comment by really? (U17250)
posted 45 minutes ago
Boris and really?, what are your thoughts on the BBC report**
BBC report is where I finished reading, every single day without fail they have promoted staying in the EU, for a supposedly impartial broadcaster it's an astonishing display of bias
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not an editorial piece.
They are quoting people sitting across the Commons who are saying MPs, cross-party, will move to implement a Norway-type approach in a Brexit scenario.
Freedom of movement will remain and immigration policy will not change.
comment by rossobianchi - Vote Drizzle! (U17054)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by really? (U17250)
posted 45 minutes ago
Boris and really?, what are your thoughts on the BBC report**
BBC report is where I finished reading, every single day without fail they have promoted staying in the EU, for a supposedly impartial broadcaster it's an astonishing display of bias
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not an editorial piece.
They are quoting people sitting across the Commons who are saying MPs, cross-party, will move to implement a Norway-type approach in a Brexit scenario.
Freedom of movement will remain and immigration policy will not change.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s only a matter of time before Boris et all unveils Chewbacca.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chewbacca_defense
It's not an editorial piece.
They are quoting people sitting across the Commons who are saying MPs, cross-party, will move to implement a Norway-type approach in a Brexit scenario.
Freedom of movement will remain and immigration policy will not change.**
Like I said they are trying to convince the public to vote to remain, it's not just about editorial pieces, pro-remain articles are at the top of the news feed, the odd pro-leave article is hidden in amongst other news, I stopped reading at the words BBC, sorry
I'm sure transcripts/quotes from the House of Commons debate may be available elsewhere if the BBC is not to your liking.
If so, would they will be partisan too?
comment by really? (U17250)
posted 11 minutes ago
It's not an editorial piece.
They are quoting people sitting across the Commons who are saying MPs, cross-party, will move to implement a Norway-type approach in a Brexit scenario.
Freedom of movement will remain and immigration policy will not change.**
Like I said they are trying to convince the public to vote to remain, it's not just about editorial pieces, pro-remain articles are at the top of the news feed, the odd pro-leave article is hidden in amongst other news, I stopped reading at the words BBC, sorry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The same story is being reported by the Independent, Guardian and Mail if you prefer any of those outlets
I'm guessing this would be your number one choice; there you go:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3627618/Pro-EU-MPs-plot-guerilla-war-BLOCK-Brexit-rules-immigration-trade-voters-decide-quit-EU.html
Freedom of movement will remain and immigration policy will not change.
-----------------------
Of course it won't change till there is a renegotiation. Do you think MPs can dismiss outcome of a referendum? Every MP who would even suggest such a thing would lose their seat. This is not the middle east where governments can ignore public opinion.
However if the EU refuse to negotiate that principle Britain would be forced to leave. That will precipitate a collapse of the EU. Something no one in the Eurozone wants. It will literally mean the bankruptcy of 4 first world trading powers (Spain, Italy, Greece and Portugal) and throw the world into a deep economic depression. This is why they will give in. Which actually doesn't mean as much because the UK is not a part of the Eurozone or Schengen. Which is why it was such an idiocy of the Polish prime minister in blocking Cameron's reform proposals with Merkel. None of this would be even happening if the EU had agreed to a suspension of freedom of movement of people whilst the Eurzone sorted itself out.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
If the EU simply granted every country a veto on every law then brexit wouldn't even be up for discussion
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Ah, poor diddums.
So thin skinned, you think the world is out to get you.
Tom Watson called the stick she got embarrasing, and the petition had to be taken down as it was being used for sexist abuse.
Bravo
If so, would they will be partisan too?**
No, I don't have to pay a fee to the others for peddling their crap though
Like I said the other day now I personally have gone past the point of 'expert' lies/facts/opinions delete as applicable and I think alot of other people have as well
My mind was made up a long time ago, it's just a case of waiting for the day now.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Jenius99 (U4918)
posted 40 minutes ago
Freedom of movement will remain and immigration policy will not change.
