Credit to him for getting his first hatrick ever gor us. Stull think we should be looking for better though
Everybody has given him credit. He would get more credit if these performances were the norm, as opposed to his WBA and Norwich performances
comment by I am gooner now (U16927)
posted 10 minutes ago
Credit to him for getting his first hatrick ever gor us. Stull think we should be looking for better though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok but who is available to buy that's currently producing better than a goal a game?
Bats
Last night he done mostly what he always does. The difference was the team played with him brilliantly. Last night we actually tailored our game to Giroud instead of playing and totally forgetting he's not Theo. The team set 'em up and he knocked 'em down.
comment by WengersBodyguard2 (U8276)
posted 52 seconds ago
Bats
Last night he done mostly what he always does. The difference was the team played with him brilliantly. Last night we actually tailored our game to Giroud instead of playing and totally forgetting he's not Theo. The team set 'em up and he knocked 'em down.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly. Bats doesnt understand that and probably will never.
Olivier Giroud put us through the next CL round. He cost us 12 M and won us yesterday 20M. Haters going to hate. I don't care. Happy for him and firstly Arsenal
Guessing by this article the op is taking back all his comments on Walcott being good
comment by Sir Digby (U6039)
posted 14 minutes ago
Guessing by this article the op is taking back all his comments on Walcott being good
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He is good, Digby but wasnt right for yesterday's game. We need Theo back and he needs games now.
Yesterday it was all about Oli. Hope on another day it's all about Theo.
Pudit, velenis non repernat molupta sunt.
Solor se vent landitate poreperest re et fugiatem repta destrun destius antur, cor millaut harchiciisse dissinv elestet alis andios eum aut doluptatiis moluptam nonsercia nem qui bea as volum ut qui dunt ma int aliquat emquam ad ut exerorpor solupta turesomnis excepella sus dolende bitiat pa qui sa quatum ius.
Est repudit esto temoditas idelit latendamet que adipsam, con rempel es saecate mposamet aliquae. Rem. Emquo quiassequi blanti doluptas re, cusantem nis maximus dolendi odis in re velit, eos derspel itatis et aut vollibus res nisci inci restio eum explit evelloremo eium corum eos endici odiciat emolore henisqui occuptatem nimolupient aut qui occupta tincti aliquo doluptat apis ex es moles eaquassequia inctur?
And he also has a job on the side!
http://www.reveal.co.uk/lifestyle/news/a481210/rylan-clark-announced-as-new-big-brothers-bit-on-the-side-host.html
And he also has a job on th side!
comment by Gunnerthru (U6675)
posted 1 hour, 40 minutes ago
comment by Sir Digby (U6039)
posted 14 minutes ago
Guessing by this article the op is taking back all his comments on Walcott being good
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He is good, Digby but wasnt right for yesterday's game. We need Theo back and he needs games now.
Yesterday it was all about Oli. Hope on another day it's all about Theo.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
if hes ever going to succeed it will be on the wing, he offers no defensive help at all
comment by WengersBodyguard2 (U8276)
posted 5 hours, 47 minutes ago
Bats
Last night he done mostly what he always does. The difference was the team played with him brilliantly. Last night we actually tailored our game to Giroud instead of playing and totally forgetting he's not Theo. The team set 'em up and he knocked 'em down.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We have done this loads of times and in the big games it doesn't work because good teams can actually defend against those tactics. The only big game that ever came close to paying dividends was vs Spurs and he missed 3 sitters.
comment by Bats (U18355)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by WengersBodyguard2 (U8276)
posted 5 hours, 47 minutes ago
Bats
Last night he done mostly what he always does. The difference was the team played with him brilliantly. Last night we actually tailored our game to Giroud instead of playing and totally forgetting he's not Theo. The team set 'em up and he knocked 'em down.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We have done this loads of times and in the big games it doesn't work because good teams can actually defend against those tactics. The only big game that ever came close to paying dividends was vs Spurs and he missed 3 sitters.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not denying there have been game in the past where he missed a chance here and there. Question sometimes is what is a chance you have to score or is it a chance you could have scored. And add to this that all players sometimes miss chances.
