I don't get it TWCWPS. What would you have preferred? Wait until Jan/next summer and sack half the first team letting King Jose have another 200-300m to blow on the next batch of players for him to p.ss off?
Genuine question - what is your alternative.
comment by HenrysCat (U3608)
posted 45 seconds ago
I don't get it TWCWPS. What would you have preferred? Wait until Jan/next summer and sack half the first team letting King Jose have another 200-300m to blow on the next batch of players for him to p.ss off?
Genuine question - what is your alternative.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Quite simple really.
1. He won't have taken us down. That much would have been certain.
2. If the players won't play for him, start rebuild in Jan and Summer.
3. Look to the long term and commit to this through thick and thin.
The real problem with Chelsea is the owner has really no idea what he wants to do with the club.
He says he wants a team and manager to play good football, build for the future while picking up silver.
He picks Mourinho when even 90% of Chelsea fan in their heart of hearts knew this was going to happen. It was obvious.
Chelsea's problem is you don't pick managers who aspire to or can assist you on the journey. You sign big names, your essentially the same as Real.
Swansea and Southampton are a great example of hiring right. They find someone who fits the vision they have for the club.
Man U, Arsenal and City have people who know exactly who they are you don't.
comment by Trojan21 (U13278)
posted 1 second ago
The real problem with Chelsea is the owner has really no idea what he wants to do with the club.
He says he wants a team and manager to play good football, build for the future while picking up silver.
He picks Mourinho when even 90% of Chelsea fan in their heart of hearts knew this was going to happen. It was obvious.
Chelsea's problem is you don't pick managers who aspire to or can assist you on the journey. You sign big names, your essentially the same as Real.
Swansea and Southampton are a great example of hiring right. They find someone who fits the vision they have for the club.
Man U, Arsenal and City have people who know exactly who they are you don't.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep.
So, exactly what I said then.
Sack half the team, spend another few hundred million and hope they don't fall out with Mourinho. Brilliant plan.
As you said, quite simple really.
comment by HenrysCat (U3608)
posted 23 seconds ago
So, exactly what I said then.
Sack half the team, spend another few hundred million and hope they don't fall out with Mourinho. Brilliant plan.
As you said, quite simple really.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's not what i said
IT is:
1. He won't have taken us down. That much would have been certain. - Irrelevant to the question, not sure why you mentioned it.
2. If the players won't play for him, start rebuild in Jan and Summer. - If things haven't been patched up with the players he's fallen out with by now, why should it suddenly change?
3. Look to the long term and commit to this through thick and thin - meaningless waffle, nothing to do with the question.
It beggars belief that a man who has saved the club from administration and bank rolled successive managers to unprecedented success at Chelsea Football Club seems to be under criticism for dismissing the incredible sulk
Only one person is to blame for Jose losing his job and that is Jose...again! The idea that RA should be facing criticism is clearly from plastic fans who jumped ship from United / Liverpool / Arsenal a few years back
RA backs his managers to the hilt. He isn't unrealistic in expecting a return on his investment. With a long term contract Jose should of been restructuring the club for 'long term' sustained success instead of throwing a tantrum when his public pursuit of the likes of John Stones didn't work!
He's tried to literally portrait himself as hard done by....he's got 'poor me' syndrome
comment by HenrysCat (U3608)
posted 2 minutes ago
IT is:
1. He won't have taken us down. That much would have been certain. - Irrelevant to the question, not sure why you mentioned it.
2. If the players won't play for him, start rebuild in Jan and Summer. - If things haven't been patched up with the players he's fallen out with by now, why should it suddenly change?
3. Look to the long term and commit to this through thick and thin - meaningless waffle, nothing to do with the question.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Move along. I'm not interested in you're argumentative comments. It's not my problem you can't grasp simple answers to even simpler questions.
comment by Respectedabsolutetruth11 (U9573)
posted 3 minutes ago
It beggars belief that a man who has saved the club from administration and bank rolled successive managers to unprecedented success at Chelsea Football Club seems to be under criticism for dismissing the incredible sulk
Only one person is to blame for Jose losing his job and that is Jose...again! The idea that RA should be facing criticism is clearly from plastic fans who jumped ship from United / Liverpool / Arsenal a few years back
RA backs his managers to the hilt. He isn't unrealistic in expecting a return on his investment. With a long term contract Jose should of been restructuring the club for 'long term' sustained success instead of throwing a tantrum when his public pursuit of the likes of John Stones didn't work!