-----------------------
Of course it won't change till there is a renegotiation. Do you think MPs can dismiss outcome of a referendum? Every MP who would even suggest such a thing would lose their seat. This is not the middle east where governments can ignore public opinion.
However if the EU refuse to negotiate that principle Britain would be forced to leave. That will precipitate a collapse of the EU. Something no one in the Eurozone wants. It will literally mean the bankruptcy of 4 first world trading powers (Spain, Italy, Greece and Portugal) and throw the world into a deep economic depression. This is why they will give in. Which actually doesn't mean as much because the UK is not a part of the Eurozone or Schengen. Which is why it was such an idiocy of the Polish prime minister in blocking Cameron's reform proposals with Merkel. None of this would be even happening if the EU had agreed to a suspension of freedom of movement of people whilst the Eurzone sorted itself out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There's no access to the single market without freedom of movement, for two reasons: firstly, because it would be the EU signing it's own death warrant, and secondly, even if all the other countries in the Union decided to make a special case of the UK, it simply wouldn't work as a macroeconomic model.
And what happens to all the MPs who watch Britain leave, the country exit the single market, the pound plummet and the economy enter into recession. You think they'll be reelected?
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Sizzle - have you had a smoke today?
It's not helping you at all Brother/Sister
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by really? (U17250)
posted 53 minutes ago
If so, would they will be partisan too?**
No, I don't have to pay a fee to the others for peddling their crap though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsure how the BBC licence fee is in any way relevant how they have reported the commons debate.
In that it appears they have reported exactly the same as the rest of the media.
Inter-board posting anf JA Brexit vote
Page 78 of 97
79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83
posted on 6/6/16
comment by really? (U17250)
posted 45 minutes ago
Boris and really?, what are your thoughts on the BBC report**
BBC report is where I finished reading, every single day without fail they have promoted staying in the EU, for a supposedly impartial broadcaster it's an astonishing display of bias
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not an editorial piece.
They are quoting people sitting across the Commons who are saying MPs, cross-party, will move to implement a Norway-type approach in a Brexit scenario.
Freedom of movement will remain and immigration policy will not change.
posted on 6/6/16
comment by rossobianchi - Vote Drizzle! (U17054)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by really? (U17250)
posted 45 minutes ago
Boris and really?, what are your thoughts on the BBC report**
BBC report is where I finished reading, every single day without fail they have promoted staying in the EU, for a supposedly impartial broadcaster it's an astonishing display of bias
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not an editorial piece.
They are quoting people sitting across the Commons who are saying MPs, cross-party, will move to implement a Norway-type approach in a Brexit scenario.
Freedom of movement will remain and immigration policy will not change.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s only a matter of time before Boris et all unveils Chewbacca.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chewbacca_defense
posted on 6/6/16
It's not an editorial piece.
They are quoting people sitting across the Commons who are saying MPs, cross-party, will move to implement a Norway-type approach in a Brexit scenario.
Freedom of movement will remain and immigration policy will not change.**
Like I said they are trying to convince the public to vote to remain, it's not just about editorial pieces, pro-remain articles are at the top of the news feed, the odd pro-leave article is hidden in amongst other news, I stopped reading at the words BBC, sorry
posted on 6/6/16
I'm sure transcripts/quotes from the House of Commons debate may be available elsewhere if the BBC is not to your liking.
posted on 6/6/16
I'm sure they are
posted on 6/6/16
If so, would they will be partisan too?
posted on 6/6/16
comment by really? (U17250)
posted 11 minutes ago
It's not an editorial piece.
They are quoting people sitting across the Commons who are saying MPs, cross-party, will move to implement a Norway-type approach in a Brexit scenario.
