and that's why its pointless debating with you
================
You find it pointless debating with me, yet you needlessly go out of your way to follow me onto this article (where you have not even been involved in the topic being posted about) just to tell me i'm stubborn, i dont listen, and i'm on the wrong end of the debate - even though you have no idea what the debate is about and / or who is saying what..
Me and Analog might not be agreeing on much lately but he is perfectly capable of fighting his own battles and does not need you butting in with your alien shaped head...
follow you on? pretty sure I commented on this article well before you showed up
Chronic is spot on here tbf
Chronic is spot on here tbf
=============
Ah bless . And there was me claiming you didnt need Chronic to fight your battles.
Yes Chronic,
No Chronic,
Please be my JA friend Chronic....
Chronic (aka alien head),
follow you on? pretty sure I commented on this article well before you showed up
=================
Do you know what the funny thing is in all this, is that my comments are simply backing up what your last post was about (which i quote):
"Mason could easily find a prem club if sold by spurs, and I hope we don't sell him".
Which proves my point exactly that (& i quote):
"you have no idea what the debate is about and / or who is saying what".
You faaaccccking clown...
Basically you claim I’m “on the wrong end of the debate”, yet it’s the same side of the debate as you gave. You really are a plonker aren’t you?
Wow this turned stupid quick
ツ Hєиgу,
It was a bit heated between me and Analog - but it was fine. Some strong views being exchanged but views on football nonetheless.
Then Chronic does what Chronic does, he turns up and decides to take the topic off of football - and wants a cyber row instead .
The whole thing seems to have started when Chicken weighed in with "if he was from abroad nobody would question his quality" line, which is of course nonsense and is insulting to other forum members.
Chicken loves nothing more than a tiiit for tat with fellow Spurs fans
"if he was from abroad nobody would question his quality" line, which is of course nonsense and is insulting to other forum members.
======================
How is that insulting other forum members? .
If you are offended by this comment then i think you need to man-up a little bit. How pathetic
Luka,
You're forever going on that i favour English players yet because i said that quote about a player abroad you are saying it has hurt your little feelings. Poor little Luka, diddums.
Admins, can i just check i have logged onto the adult version of JA?
Yea, i am really going to take a while to recover from this one
Just giving you tips, be a bit more diplomatic instead of accusing everyone of favouring foreigners based solely on the fact they are foreign, and you just may not have an argument each time you, though i suspect that's exactly what you're looking for so fill yer boots pal
chicken you made a good comment yesterday and today you have spoiled it by resorting to "type"
cmon mate, where is the old chicken of a few years ago who was a good, reasoned poster who could sensibly debate?
Chronic,
chicken you made a good comment yesterday and today you have spoiled it by resorting to "type"
====================
What you mean is "you agreed with my comment yesterday".
You have always been the same, if someone agrees with you - then they are a good poster. If they disagree, then you try to start playground cyber wars with them.
Luka,
Just giving you tips, be a bit more diplomatic instead of accusing everyone of favouring foreigners based solely on the fact they are foreign
==============
Yet its perfectly fine for you to accuse me of favouritism towards English players.
Cor dear, you dont want it all your own way do you?....MUCH .
comment by Chicken_ (U1043)
posted 1 minute ago
Chronic,
chicken you made a good comment yesterday and today you have spoiled it by resorting to "type"
====================
What you mean is "you agreed with my comment yesterday".
You have always been the same, if someone agrees with you - then they are a good poster. If they disagree, then you try to start playground cyber wars with them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
incorrect, I am happy for people to oppose my views If they have a good well backed up argument. I can then see that even though I disagree, that I could see why someone would suggest it.
for example I disagree with Don over berahino being anything special, however I can see where he is coming from.
on the other hand your arguments are poorly thought out, and you manipulate what the other person says and pass it off as if they make a silly point. plus you are too stubborn to see reason when you are wrong.
Chronic,
My whole point was that Mason is not a Championship player. Your original post from way back said exactly the same thing.
But, you came on here, saw that i was having a heated debate, decided to automatically side with the other poster, and claim i was on the wrong side of the debate (i.e. my opinion was wrong).
But the stupid thing is (well, this is why you are the dumbest twaaaaaaaat to have ever joined a forum) is because we actually had the same view on the same topic - but you didnt even read any posts to find that out.
Its no wonder posters from here and other team boards think you are the forum clown.
Sign in if you want to comment
Teams for Leicester
Page 5 of 5
posted on 12/1/16
and that's why its pointless debating with you
================
You find it pointless debating with me, yet you needlessly go out of your way to follow me onto this article (where you have not even been involved in the topic being posted about) just to tell me i'm stubborn, i dont listen, and i'm on the wrong end of the debate - even though you have no idea what the debate is about and / or who is saying what..
