You need take a serious chill pill. You seem obsessed with the world acknowledging Leicester whilst failing to accept that the world does not also revolve around Leicester. It's beyond tedious. Woy is always Woy, it doesn't matter if it's Vardy or anybody else.
Not really worth looking into anything in friendlies too much.
Encourage game, but happened enough in the past to know that it means literally nothing
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Agreed. Between Rooney's pie deal and Vardys Wkd deal Roy will want to give both game time and will be getting it in the neck from one set of sponsors
Because it was a friendly
Probably because he can't believe the pressure on him to include a guy who only has 46 professional goals in his career.
I bet Roy is delighted that the Spurs boys are now the glue holding the England side together though, even if none of them is good enough to get in the Leicester side
comment by merrysupersteve (U1132)
posted 29 minutes ago
You need take a serious chill pill. You seem obsessed with the world acknowledging Leicester whilst failing to accept that the world does not also revolve around Leicester. It's beyond tedious. Woy is always Woy, it doesn't matter if it's Vardy or anybody else.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think you need to take a chill pill and actually acknowledge the point I was making about Woy's lack of passion. Joachim Low was celebrating their goals and it was a friendly for both teams. I don't like his lack of passion!
He smiled at Kane's goal and was out of his seat for the winner but nothing for the equaliser. I never indicated that everything was about Leicester so stop chatting shiiit
comment by Cinciwolf----KoP champion, HC+DG champion, officially paid for being here-----$254 (U11551)
posted 8 minutes ago
Probably because he can't believe the pressure on him to include a guy who only has 46 professional goals in his career.
I bet Roy is delighted that the Spurs boys are now the glue holding the England side together though, even if none of them is good enough to get in the Leicester side
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kane wouldn't get in our team and neither would Dier.
No, of course they wouldn't.
Dier would not get in our team ahead of Kante and Drinky, not a chance!!
Kane would not suit our style of play and would not get in our team, not a chance, he's too slow and we need players who chase defenders and chase loose balls and he can't do that so no he wouldn't get into our team ahead of Vardy or Okazaki, not a chance!!
Where would Alli play? No place for him, we play 4-4-2 and his role for Spurs wouldn't fit our team.
Our centre halves wouldn't make way for Alderweireld or Vertonghen, we don't need them as Morgan and Huth have been outstanding.
Fuchs is better than Rose and Simpson is a better defender than Walker and Walker's role at Spurs is more of an attacking full back and that doesn't suit our style either.
Kasper wouldn't make way for Lloris either. One of Kasper's biggest assets to us is his distribution and the way he builds our counter attacks. Lloris' distribution isn't anyhere near as good as Kasper's.
Our defence, this current back four, have conceded less than Spurs and have kept more clean sheets so we don't need any of them.
Eriksen wouldnt get in ahead of Mahrez. Dembele wouldn't get in ahead of Kante or Drinky either. No Spurs player would get into our team. No chance!!
But yet Dier gets in ahead of Drinky for his country.
As for Kane, i think Ranieri is an excellent manager and i don't think for one second he would fail to find a place for Kane, without question the best England striker the last two seasons.
comment by Cinciwolf----KoP champion, HC+DG champion, officially paid for being here-----$254 (U11551)
posted 3 minutes ago
But yet Dier gets in ahead of Drinky for his country.
As for Kane, i think Ranieri is an excellent manager and i don't think for one second he would fail to find a place for Kane, without question the best England striker the last two seasons.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Drinky has just been called up to the England team and is a different player to Dier. Drinky is a box to box whereas Dier is defensive. Drinky's passing piiisses all over Dier's. He would not get in our team ahead of Kante.
Kane wouldn't be fitted into our team because he doesn't suit our style of play, simple as that. Kramaric didn't get a chance because he lacked the stamina to be able to play in our team, it wasn't his ability. Ranieri said he's a fantastic player, a great finisher, very skillful and has a great attitude but said "he needs time to rest and recover and we can't afford to have players who need to rest" and Kane couldn't do that.
You don't know what you're talking about. Kane would never get into our team.
Amazing how this legendary Leicester sid came about isn't it.
So so good from nowhere that nobody can even break into the side.
Remarkable.
comment by Cinciwolf----KoP champion, HC+DG champion, officially paid for being here-----$254 (U11551)
posted 8 minutes ago
Amazing how this legendary Leicester sid came about isn't it.