Freedom of movement will remain and immigration policy will not change.**
Like I said they are trying to convince the public to vote to remain, it's not just about editorial pieces, pro-remain articles are at the top of the news feed, the odd pro-leave article is hidden in amongst other news, I stopped reading at the words BBC, sorry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The same story is being reported by the Independent, Guardian and Mail if you prefer any of those outlets
posted on 6/6/16
I'm guessing this would be your number one choice; there you go:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3627618/Pro-EU-MPs-plot-guerilla-war-BLOCK-Brexit-rules-immigration-trade-voters-decide-quit-EU.html
posted on 6/6/16
Freedom of movement will remain and immigration policy will not change.
-----------------------
Of course it won't change till there is a renegotiation. Do you think MPs can dismiss outcome of a referendum? Every MP who would even suggest such a thing would lose their seat. This is not the middle east where governments can ignore public opinion.
However if the EU refuse to negotiate that principle Britain would be forced to leave. That will precipitate a collapse of the EU. Something no one in the Eurozone wants. It will literally mean the bankruptcy of 4 first world trading powers (Spain, Italy, Greece and Portugal) and throw the world into a deep economic depression. This is why they will give in. Which actually doesn't mean as much because the UK is not a part of the Eurozone or Schengen. Which is why it was such an idiocy of the Polish prime minister in blocking Cameron's reform proposals with Merkel. None of this would be even happening if the EU had agreed to a suspension of freedom of movement of people whilst the Eurzone sorted itself out.
posted on 6/6/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 6/6/16
If the EU simply granted every country a veto on every law then brexit wouldn't even be up for discussion
posted on 6/6/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 6/6/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 6/6/16
Ah, poor diddums.
So thin skinned, you think the world is out to get you.
Tom Watson called the stick she got embarrasing, and the petition had to be taken down as it was being used for sexist abuse.
Bravo
posted on 6/6/16
If so, would they will be partisan too?**
No, I don't have to pay a fee to the others for peddling their crap though
posted on 6/6/16
Like I said the other day now I personally have gone past the point of 'expert' lies/facts/opinions delete as applicable and I think alot of other people have as well
My mind was made up a long time ago, it's just a case of waiting for the day now.
posted on 6/6/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 6/6/16
comment by Jenius99 (U4918)
posted 40 minutes ago
Freedom of movement will remain and immigration policy will not change.
-----------------------
Of course it won't change till there is a renegotiation. Do you think MPs can dismiss outcome of a referendum? Every MP who would even suggest such a thing would lose their seat. This is not the middle east where governments can ignore public opinion.
However if the EU refuse to negotiate that principle Britain would be forced to leave. That will precipitate a collapse of the EU. Something no one in the Eurozone wants. It will literally mean the bankruptcy of 4 first world trading powers (Spain, Italy, Greece and Portugal) and throw the world into a deep economic depression. This is why they will give in. Which actually doesn't mean as much because the UK is not a part of the Eurozone or Schengen. Which is why it was such an idiocy of the Polish prime minister in blocking Cameron's reform proposals with Merkel. None of this would be even happening if the EU had agreed to a suspension of freedom of movement of people whilst the Eurzone sorted itself out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There's no access to the single market without freedom of movement, for two reasons: firstly, because it would be the EU signing it's own death warrant, and secondly, even if all the other countries in the Union decided to make a special case of the UK, it simply wouldn't work as a macroeconomic model.
And what happens to all the MPs who watch Britain leave, the country exit the single market, the pound plummet and the economy enter into recession. You think they'll be reelected?
posted on 6/6/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 6/6/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 6/6/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 6/6/16
Sizzle - have you had a smoke today?
It's not helping you at all Brother/Sister
posted on 6/6/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 6/6/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 6/6/16
comment by really? (U17250)
posted 53 minutes ago
If so, would they will be partisan too?**
No, I don't have to pay a fee to the others for peddling their crap though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsure how the BBC licence fee is in any way relevant how they have reported the commons debate.
In that it appears they have reported exactly the same as the rest of the media.
Page 78 of 97
79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83