or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 157 comments are related to an article called:

Chelsea

Page 6 of 7

posted on 10/4/15

Yannick Stopyra, that's a blast from the past

posted on 10/4/15

comment by Cinciwolf (U11551) posted 5 hours, 43 minutes ago
Bit confused to be honest.

Is he a Chelsea fan? Doesn't he hate the midlands? Why is he advertising it in his name?
----------------------------------------------------------------

I quite like the Midlands - just not the Black Country bit of it!

And I hate my accent getting confused with it

posted on 10/4/15

Chelsea were best when every player had a name starting with H. Hollins, Houseman, Hughes, Hutchinson, Hosgood, Harris, maybe others that the clouds of time have allowed me to forget.

posted on 10/4/15

This sounds a bit ukipish

posted on 10/4/15

Sounds a bit EDLish

Which would fit right in with the average Chelsea thug in a train carriage.

posted on 10/4/15

It Won't be a Steam train like you're still on

posted on 10/4/15

comment by TheChameleonProject (U1847)
posted 14 minutes ago
It Won't be a Steam train like you're still on
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yeah Unc. The key words are capitalised for extra sassiness.

posted on 10/4/15

Muto

posted on 10/4/15

comment by Superb (U6486)

posted on 10/4/15

Muto > Mutu

comment by Superb (U6486)

posted on 10/4/15

Muto doesn't like the bugle

posted on 10/4/15

No one likes Pundits Big Nose

posted on 10/4/15

Sushi

posted on 11/4/15

Bless you

posted on 11/4/15

Fantastic article, Chelsea just can't help to find ways to ruin football.

posted on 11/4/15

Nearly all slaves in Roman times were foreign.

It's only normal for nearly all slaves in Roman's times to be foreign.

comment by Superb (U6486)

posted on 11/4/15

We've always had a good representative of English players in the Roman era apart from this season when we only have two in the starting 11.

I'm sure that's something the club will want to address and are well aware of. Anyway as someone else pointed out a couple of other top PL teams fielded less English players last weekend than us so why are we being singled out?

Could it be because the OP is a non entity with a serious Chelsea obsession.

posted on 11/4/15

Vladiators

posted on 11/4/15

My opinion as another Wolves fan is that it the number of foreign players in the PL makes me much less inclined to watch it than a few years ago. It's not a Chelsea problem but a general problem.

I feel a detachment watching teams of foreign multi-millionaires who seem determined to change football to a non-contact sport.

I ask myself if we were bought by a billionaire who did an Abramovich would I not care and enjoy the success or would it spoil the love of my club by turning it into something "less real"? Do I prefer watching a number of our home grown youngsters battle for promotion or would I prefer to be a Chelsea or Man City? The trophies must be fantastic but what about the downside - the armchair fans, inflated prices, the club turning into a PLC rather than something I see as a love and a duty.

I can't answer those questions as we haven't been there.

posted on 11/4/15

How are you with neighbourhoods

comment by Superb (U6486)

posted on 11/4/15

It's all well and good saying more English players but in these FFP times when every penny has to be accounted for why would you pay for an overpriced English player when you can get a cheaper (and most likely better) foreign player.

English players are more expensive than players from abroad so if the FA or Premier League really want to address this problem then they're going to have to do something about the overinflated prices of English players.

We'd also see more English players bought by foreign clubs and getting fantastic experience of foreign leagues if that happened.

posted on 11/4/15

That's a fair point.

All I'm saying is that I don't have much interest in watching 2 teams of foreign players competing on Sky on Sunday afternoons.

Some people do - that's their choice.

posted on 11/4/15

The premier league is a victim if it's own success in terms of overinflated prices. Whilst there is such a chasm between the clubs at the top of the pyramid and the clubs at the bottom, with so much money in the game, lower clubs are always going to demand more for players that have come through their youth system so they are able to compete. This is true of foreign players clubs import too, whose value seems to increase as soon as they play regularly in the Premier League regardless of whether they improve in ability.

Unfortunately, this means clubs now look abroad a lot of the time for purchases, which only exacerbates the problem. I guess the only way it will change is to either decrease the number of foreign imports or evenly spread the money that now only the top clubs are getting in terms of TV rights etc. Neither of which are going to happen.

comment by JFDI (U1657)

posted on 11/4/15

When Chelsea were lower league, the old division 1/ division 2 etc, days I never watched the top league either.

Nothing to do with foreign players, wages style or anything else. It was simply because my interest was Chelsea and they were in the 2nd division, the teams within that, the gams within that were what mattered.

Today I pay little but a passing attention to the Championship. Nothing to do with a lack of respect, style or foreign players, just simply a lack of interest. My interest is in the league we play in and the teams within that, be they Hull, Wigan, Norwich, Wolves as they come and go or your Man U, Arsenal or Liverpool's.

posted on 11/4/15

I remember when we both got promotion, going up as 1st and 2nd. I think the final match of the season we played each other at Molineux.

Page 6 of 7

Sign in if you want to comment