So so good from nowhere that nobody can even break into the side.
Remarkable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That makes absolutely no sense at all, what are you trying to say?
Basically that you talk the biggest load of crap i have ever heard on a forum.
Somehow you have convinced yourself that this Leicester side is some force of nature and no other team comes near it.
Even more remarkably you have somehow convinced yourself Leicester are considerably better than Spurs despite being outplayed by Spurs four times this season.
Literally a one goal swing would have Spurs sitting top of the table rather than you right now, and that goal you scored was a from a feckin corner, hardly some footballing master class.
In that same game you were battered and Spurs had numerous chances, on another day you would have been beaten.
It is such a shame that you cannot find it in yourself to be remotely honest about the situation at hand and dismiss a very good Spurs side as being anywhere near you in standard and trashing all of their players.
It is frankly ridiculous and makes you look a complete moron.
I don't class Spurs as outplaying us, we allowed them the ball and they did fook all with it. There's more than one way of playing football and the way we play as a team is more efficient than Spurs and our players fit it perfectly.
Last 40 games Spurs have won 72 points and have lost seven, we've won 88 points and lost four and the fact is they didn't beat us and we are top. They beat our rezzies and couldn't beat our first XI! Take your shiiitt argument somewhere else!
You know what, you offer nothing to our board other than slagg
^ slagging us off. You don't know anything about football and your days of commenting on my articles are over. I'm sick of your bullshiitt and your love for Spurs so go and share your adoration with them because I'm not interested in your ridiculous view!
I wish there were more slagg on the Arsenal board
Dammit Arro you finished your comment too soon
Yeah I couldn't have accidently pressed send at a better time ha ha 😂
comment by arrothefoxinoz (U8567)
posted 29 minutes ago
I don't class Spurs as outplaying us, we allowed them the ball and they did fook all with it. There's more than one way of playing football and the way we play as a team is more efficient than Spurs and our players fit it perfectly.
Last 40 games Spurs have won 72 points and have lost seven, we've won 88 points and lost four and the fact is they didn't beat us and we are top. They beat our rezzies and couldn't beat our first XI! Take your shiiitt argument somewhere else!
You know what, you offer nothing to our board other than slagg
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is a shame you have to keep repeating this point Arro, seems that they just won't let it drop.
comment by BraveheartTyke (U6173)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by arrothefoxinoz (U8567)
posted 29 minutes ago
I don't class Spurs as outplaying us, we allowed them the ball and they did fook all with it. There's more than one way of playing football and the way we play as a team is more efficient than Spurs and our players fit it perfectly.
Last 40 games Spurs have won 72 points and have lost seven, we've won 88 points and lost four and the fact is they didn't beat us and we are top. They beat our rezzies and couldn't beat our first XI! Take your shiiitt argument somewhere else!
You know what, you offer nothing to our board other than slagg
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is a shame you have to keep repeating this point Arro, seems that they just won't let it drop.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know mate but I won't be repeating it again because his time is done and he won't be commenting on any of my articles anymore.
Please could you clarify what you mean by your defence has conceded less than Spurs?
comment by Scribe is back (U18092)
posted 14 minutes ago
Please could you clarify what you mean by your defence has conceded less than Spurs?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Certainly.
In the first seven games we conceded 14 goals when playing essentially two wingers at full back. Schlupp is a winger who Pearson utilised as a left back but he certainly isn't and De Laet is on loan at Boro as a winger.
Ranieri changed full backs when he could, in other words after a defeat, since then we have conceded less goals and kept more clean sheets than Spurs.
So comparing our current back five of Schmeichel, Simpson, Morgan, Huth and Fuchs with Spurs' Lloris, Walker, Alderwiereld, Verts/Wimmer and Rose and we have the better defence.
Hope that's clarified it for you 👍
Bore of the same Arro
Those Spurs players would walk into any team in the Premiership. Kane and Vardy up front for LCFC you would not want that why? Let me guess blinded by your own prejudice. finally in the highlights Roy did celebrate and went for a littles dance.
None are so blind as those who don't want see.
Sign in if you want to comment
Why didn't Woy celebrate?
Page 1 of 4
posted on 28/3/16
You need take a serious chill pill. You seem obsessed with the world acknowledging Leicester whilst failing to accept that the world does not also revolve around Leicester. It's beyond tedious. Woy is always Woy, it doesn't matter if it's Vardy or anybody else.
posted on 28/3/16
Not really worth looking into anything in friendlies too much.
