a widely recognised point that the FA pick and choose, always have done.
The referee didn't see the bite otherwise Suarez would have been sent off there and then. The referee specifically stated he had not seen the incident.
I don't see how lying about such a well known point advances your case here...
comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine(7) (U5768)
posted 2 hours, 48 minutes ago
The referee didn't see the bite otherwise Suarez would have been sent off there and then. The referee specifically stated he had not seen the incident.
I don't see how lying about such a well known point advances your case here...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The referee didn't see the elbow into the back of the head from Rooney otherwise it would have been a red card.
In 2006 Manchester City defender Ben Thatcher was suspended for eight games with a 15-match suspended ban by the Football Association for elbowing Portsmouth midfielder Pedro Mendes.
Thatcher was only booked at the time by referee Dermot Gallagher, but the FA circumvented its own rules to lodge a charge of "serious foul play" against Thatcher.
As I said they pick and choose, you trying to gloss over this fact does nothing to advance your case.
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 1 hour, 46 minutes ago
comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine(7) (U5768)
posted 2 hours, 48 minutes ago
The referee didn't see the bite otherwise Suarez would have been sent off there and then. The referee specifically stated he had not seen the incident.
I don't see how lying about such a well known point advances your case here...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The referee didn't see the elbow into the back of the head from Rooney otherwise it would have been a red card.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So remind me again what he gave Rooney the yellow card for?
TOOR this is getting pretty embarrassing for you now...
Sign in if you want to comment
skrtel banned
Page 3 of 4
posted on 25/3/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 25/3/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 25/3/15
The FA not interested in pursuing it according to The Guardian.
As expected.
posted on 25/3/15
comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine(7) (U5768)
posted 1 hour, 59 minutes ago
Maybe it's because the pick and choose who they punish. Costa stamped on him and then in the same game Skrtel was punished, Rooney kicked out at Mignolet.
It does seem like clowns are making the decisions, how else can it be explained?
..........................................
The Roobey challenge was a yellow card type challenge, the FA don't give out bans for things deemed worthy of yellow cards.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We don't go by your rules. We go by the FA rules which says a kick out is a red card. Unfortunately as always, they pick and choose when to enforce them. Rooney does seem to get away with them though. I remember one game he ran half the length of the pitch and elbowed a player on the back of the head and got nothing. It's nothing out of the ordinary, I'm used to it.
posted on 25/3/15
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine(7) (U5768)
posted 1 hour, 59 minutes ago
Maybe it's because the pick and choose who they punish. Costa stamped on him and then in the same game Skrtel was punished, Rooney kicked out at Mignolet.
It does seem like clowns are making the decisions, how else can it be explained?
..........................................
The Roobey challenge was a yellow card type challenge, the FA don't give out bans for things deemed worthy of yellow cards.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We don't go by your rules. We go by the FA rules which says a kick out is a red card. Unfortunately as always, they pick and choose when to enforce them. Rooney does seem to get away with them though. I remember one game he ran half the length of the pitch and elbowed a player on the back of the head and got nothing. It's nothing out of the ordinary, I'm used to it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Same rooney who was banned for 3 games for saying the F word into a camera
Cos Slippy G has never done that
posted on 25/3/15
I remember one game he ran half the length of the pitch and elbowed a player on the back of the head and got nothing. It's nothing out of the ordinary, I'm used to it.
.................................................
If you are referring to the Wigan incident he run (but not half the length of the pitch) up the pitch as we were countering.
The Wigan player decided to obstruct his path so Rooney elbowed the guy (well actually it was more like his arm he hit him with)
Rooney got a yellow card..
So you were right apart from the majority of it
Also yes kicking out, not every time an oppositions players foot happens to touch an opposition player TOOR, thankfully the FA understand the rules far better than you...
Or more accurately, they just aren't as bitter as you
posted on 25/3/15
comment by Redvalk (U14242)
posted 6 hours, 34 minutes ago
De Gea play acting, you would of thought he been pole axed the way he behaved, and what about the tackle Jones on Hendersonanyway Skirtel should of known better and deserves the ban
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The only play acting I saw was from Mignolet,Rooney hardly touched him.
posted on 25/3/15
comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine(7) (U5768)
posted 27 minutes ago
I remember one game he ran half the length of the pitch and elbowed a player on the back of the head and got nothing. It's nothing out of the ordinary, I'm used to it.
.................................................
If you are referring to the Wigan incident he run (but not half the length of the pitch) up the pitch as we were countering.
The Wigan player decided to obstruct his path so Rooney elbowed the guy (well actually it was more like his arm he hit him with)
Rooney got a yellow card..
So you were right apart from the majority of it
Also yes kicking out, not every time an oppositions players foot happens to touch an opposition player TOOR, thankfully the FA understand the rules far better than you...
