Depends on the exchange rate

£35m minimum. Spend £20m of that on Bolasie and then focus on the striker situation.

I would.push for 50 but gladly take 35 mil. But will we get that?

Fbk I agree. If bolaise gets his shooting right that guy will be lethal

IMO we would get 30m max.

Still has 2 years left. Starting bid at 40m.

Only way we will get top sterling, ignore the pun, is if we can get a bidding war going

£45 mil? No offence but are you people insane. He's been woeful this year and with English tax you'll probably get between 25-30.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Stretty - Mata is the Juan (U3123)
posted 1 minute ago
£45 mil? No offence but are you people insane. He's been woeful this year and with English tax you'll probably get between 25-30.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
No one thinks he's worth that. We don't want to sell, he has two years left. We can ask whatever we want. We'd still get 20m if we kept him another year.

£30-35m

Bolasie

when you say you will demand £40m minimum, exactly who is going to pay that?

are you selling to united?
do chelsea need him?
with ozil/welbeck/sanchez/cazorla/walcott/oxlade/rosicky do arsenal not have enough forward players?
man city i will give you.

some foreign clubs might want him - but he is nowhere near good enough for the big two in spain - but does raheem strike you as the kind of guy who wants a new challenge abroad, to learn a new language, immerse himself in the culture, thrive in a new league?

so where is this £40m coming from?

Stretty we agree. But I think it may be funny now just to do to him what we did to Luis suarez. And as term said can still get 20 mil a year later unless he continues to play gasssh like he has since Xmas

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Around 30. After the season he's had and him wanting to leave 40 is dreaming. Look how much Costa and Sanchez went for. City might stump up 35.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

his form isn't worth £40m but this lad is 20 years old. If he continues to develop the way he is doing he will soon become worth more than that so yeah £40m is a fair price

Poor raheem. Funny how this was not leaked by his agent before games at anfield even though he told br before the Chelsea game.

But should we be surprised. This is the same.agent who represent bernaihno at wba and look how badly his or has gone

Personally i'd push for £45m but would probably accept £40m

I still think there's a good chance that he may stay if City or whoever don't meet our asking price. Could turn ugly next season if so.

I think FSG will do their part and dig their heels in

comment by The Kaiser's Trainers (U5676)
posted 43 seconds ago
I think FSG will do their part and dig their heels in
----------------------------------------------------------------------
perhaps, but then future players are really going to think twice before joining you, especially after the suarez has no buyout clause lie.

well after we got Suarez his dream move to Barca and stopped him from making the horrible mistake of joining Arsenal.....I don't think players will mind.

We're the best stepping stone in football