or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 68 comments are related to an article called:

Thought I'd start contributing

Page 3 of 3

posted on 9/2/16

Pointless you replying thudd you fecking loser, because I have no intention in reading what you got to say. You just come up filtered god that must hurt you. I just get everyone else on here telling me how obsessed you are with me and how you feel the need to mention me every day on here. Get a life!!

posted on 9/2/16

Chicken landing a couple of jabs on Don's chin here, seems like Don has filtered the feathered one

Welcome to the forum KIA, great time to join pal

posted on 9/2/16

Thanks Don and Luka

I think most of us can be guilty of over stating a potential new signing's abilities. Just shows the enthusiasm I guess.

My approach nowadays is to play signings down. If they go badly you've saved face and if they go well then lucky us!

posted on 9/2/16

Luka, got no time for guys who's main intention is to come on and wind up their own supporters mate both WUMS

posted on 9/2/16

Luka, only time I will ever see a chicken post is when someone quotes him. Hence why on the match thread the other day I could see people quoting his pathetic moaning of Lamela at 0-0. Trust me you should try it, ja606 is such a great place without that mentally unstable arrogant to** pot chicken

posted on 9/2/16

Don, yea Chicken does have a tendency to get hung up on certain players / topics. Him moaning at Lamela whilst it was 0-0 was as predictable as saying tomorrow will be wednesday. Still, it's a forum and thus all about opinion, which is what makes it interesting to read, and i hope you unfilter him soon as it makes for fun reading when the pair of you lock horns

comment by Chronic (U3423)

posted on 9/2/16

chicken is an idiot. its best to remember this before engaging with him

posted on 9/2/16

Chronic, chicken is mafia boy with better spelling. Not much difference between the pair.

posted on 9/2/16

Don used to say I only come on here after a loss, then he changed it to when we lose or draw, now its extended to a loss, a draw, and “when someone quotes me”, whatever that means...

Don filtered me because I kept on showing all his contradictions and inconsistencies, which ironically he has just proven all over again on this very article….

posted on 9/2/16

LukaCorluka

Don, yea Chicken does have a tendency to get hung up on certain players / topics. Him moaning at Lamela whilst it was 0-0 was as predictable as saying tomorrow will be wednesday.

==================

I wasn't moaning, i was simply pointing out on the match thread that he was our weakest player - which he was - which was (as always) also the opinion of the independent journalist ratings in the morning papers.

What do you want me to do, lie; and say he is smashing it every game when he isn't? .

posted on 9/2/16

Kane is Able,

I think most of us can be guilty of over stating a potential new signing's abilities. Just shows the enthusiasm I guess.

My approach nowadays is to play signings down. If they go badly you've saved face and if they go well then lucky us!

============================

All fans are guilty of mocking players, the manager or the chairman – but for some reason Don, Luka, Chronic and 99% of the board are extra sensitive about Lamela. Maybe they are ashamed at the record transfer fee – maybe some are ashamed because they claimed they had watched him week in, week out, in Italy (i.e. Don ), only to be found out to be fibbing, maybe some are in denial, I don’t know the reasons – but I couldn’t care less if they are homegrown, cheap or come with a high price tag, I don’t have any more sentiment towards them and I just say what I see – and I just see an extremely poor player in Lamela.


posted on 9/2/16

comment by Thicken_ (U1043)
posted 2 hours, 3 minutes ago
LukaCorluka

Don, yea Chicken does have a tendency to get hung up on certain players / topics. Him moaning at Lamela whilst it was 0-0 was as predictable as saying tomorrow will be wednesday.

==================

I wasn't moaning, i was simply pointing out on the match thread that he was our weakest player - which he was - which was (as always) also the opinion of the independent journalist ratings in the morning papers.

What do you want me to do, lie; and say he is smashing it every game when he isn't?.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Chadli was our weakest player on this occassion, reflected by the fact he was subbed first

posted on 9/2/16

Welcome aboard







Feckin students!

posted on 9/2/16

Haha thanks mate !

posted on 10/2/16

Luka,

Chadli was our weakest player on this occassion, reflected by the fact he was subbed first

==================

Is that the blueprint of fact? I'll have to bear this in mind.

Bookmarked...

posted on 10/2/16

Well our excellent coaches opinion, for me, is more reliable than the rag reviews you read which apparently always have Lamela as our weakest player. You was even going to write an article aggregating all these poor reviews in order to establish a fact that Lamela is our weakest performer, right?

Out of interest i googled player ratings for this game and Daily Mail, Sky Sports and WhoScored (stats based rating) all have Lamela as the better performer than Chadli. So it must be fact according to your own logic?

The Lamela obsession has now reached epic proportions. You have now shown not only that you will single out Lamela regardless of how he plays, but also that you're happy to ignore your own sources when it suits, just in order to win an argument

KIA, welcome to ChickenWorld

posted on 10/2/16

Kane is able, just saw this article, welcome to the board fella

posted on 10/2/16

Thanks mate

Page 3 of 3

Sign in if you want to comment