Me and Analog might not be agreeing on much lately but he is perfectly capable of fighting his own battles and does not need you butting in with your alien shaped head...
posted on 12/1/16
follow you on? pretty sure I commented on this article well before you showed up
posted on 12/1/16
Chronic is spot on here tbf
posted on 12/1/16
Chronic is spot on here tbf
=============
Ah bless . And there was me claiming you didnt need Chronic to fight your battles.
Yes Chronic,
No Chronic,
Please be my JA friend Chronic....
posted on 12/1/16
You're so strange
posted on 12/1/16
Chronic (aka alien head),
follow you on? pretty sure I commented on this article well before you showed up
=================
Do you know what the funny thing is in all this, is that my comments are simply backing up what your last post was about (which i quote):
"Mason could easily find a prem club if sold by spurs, and I hope we don't sell him".
Which proves my point exactly that (& i quote):
"you have no idea what the debate is about and / or who is saying what".
You faaaccccking clown...
posted on 12/1/16
Basically you claim I’m “on the wrong end of the debate”, yet it’s the same side of the debate as you gave. You really are a plonker aren’t you?
posted on 12/1/16
Wow this turned stupid quick
posted on 12/1/16
ツ Hєиgу,
It was a bit heated between me and Analog - but it was fine. Some strong views being exchanged but views on football nonetheless.
Then Chronic does what Chronic does, he turns up and decides to take the topic off of football - and wants a cyber row instead .
posted on 12/1/16
The whole thing seems to have started when Chicken weighed in with "if he was from abroad nobody would question his quality" line, which is of course nonsense and is insulting to other forum members.
Chicken loves nothing more than a tiiit for tat with fellow Spurs fans
posted on 12/1/16
"if he was from abroad nobody would question his quality" line, which is of course nonsense and is insulting to other forum members.
======================
How is that insulting other forum members? .
If you are offended by this comment then i think you need to man-up a little bit. How pathetic
posted on 12/1/16
Luka,
You're forever going on that i favour English players yet because i said that quote about a player abroad you are saying it has hurt your little feelings. Poor little Luka, diddums.
Admins, can i just check i have logged onto the adult version of JA?
posted on 12/1/16
Yea, i am really going to take a while to recover from this one
Just giving you tips, be a bit more diplomatic instead of accusing everyone of favouring foreigners based solely on the fact they are foreign, and you just may not have an argument each time you, though i suspect that's exactly what you're looking for so fill yer boots pal
posted on 12/1/16
each time you post*
posted on 12/1/16
chicken you made a good comment yesterday and today you have spoiled it by resorting to "type"
cmon mate, where is the old chicken of a few years ago who was a good, reasoned poster who could sensibly debate?
posted on 12/1/16
Chronic,
chicken you made a good comment yesterday and today you have spoiled it by resorting to "type"
====================
What you mean is "you agreed with my comment yesterday".
You have always been the same, if someone agrees with you - then they are a good poster. If they disagree, then you try to start playground cyber wars with them.
posted on 12/1/16
Luka,
Just giving you tips, be a bit more diplomatic instead of accusing everyone of favouring foreigners based solely on the fact they are foreign
==============
Yet its perfectly fine for you to accuse me of favouritism towards English players.
Cor dear, you dont want it all your own way do you?....MUCH .
posted on 12/1/16
comment by Chicken_ (U1043)
posted 1 minute ago
Chronic,
chicken you made a good comment yesterday and today you have spoiled it by resorting to "type"
====================
What you mean is "you agreed with my comment yesterday".
You have always been the same, if someone agrees with you - then they are a good poster. If they disagree, then you try to start playground cyber wars with them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
incorrect, I am happy for people to oppose my views If they have a good well backed up argument. I can then see that even though I disagree, that I could see why someone would suggest it.
for example I disagree with Don over berahino being anything special, however I can see where he is coming from.
on the other hand your arguments are poorly thought out, and you manipulate what the other person says and pass it off as if they make a silly point. plus you are too stubborn to see reason when you are wrong.
posted on 13/1/16
Chronic,
My whole point was that Mason is not a Championship player. Your original post from way back said exactly the same thing.
But, you came on here, saw that i was having a heated debate, decided to automatically side with the other poster, and claim i was on the wrong side of the debate (i.e. my opinion was wrong).
But the stupid thing is (well, this is why you are the dumbest twaaaaaaaat to have ever joined a forum) is because we actually had the same view on the same topic - but you didnt even read any posts to find that out.
Its no wonder posters from here and other team boards think you are the forum clown.
Page 5 of 5