Encourage game, but happened enough in the past to know that it means literally nothing
posted on 28/3/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/3/16
Agreed. Between Rooney's pie deal and Vardys Wkd deal Roy will want to give both game time and will be getting it in the neck from one set of sponsors
posted on 28/3/16
Because it was a friendly
posted on 28/3/16
Probably because he can't believe the pressure on him to include a guy who only has 46 professional goals in his career.
I bet Roy is delighted that the Spurs boys are now the glue holding the England side together though, even if none of them is good enough to get in the Leicester side
posted on 28/3/16
comment by merrysupersteve (U1132)
posted 29 minutes ago
You need take a serious chill pill. You seem obsessed with the world acknowledging Leicester whilst failing to accept that the world does not also revolve around Leicester. It's beyond tedious. Woy is always Woy, it doesn't matter if it's Vardy or anybody else.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think you need to take a chill pill and actually acknowledge the point I was making about Woy's lack of passion. Joachim Low was celebrating their goals and it was a friendly for both teams. I don't like his lack of passion!
He smiled at Kane's goal and was out of his seat for the winner but nothing for the equaliser. I never indicated that everything was about Leicester so stop chatting shiiit
posted on 28/3/16
comment by Cinciwolf----KoP champion, HC+DG champion, officially paid for being here-----$254 (U11551)
posted 8 minutes ago
Probably because he can't believe the pressure on him to include a guy who only has 46 professional goals in his career.
I bet Roy is delighted that the Spurs boys are now the glue holding the England side together though, even if none of them is good enough to get in the Leicester side
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kane wouldn't get in our team and neither would Dier.
posted on 28/3/16
No, of course they wouldn't.
posted on 28/3/16
Dier would not get in our team ahead of Kante and Drinky, not a chance!!
Kane would not suit our style of play and would not get in our team, not a chance, he's too slow and we need players who chase defenders and chase loose balls and he can't do that so no he wouldn't get into our team ahead of Vardy or Okazaki, not a chance!!
Where would Alli play? No place for him, we play 4-4-2 and his role for Spurs wouldn't fit our team.
Our centre halves wouldn't make way for Alderweireld or Vertonghen, we don't need them as Morgan and Huth have been outstanding.
Fuchs is better than Rose and Simpson is a better defender than Walker and Walker's role at Spurs is more of an attacking full back and that doesn't suit our style either.
Kasper wouldn't make way for Lloris either. One of Kasper's biggest assets to us is his distribution and the way he builds our counter attacks. Lloris' distribution isn't anyhere near as good as Kasper's.
Our defence, this current back four, have conceded less than Spurs and have kept more clean sheets so we don't need any of them.
Eriksen wouldnt get in ahead of Mahrez. Dembele wouldn't get in ahead of Kante or Drinky either. No Spurs player would get into our team. No chance!!
posted on 28/3/16
But yet Dier gets in ahead of Drinky for his country.
As for Kane, i think Ranieri is an excellent manager and i don't think for one second he would fail to find a place for Kane, without question the best England striker the last two seasons.
posted on 28/3/16
comment by Cinciwolf----KoP champion, HC+DG champion, officially paid for being here-----$254 (U11551)
posted 3 minutes ago
But yet Dier gets in ahead of Drinky for his country.
As for Kane, i think Ranieri is an excellent manager and i don't think for one second he would fail to find a place for Kane, without question the best England striker the last two seasons.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Drinky has just been called up to the England team and is a different player to Dier. Drinky is a box to box whereas Dier is defensive. Drinky's passing piiisses all over Dier's. He would not get in our team ahead of Kante.
Kane wouldn't be fitted into our team because he doesn't suit our style of play, simple as that. Kramaric didn't get a chance because he lacked the stamina to be able to play in our team, it wasn't his ability. Ranieri said he's a fantastic player, a great finisher, very skillful and has a great attitude but said "he needs time to rest and recover and we can't afford to have players who need to rest" and Kane couldn't do that.
You don't know what you're talking about. Kane would never get into our team.
posted on 28/3/16
Amazing how this legendary Leicester sid came about isn't it.
So so good from nowhere that nobody can even break into the side.
Remarkable.
posted on 28/3/16
comment by Cinciwolf----KoP champion, HC+DG champion, officially paid for being here-----$254 (U11551)
posted 8 minutes ago
Amazing how this legendary Leicester sid came about isn't it.