He's tried to literally portrait himself as hard done by....he's got 'poor me' syndrome
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We won the league under José 7 months ago
Comment deleted by Article Creator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Guess Who's Back -NPE (U20804)
posted 6 seconds ago
Football now isn't the same game I grew up playing and watching
-
Oh boo-hoo.
You know why it isn't, because Abramovich and to a lesser extent, Ken Bates, shot us into the football stratosphere...
If anyone deserves time, it is Roman.
Jose dug his own grave, ruined the season through his own errors, and let's get out the world's smallest violin for his 10million pay-off.
We owed him nothing.
Jose never gave us "identity" and it is time we mvoed away from acting like some Meso-American trippy little cult that worships individuals.
Only our worship of racist Terry bothers me more than pitiful, billious garbage written about an overrated bloated manager.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's all unbecoming of a man in such a privileged position. His lack of humility and basic standards of behaviour towards others is appalling. He deserves whatever criticism he gets
He's not a 'character', he's not good for the game, he's a 'legend' in his own mind with fundamental flaws to be a long term success at any club. There are plenty of managers who win multiple trophies at big clubs. Even RDM won the CL at Chelsea, Jose couldn't! It's everything else that builds a club. Jose doesn't really care about Chelsea, he cares about himself!
---------------------------------------------------------
This. Respect.
Thanks for all you did Jose, but I can no longer stomach you being the image of my club. Bravely done Roman - and it was the right thing
comment by TheWhiteChameleonWallProjectSock (U17633)
José deserved the season regardless. That's a given.
..................
The club has shown little class and honour and for that I'm ashamed.We owe him.
..................
That just about sums it up for me
comment by CapeApe (U19277)
posted 2 hours, 7 minutes ago
comment by Manfrombelmonty (U1705)
posted 23 minutes ago
Today I still love the club as much as ever but have fallen out of love with the game at our current level where loyalty and honour has given way to money and success at all costs.
--------------
You were the pioneers of this. You reap what you sow.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Spot on
--------------------------------------------------------------------
call me crazy but "pioneers" really?
Sign in if you want to comment
My Take On Things....
Page 2 of 2
posted on 17/12/15
I don't get it TWCWPS. What would you have preferred? Wait until Jan/next summer and sack half the first team letting King Jose have another 200-300m to blow on the next batch of players for him to p.ss off?
Genuine question - what is your alternative.
posted on 17/12/15
comment by HenrysCat (U3608)
posted 45 seconds ago
I don't get it TWCWPS. What would you have preferred? Wait until Jan/next summer and sack half the first team letting King Jose have another 200-300m to blow on the next batch of players for him to p.ss off?
Genuine question - what is your alternative.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Quite simple really.
1. He won't have taken us down. That much would have been certain.
2. If the players won't play for him, start rebuild in Jan and Summer.
3. Look to the long term and commit to this through thick and thin.
posted on 17/12/15
The real problem with Chelsea is the owner has really no idea what he wants to do with the club.
He says he wants a team and manager to play good football, build for the future while picking up silver.
He picks Mourinho when even 90% of Chelsea fan in their heart of hearts knew this was going to happen. It was obvious.
Chelsea's problem is you don't pick managers who aspire to or can assist you on the journey. You sign big names, your essentially the same as Real.
Swansea and Southampton are a great example of hiring right. They find someone who fits the vision they have for the club.
Man U, Arsenal and City have people who know exactly who they are you don't.
posted on 17/12/15
comment by Trojan21 (U13278)
posted 1 second ago
The real problem with Chelsea is the owner has really no idea what he wants to do with the club.
He says he wants a team and manager to play good football, build for the future while picking up silver.
He picks Mourinho when even 90% of Chelsea fan in their heart of hearts knew this was going to happen. It was obvious.
Chelsea's problem is you don't pick managers who aspire to or can assist you on the journey. You sign big names, your essentially the same as Real.
Swansea and Southampton are a great example of hiring right. They find someone who fits the vision they have for the club.
Man U, Arsenal and City have people who know exactly who they are you don't.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep.
posted on 17/12/15
So, exactly what I said then.
Sack half the team, spend another few hundred million and hope they don't fall out with Mourinho. Brilliant plan.
As you said, quite simple really.
posted on 17/12/15
comment by HenrysCat (U3608)
posted 23 seconds ago
So, exactly what I said then.
Sack half the team, spend another few hundred million and hope they don't fall out with Mourinho. Brilliant plan.
As you said, quite simple really.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's not what i said
posted on 17/12/15
IT is:
1. He won't have taken us down. That much would have been certain. - Irrelevant to the question, not sure why you mentioned it.