Or more accurately, they just aren't as bitter as you
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They didn't understand the rules when Rooney kicked Mignolet or when he elbowed the Wigan player on the head. Selective understanding of them, as I said.
posted on 25/3/15
comment by Alasnomoresmithandjones (U15157)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by Redvalk (U14242)
posted 6 hours, 34 minutes ago
De Gea play acting, you would of thought he been pole axed the way he behaved, and what about the tackle Jones on Hendersonanyway Skirtel should of known better and deserves the ban
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The only play acting I saw was from Mignolet,Rooney hardly touched him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He went flying into, probably no fault of his own as Skrtel pushed him but then kicked him. I'm not sure how that's acting injured, although it is you we are talking about here.
posted on 25/3/15
They didn't understand the rules when Rooney kicked Mignolet or when he elbowed the Wigan player on the head. Selective understanding of them, as I said.
.........................................................
TOOR you can't even remember what happened in the Rooney incident, and you certainly don't seem to understand what the rules where at the time...
The FA's rules stated that they couldn't change the referee's decision if he had seen and dealt with the incident. As the referee had given Rooney a yellow card he certainly had seen and dealt with the incident, meaning the FA by their very rules could not do anything.
Honestly if you are going to try and push a conspiracy theory at least get your basic facts right
The Rooney incident was no worse than the Balo one, I assume you wanted a red card for that one as well?
posted on 25/3/15
the Balo one, I assume you wanted a red card for that one as well?
------------------------
That didnt deserve anything, any player who has to be held back by his own fans deserve no cards just for entertainment purposes
posted on 25/3/15
I was on about him cynically scraping his boot down the back of Jones' leg when he was moving away from him...
At least I am pretty sure it was Balo...
posted on 25/3/15
to be fair he barley touched him if at all, and jones' dive after was awful
posted on 25/3/15
Did look for a video, none available, it was quite a cynical challenge though, ball had well gone Balo just got angry and scraped his studs down the back of his leg...
If you were going to start giving out reds for challenges like Rooney's on Mignolets then you would certainly have had to give a red for that!
posted on 25/3/15
I thought Jones' tackle on Henderson was naughty. It was late, reckless and high. Could, maybe should, have been booked in the first half as well.
posted on 25/3/15
Yeah I'd agree with that Robby, Jones could have certainly been walking for 2 yellows.
I felt like Atkinson was trying to keep the game 11 v 11 TBH, It was just that Gerrard gave him literally no choice.
posted on 26/3/15
Skrtel ban: couldn't happen to a nicer guy! I would not be surprised if Liverpool doesn't dump him at the end of the season.
posted on 26/3/15
comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine(7) (U5768)
posted 13 hours, 4 minutes ago
They didn't understand the rules when Rooney kicked Mignolet or when he elbowed the Wigan player on the head. Selective understanding of them, as I said.
.........................................................
TOOR you can't even remember what happened in the Rooney incident, and you certainly don't seem to understand what the rules where at the time...
The FA's rules stated that they couldn't change the referee's decision if he had seen and dealt with the incident. As the referee had given Rooney a yellow card he certainly had seen and dealt with the incident, meaning the FA by their very rules could not do anything.
Honestly if you are going to try and push a conspiracy theory at least get your basic facts right
The Rooney incident was no worse than the Balo one, I assume you wanted a red card for that one as well?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As I said they pick and choose. They changed the referees decision when Suarez bit Ivanovic.
posted on 26/3/15
The referee didn't give Suarez a card for the incident, he didn't see the bite. Come on TOOR if you are going to try and make up conspiracy theories at least try and get the basic facts right otherwise your conspiracy is dead before it's started!
posted on 26/3/15
comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine(7) (U5768)
posted 13 minutes ago
The referee didn't give Suarez a card for the incident, he didn't see the bite. Come on TOOR if you are going to try and make up conspiracy theories at least try and get the basic facts right otherwise your conspiracy is dead before it's started!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He gave a freekick and therefore acted on it. As I said they pick and choose.
posted on 26/3/15
No conspiracy just a widely recognised point that the FA pick and choose, always have done.
posted on 26/3/15
The referee didn't see the bite otherwise Suarez would have been sent off there and then. The referee specifically stated he had not seen the incident.
I don't see how lying about such a well known point advances your case here...
posted on 26/3/15
comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine(7) (U5768)
posted 2 hours, 48 minutes ago
The referee didn't see the bite otherwise Suarez would have been sent off there and then. The referee specifically stated he had not seen the incident.
I don't see how lying about such a well known point advances your case here...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The referee didn't see the elbow into the back of the head from Rooney otherwise it would have been a red card.
posted on 26/3/15
In 2006 Manchester City defender Ben Thatcher was suspended for eight games with a 15-match suspended ban by the Football Association for elbowing Portsmouth midfielder Pedro Mendes.
Thatcher was only booked at the time by referee Dermot Gallagher, but the FA circumvented its own rules to lodge a charge of "serious foul play" against Thatcher.
As I said they pick and choose, you trying to gloss over this fact does nothing to advance your case.
posted on 26/3/15
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 1 hour, 46 minutes ago
comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine(7) (U5768)
posted 2 hours, 48 minutes ago
The referee didn't see the bite otherwise Suarez would have been sent off there and then. The referee specifically stated he had not seen the incident.
I don't see how lying about such a well known point advances your case here...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The referee didn't see the elbow into the back of the head from Rooney otherwise it would have been a red card.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So remind me again what he gave Rooney the yellow card for?
TOOR this is getting pretty embarrassing for you now...
Page 3 of 4