It's obviously a good Habit on our board that if we dont win or having the result that was expected he is always the reason we failed. I am fed of this shiiiit. He has his limitations and he is not world class like Aguero but he is by no means the donkey for everyone whenever we fail. Wish you and some others here analyse games more objective and leave out the bias.
GT - You are the one showing bias, not me. I never held him responsible for any dropped points. The only game I would place most of the blame on us not winning was vs Zagreb. Other poor results have been down to the team and manager as a hole not performing, and vs Chelsea it was down to the ref.
I have warmed to Giroud over the last year, think he is a good asset for the squad to have. He clearly is not top quality though and it's obvious why he gets criticism.
Bats
We hardly played like that last season. Even at our best last season, our passing and ball retention was shocking by Arsenal standards (quite possibly the worst season ever for possession and misplaced passes). It's only this season that we have began to again look like Wenger's Arsenal. The passing just wasn't there last season.
On Wed night, once they settled, we saw what we've become used to in terms of our passing game. Giroud is heavily reliant on our passing game working well. If the team is unsettled and misplacing everything, so does he. With us getting our act sorted passing-wise and Campbell in the side regularly, I'm betting Giroud is going to leave egg on quite a few faces on this board this season. He'll get 30 or dam close. Regardless of whether it's Theo that starts more or him.
comment by Bats (U18355)
posted 15 hours, 34 minutes ago
GT - You are the one showing bias, not me. I never held him responsible for any dropped points. The only game I would place most of the blame on us not winning was vs Zagreb. Other poor results have been down to the team and manager as a hole not performing, and vs Chelsea it was down to the ref.
I have warmed to Giroud over the last year, think he is a good asset for the squad to have. He clearly is not top quality though and it's obvious why he gets criticism.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
WB2: On Giroud we completely agree. Spot on comment again.
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
Talk About "Begrudging"
Page 1 of 1
posted on 10/12/15
Credit to him for getting his first hatrick ever gor us. Stull think we should be looking for better though
posted on 10/12/15
Everybody has given him credit. He would get more credit if these performances were the norm, as opposed to his WBA and Norwich performances
posted on 10/12/15
comment by I am gooner now (U16927)
posted 10 minutes ago
Credit to him for getting his first hatrick ever gor us. Stull think we should be looking for better though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok but who is available to buy that's currently producing better than a goal a game?
posted on 10/12/15
Bats
Last night he done mostly what he always does. The difference was the team played with him brilliantly. Last night we actually tailored our game to Giroud instead of playing and totally forgetting he's not Theo. The team set 'em up and he knocked 'em down.
posted on 10/12/15
comment by WengersBodyguard2 (U8276)
posted 52 seconds ago
Bats
Last night he done mostly what he always does. The difference was the team played with him brilliantly. Last night we actually tailored our game to Giroud instead of playing and totally forgetting he's not Theo. The team set 'em up and he knocked 'em down.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly. Bats doesnt understand that and probably will never.
Olivier Giroud put us through the next CL round. He cost us 12 M and won us yesterday 20M. Haters going to hate. I don't care. Happy for him and firstly Arsenal
posted on 10/12/15
Giroud The God
posted on 10/12/15
Guessing by this article the op is taking back all his comments on Walcott being good
posted on 10/12/15
comment by Sir Digby (U6039)
posted 14 minutes ago
Guessing by this article the op is taking back all his comments on Walcott being good
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He is good, Digby but wasnt right for yesterday's game. We need Theo back and he needs games now.
Yesterday it was all about Oli. Hope on another day it's all about Theo.
posted on 10/12/15
Pudit, velenis non repernat molupta sunt.
Solor se vent landitate poreperest re et fugiatem repta destrun destius antur, cor millaut harchiciisse dissinv elestet alis andios eum aut doluptatiis moluptam nonsercia nem qui bea as volum ut qui dunt ma int aliquat emquam ad ut exerorpor solupta turesomnis excepella sus dolende bitiat pa qui sa quatum ius.
