Yeah but still its the 7 year period! We gotta hope the board can find the legal loop hole they are looking for to get this contract tore up before then, just reading the clauses we are allowed to know about makes me panic about what we cant know!
I don't believe it's coincidence that this has happened this week ,master the SD capitulation .and immediately after SD have had to close two of its largest stores , Glasgow and Belfast due to low sales.
coop
We served this notice when we repaid the loan, that triggered the 7 year notice period.
The chairman has decided to issue a statement the day after SD backed down in court over the stupid case they brought against him with regards the confidentiality agreement......I'm not in the least bit surprised by that either, if I had a wee personal victory liek that I'd be inclined to crow about it too
The BBC are reporting like its news !
It's the BBC, you gotta give them slack, they probably worked hard to try and find a way to make it seem like Rangers were in the wrong somehow before they went with the story.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Was thinking exactly that Smid
Great to hear, even if it means court battles, stick it right up em
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Curly, going by what Dave King said in his statement it looks like they could be separate things, with the notice being given looking like a voluntary action, rather than notice being triggered when the loan was paid. I could be wrong though!
"An unanticipated investment was made to pay off the Sports Direct loan and to recover all security held by Sports Direct. That has now been completed and the club has formally given notice to end the relationship with Sports Direct while still reserving our right to proceed with challenges to the existing suite of contracts and side agreements in a court of law.”
Curly
I think you are right mate, and apologies coop.
One didn't automatically trigger the other, but I'm 100% certain one could not have happened without the other.
My understanding of it is that under the duration of the loan Ashley had 75% control of Rangers Retail, and as the retail deal is with Sport Direct and Rangers Retail and not the club, notice to end the deal was never going to be ratified by a company that Ashley had a 75% stake of.
After the loan was repaid, the club got 51% ownership of Rangers Retail again, giving the club the majority, and the means to serve the notice.
From where I was coming from, I was basically of the mind that as soon as the loan was paid off, notice would be given, as there would be no reason for delay
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
Red card for fat boy
Page 1 of 1
posted on 4/2/16
Yeah but still its the 7 year period! We gotta hope the board can find the legal loop hole they are looking for to get this contract tore up before then, just reading the clauses we are allowed to know about makes me panic about what we cant know!
posted on 4/2/16
I don't believe it's coincidence that this has happened this week ,master the SD capitulation .and immediately after SD have had to close two of its largest stores , Glasgow and Belfast due to low sales.
posted on 4/2/16
*after the capitulation
posted on 4/2/16
coop
We served this notice when we repaid the loan, that triggered the 7 year notice period.
The chairman has decided to issue a statement the day after SD backed down in court over the stupid case they brought against him with regards the confidentiality agreement......I'm not in the least bit surprised by that either, if I had a wee personal victory liek that I'd be inclined to crow about it too
posted on 4/2/16
The BBC are reporting like its news !
posted on 4/2/16
It's the BBC, you gotta give them slack, they probably worked hard to try and find a way to make it seem like Rangers were in the wrong somehow before they went with the story.
posted on 4/2/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 4/2/16
Was thinking exactly that Smid
Great to hear, even if it means court battles, stick it right up em
posted on 4/2/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 4/2/16
Curly, going by what Dave King said in his statement it looks like they could be separate things, with the notice being given looking like a voluntary action, rather than notice being triggered when the loan was paid. I could be wrong though!
"An unanticipated investment was made to pay off the Sports Direct loan and to recover all security held by Sports Direct. That has now been completed and the club has formally given notice to end the relationship with Sports Direct while still reserving our right to proceed with challenges to the existing suite of contracts and side agreements in a court of law.”
posted on 6/2/16
Curly
I think you are right mate, and apologies coop.
One didn't automatically trigger the other, but I'm 100% certain one could not have happened without the other.
My understanding of it is that under the duration of the loan Ashley had 75% control of Rangers Retail, and as the retail deal is with Sport Direct and Rangers Retail and not the club, notice to end the deal was never going to be ratified by a company that Ashley had a 75% stake of.
After the loan was repaid, the club got 51% ownership of Rangers Retail again, giving the club the majority, and the means to serve the notice.
From where I was coming from, I was basically of the mind that as soon as the loan was paid off, notice would be given, as there would be no reason for delay
posted on 6/2/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Page 1 of 1