theres going to be some serious backtracking from the media on this.
A few "moral" types who had a pop because he had the temerity to continue claiming innocence.
It was a dodgy conviction from the start
the CPS must still think they have a case if their retrying him
this isn't finished just yet!
comment by The Facking Happy Gaffer Pranks (U6283)
posted 20 seconds ago
the CPS must still think they have a case if their retrying him
this isn't finished just yet!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who knows what/who the new evidence ends up implicating!?
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
It was the CCRC that ordered the retrial, I think the CPS has to prosecute whether there is a case or not.
Though I may be grossly ignorant right there.
If the new evidence indicates he did nothing wrong he has the right to go back to court and be declared not guilty and have the media and people who discredit him know it.
The man served 2 and a half years in prison and lost 4 years of a short career.
Hopefully they will take the girl that made these false rape allegations to court so she can serve justice.
It was a completely a joke conviction. If getting drunk, having s£x and then regretting it in the morning is being raped then who hasn't been raped?
Ridiculous conviction and the media slammed him for protesting his innocence. Ruined the lads life
X amount coming out and saying just accept the decision, Jessica ennis threatening to have her name removed if sheff utd sign him.
Then there's people who will say no smoke without fire etc etc
How did they find him guilty in the 1st place
Why did she willingly go to his hotel with him at that time of night/morning ?
What was she expecting was going to happen ?
It all stinks of a stitch up to me.
The CCRC hasn't got any power to order a re-trial; that is the sole remit of the Court of Appeal. Clearly the 'new' evidence has had a bearing on the legitimacy of the original verdict by the jury, so, back it goes to trial. That's if the CPS are of the view, taking into consideration the new evidence and its impact, that there is still a reasonable liklihood of conviction. If not, or, say, prosecution witnesses don't want to go through with the trial again they may chuck the towel in.
JimmyTheRed
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
he is a rapist skumbag, rich footballer who thought he was above the law..................
and his bint off a girlfriend stands by him even if he was innocent he cheated on her and had a 3some behind her back, shows how desperate she is to be a WAG...........
However i think he will get off with it although hopefully his football career is over........
Not having been a member of the jury, and not having heard all of the evidence in the trial in its entirety, I won't jump to the seemingly inevitable conclusion that he was or is 'a rapist skumbag' etc., I will let justice take its course instead.
JimmyTheRed
We have access to the bbc website and many others like it that share this news, thanks.
Pointless post.
M
comment by Mclanelli (U20318)
posted 6 hours, 18 minutes ago
We have access to the bbc website and many others like it that share this news, thanks.
Pointless post.
M
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Some people do not have the access to other sites or are not able to click on some links while at work.
Can't have been that pointless if you decided to read the post and then also make a comment.
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
Ched Evans: Rape conviction quashed
Page 1 of 1
posted on 21/4/16
theres going to be some serious backtracking from the media on this.
A few "moral" types who had a pop because he had the temerity to continue claiming innocence.
It was a dodgy conviction from the start
posted on 21/4/16
the CPS must still think they have a case if their retrying him
this isn't finished just yet!
posted on 21/4/16
comment by The Facking Happy Gaffer Pranks (U6283)
posted 20 seconds ago
the CPS must still think they have a case if their retrying him
this isn't finished just yet!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who knows what/who the new evidence ends up implicating!?
posted on 21/4/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 21/4/16
It was the CCRC that ordered the retrial, I think the CPS has to prosecute whether there is a case or not.
Though I may be grossly ignorant right there.
posted on 21/4/16
If the new evidence indicates he did nothing wrong he has the right to go back to court and be declared not guilty and have the media and people who discredit him know it.
The man served 2 and a half years in prison and lost 4 years of a short career.
posted on 21/4/16
Hopefully they will take the girl that made these false rape allegations to court so she can serve justice.
It was a completely a joke conviction. If getting drunk, having s£x and then regretting it in the morning is being raped then who hasn't been raped?
posted on 21/4/16
Ridiculous conviction and the media slammed him for protesting his innocence. Ruined the lads life
X amount coming out and saying just accept the decision, Jessica ennis threatening to have her name removed if sheff utd sign him.
Then there's people who will say no smoke without fire etc etc
How did they find him guilty in the 1st place
posted on 21/4/16
Why did she willingly go to his hotel with him at that time of night/morning ?
What was she expecting was going to happen ?
It all stinks of a stitch up to me.
posted on 21/4/16
The CCRC hasn't got any power to order a re-trial; that is the sole remit of the Court of Appeal. Clearly the 'new' evidence has had a bearing on the legitimacy of the original verdict by the jury, so, back it goes to trial. That's if the CPS are of the view, taking into consideration the new evidence and its impact, that there is still a reasonable liklihood of conviction. If not, or, say, prosecution witnesses don't want to go through with the trial again they may chuck the towel in.
JimmyTheRed
posted on 21/4/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 21/4/16
he is a rapist skumbag, rich footballer who thought he was above the law..................
and his bint off a girlfriend stands by him even if he was innocent he cheated on her and had a 3some behind her back, shows how desperate she is to be a WAG...........
However i think he will get off with it although hopefully his football career is over........
posted on 21/4/16
Not having been a member of the jury, and not having heard all of the evidence in the trial in its entirety, I won't jump to the seemingly inevitable conclusion that he was or is 'a rapist skumbag' etc., I will let justice take its course instead.
JimmyTheRed
posted on 22/4/16
We have access to the bbc website and many others like it that share this news, thanks.
Pointless post.
M
posted on 22/4/16
comment by Mclanelli (U20318)
posted 6 hours, 18 minutes ago
We have access to the bbc website and many others like it that share this news, thanks.
Pointless post.
M
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Some people do not have the access to other sites or are not able to click on some links while at work.
Can't have been that pointless if you decided to read the post and then also make a comment.
Page 1 of 1