Est repudit esto temoditas idelit latendamet que adipsam, con rempel es saecate mposamet aliquae. Rem. Emquo quiassequi blanti doluptas re, cusantem nis maximus dolendi odis in re velit, eos derspel itatis et aut vollibus res nisci inci restio eum explit evelloremo eium corum eos endici odiciat emolore henisqui occuptatem nimolupient aut qui occupta tincti aliquo doluptat apis ex es moles eaquassequia inctur?
And he also has a job on the side!
posted on 10/12/15
http://www.reveal.co.uk/lifestyle/news/a481210/rylan-clark-announced-as-new-big-brothers-bit-on-the-side-host.html
And he also has a job on th side!
posted on 10/12/15
comment by Gunnerthru (U6675)
posted 1 hour, 40 minutes ago
comment by Sir Digby (U6039)
posted 14 minutes ago
Guessing by this article the op is taking back all his comments on Walcott being good
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He is good, Digby but wasnt right for yesterday's game. We need Theo back and he needs games now.
Yesterday it was all about Oli. Hope on another day it's all about Theo.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
if hes ever going to succeed it will be on the wing, he offers no defensive help at all
posted on 10/12/15
comment by WengersBodyguard2 (U8276)
posted 5 hours, 47 minutes ago
Bats
Last night he done mostly what he always does. The difference was the team played with him brilliantly. Last night we actually tailored our game to Giroud instead of playing and totally forgetting he's not Theo. The team set 'em up and he knocked 'em down.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We have done this loads of times and in the big games it doesn't work because good teams can actually defend against those tactics. The only big game that ever came close to paying dividends was vs Spurs and he missed 3 sitters.
posted on 10/12/15
comment by Bats (U18355)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by WengersBodyguard2 (U8276)
posted 5 hours, 47 minutes ago
Bats
Last night he done mostly what he always does. The difference was the team played with him brilliantly. Last night we actually tailored our game to Giroud instead of playing and totally forgetting he's not Theo. The team set 'em up and he knocked 'em down.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We have done this loads of times and in the big games it doesn't work because good teams can actually defend against those tactics. The only big game that ever came close to paying dividends was vs Spurs and he missed 3 sitters.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not denying there have been game in the past where he missed a chance here and there. Question sometimes is what is a chance you have to score or is it a chance you could have scored. And add to this that all players sometimes miss chances.
It's obviously a good Habit on our board that if we dont win or having the result that was expected he is always the reason we failed. I am fed of this shiiiit. He has his limitations and he is not world class like Aguero but he is by no means the donkey for everyone whenever we fail. Wish you and some others here analyse games more objective and leave out the bias.
posted on 10/12/15
GT - You are the one showing bias, not me. I never held him responsible for any dropped points. The only game I would place most of the blame on us not winning was vs Zagreb. Other poor results have been down to the team and manager as a hole not performing, and vs Chelsea it was down to the ref.
I have warmed to Giroud over the last year, think he is a good asset for the squad to have. He clearly is not top quality though and it's obvious why he gets criticism.
posted on 11/12/15
Bats
We hardly played like that last season. Even at our best last season, our passing and ball retention was shocking by Arsenal standards (quite possibly the worst season ever for possession and misplaced passes). It's only this season that we have began to again look like Wenger's Arsenal. The passing just wasn't there last season.
On Wed night, once they settled, we saw what we've become used to in terms of our passing game. Giroud is heavily reliant on our passing game working well. If the team is unsettled and misplacing everything, so does he. With us getting our act sorted passing-wise and Campbell in the side regularly, I'm betting Giroud is going to leave egg on quite a few faces on this board this season. He'll get 30 or dam close. Regardless of whether it's Theo that starts more or him.
posted on 11/12/15
comment by Bats (U18355)
posted 15 hours, 34 minutes ago
GT - You are the one showing bias, not me. I never held him responsible for any dropped points. The only game I would place most of the blame on us not winning was vs Zagreb. Other poor results have been down to the team and manager as a hole not performing, and vs Chelsea it was down to the ref.
I have warmed to Giroud over the last year, think he is a good asset for the squad to have. He clearly is not top quality though and it's obvious why he gets criticism.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
WB2: On Giroud we completely agree. Spot on comment again.
Page 1 of 1