So so good from nowhere that nobody can even break into the side.
Remarkable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That makes absolutely no sense at all, what are you trying to say?
posted on 28/3/16
Basically that you talk the biggest load of crap i have ever heard on a forum.
Somehow you have convinced yourself that this Leicester side is some force of nature and no other team comes near it.
Even more remarkably you have somehow convinced yourself Leicester are considerably better than Spurs despite being outplayed by Spurs four times this season.
Literally a one goal swing would have Spurs sitting top of the table rather than you right now, and that goal you scored was a from a feckin corner, hardly some footballing master class.
In that same game you were battered and Spurs had numerous chances, on another day you would have been beaten.
It is such a shame that you cannot find it in yourself to be remotely honest about the situation at hand and dismiss a very good Spurs side as being anywhere near you in standard and trashing all of their players.
It is frankly ridiculous and makes you look a complete moron.
posted on 28/3/16
I don't class Spurs as outplaying us, we allowed them the ball and they did fook all with it. There's more than one way of playing football and the way we play as a team is more efficient than Spurs and our players fit it perfectly.
Last 40 games Spurs have won 72 points and have lost seven, we've won 88 points and lost four and the fact is they didn't beat us and we are top. They beat our rezzies and couldn't beat our first XI! Take your shiiitt argument somewhere else!
You know what, you offer nothing to our board other than slagg
posted on 28/3/16
^ slagging us off. You don't know anything about football and your days of commenting on my articles are over. I'm sick of your bullshiitt and your love for Spurs so go and share your adoration with them because I'm not interested in your ridiculous view!
posted on 28/3/16
I wish there were more slagg on the Arsenal board
posted on 28/3/16
Dammit Arro you finished your comment too soon
posted on 28/3/16
Yeah I couldn't have accidently pressed send at a better time ha ha 😂
posted on 28/3/16
comment by arrothefoxinoz (U8567)
posted 29 minutes ago
I don't class Spurs as outplaying us, we allowed them the ball and they did fook all with it. There's more than one way of playing football and the way we play as a team is more efficient than Spurs and our players fit it perfectly.
Last 40 games Spurs have won 72 points and have lost seven, we've won 88 points and lost four and the fact is they didn't beat us and we are top. They beat our rezzies and couldn't beat our first XI! Take your shiiitt argument somewhere else!
You know what, you offer nothing to our board other than slagg
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is a shame you have to keep repeating this point Arro, seems that they just won't let it drop.
posted on 28/3/16
comment by BraveheartTyke (U6173)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by arrothefoxinoz (U8567)
posted 29 minutes ago
I don't class Spurs as outplaying us, we allowed them the ball and they did fook all with it. There's more than one way of playing football and the way we play as a team is more efficient than Spurs and our players fit it perfectly.
Last 40 games Spurs have won 72 points and have lost seven, we've won 88 points and lost four and the fact is they didn't beat us and we are top. They beat our rezzies and couldn't beat our first XI! Take your shiiitt argument somewhere else!
You know what, you offer nothing to our board other than slagg
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is a shame you have to keep repeating this point Arro, seems that they just won't let it drop.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know mate but I won't be repeating it again because his time is done and he won't be commenting on any of my articles anymore.
posted on 28/3/16
Please could you clarify what you mean by your defence has conceded less than Spurs?
posted on 28/3/16
comment by Scribe is back (U18092)
posted 14 minutes ago
Please could you clarify what you mean by your defence has conceded less than Spurs?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Certainly.
In the first seven games we conceded 14 goals when playing essentially two wingers at full back. Schlupp is a winger who Pearson utilised as a left back but he certainly isn't and De Laet is on loan at Boro as a winger.
Ranieri changed full backs when he could, in other words after a defeat, since then we have conceded less goals and kept more clean sheets than Spurs.
So comparing our current back five of Schmeichel, Simpson, Morgan, Huth and Fuchs with Spurs' Lloris, Walker, Alderwiereld, Verts/Wimmer and Rose and we have the better defence.
Hope that's clarified it for you 👍
posted on 28/3/16
Bore of the same Arro
Those Spurs players would walk into any team in the Premiership. Kane and Vardy up front for LCFC you would not want that why? Let me guess blinded by your own prejudice. finally in the highlights Roy did celebrate and went for a littles dance.
None are so blind as those who don't want see.
Page 1 of 4