2. If the players won't play for him, start rebuild in Jan and Summer. - If things haven't been patched up with the players he's fallen out with by now, why should it suddenly change?
3. Look to the long term and commit to this through thick and thin - meaningless waffle, nothing to do with the question.
posted on 17/12/15
It beggars belief that a man who has saved the club from administration and bank rolled successive managers to unprecedented success at Chelsea Football Club seems to be under criticism for dismissing the incredible sulk
Only one person is to blame for Jose losing his job and that is Jose...again! The idea that RA should be facing criticism is clearly from plastic fans who jumped ship from United / Liverpool / Arsenal a few years back
RA backs his managers to the hilt. He isn't unrealistic in expecting a return on his investment. With a long term contract Jose should of been restructuring the club for 'long term' sustained success instead of throwing a tantrum when his public pursuit of the likes of John Stones didn't work!
He's tried to literally portrait himself as hard done by....he's got 'poor me' syndrome
posted on 17/12/15
comment by HenrysCat (U3608)
posted 2 minutes ago
IT is:
1. He won't have taken us down. That much would have been certain. - Irrelevant to the question, not sure why you mentioned it.
2. If the players won't play for him, start rebuild in Jan and Summer. - If things haven't been patched up with the players he's fallen out with by now, why should it suddenly change?
3. Look to the long term and commit to this through thick and thin - meaningless waffle, nothing to do with the question.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Move along. I'm not interested in you're argumentative comments. It's not my problem you can't grasp simple answers to even simpler questions.
posted on 17/12/15
comment by Respectedabsolutetruth11 (U9573)
posted 3 minutes ago
It beggars belief that a man who has saved the club from administration and bank rolled successive managers to unprecedented success at Chelsea Football Club seems to be under criticism for dismissing the incredible sulk
Only one person is to blame for Jose losing his job and that is Jose...again! The idea that RA should be facing criticism is clearly from plastic fans who jumped ship from United / Liverpool / Arsenal a few years back
RA backs his managers to the hilt. He isn't unrealistic in expecting a return on his investment. With a long term contract Jose should of been restructuring the club for 'long term' sustained success instead of throwing a tantrum when his public pursuit of the likes of John Stones didn't work!
He's tried to literally portrait himself as hard done by....he's got 'poor me' syndrome
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We won the league under José 7 months ago
posted on 17/12/15
Comment deleted by Article Creator
posted on 17/12/15
Sshhh
posted on 17/12/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 17/12/15
comment by Guess Who's Back -NPE (U20804)
posted 6 seconds ago
Football now isn't the same game I grew up playing and watching
-
Oh boo-hoo.
You know why it isn't, because Abramovich and to a lesser extent, Ken Bates, shot us into the football stratosphere...
If anyone deserves time, it is Roman.
Jose dug his own grave, ruined the season through his own errors, and let's get out the world's smallest violin for his 10million pay-off.
We owed him nothing.
Jose never gave us "identity" and it is time we mvoed away from acting like some Meso-American trippy little cult that worships individuals.
Only our worship of racist Terry bothers me more than pitiful, billious garbage written about an overrated bloated manager.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 17/12/15
It's all unbecoming of a man in such a privileged position. His lack of humility and basic standards of behaviour towards others is appalling. He deserves whatever criticism he gets
He's not a 'character', he's not good for the game, he's a 'legend' in his own mind with fundamental flaws to be a long term success at any club. There are plenty of managers who win multiple trophies at big clubs. Even RDM won the CL at Chelsea, Jose couldn't! It's everything else that builds a club. Jose doesn't really care about Chelsea, he cares about himself!
---------------------------------------------------------
This. Respect.
Thanks for all you did Jose, but I can no longer stomach you being the image of my club. Bravely done Roman - and it was the right thing
posted on 17/12/15
comment by TheWhiteChameleonWallProjectSock (U17633)
José deserved the season regardless. That's a given.
..................
The club has shown little class and honour and for that I'm ashamed.We owe him.
..................
That just about sums it up for me
posted on 17/12/15
comment by CapeApe (U19277)
posted 2 hours, 7 minutes ago
comment by Manfrombelmonty (U1705)
posted 23 minutes ago
Today I still love the club as much as ever but have fallen out of love with the game at our current level where loyalty and honour has given way to money and success at all costs.
--------------
You were the pioneers of this. You reap what you sow.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Spot on
--------------------------------------------------------------------
call me crazy but "pioneers" really?
Page 2 of 2