Comment deleted by Site Moderator
8bit
Whilst the are obviously lobbyists on both sides of Congress, just because many donors have abandoned ties with his campaign, does not render him immune to lobbyists if he was to win the presidency.
He's spent his entire adult life exploiting others for financial gain.
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 18 minutes ago
I'm convinced Kasic/Rubio possibly even "Jeb!" could have beaten her on a national stage. Her trustworthiness is a major issue.
...............
Ted Cruz would have beaten her.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thank feck he's not running then, because he's arguably more dangerous than Trump.
Trump is running for Trump and he is the 1% of the 1%. If you don't think that Trump does not have any special interest in any of this then you are off your head.
.............
8bit is just wumming here. If he isn't he really needs to do some research because he clearly knows nothing about Trump.
comment by The Lambeau Leap (U21050)
posted 3 minutes ago
Is Trump really that dangerous, though? With all of the checks and balances in the US system, could he really do that much harm? Furthermore, will anything he does be as bad as what Obama and Clinton have already done in the Middle East? There's a lot of pots in Washington.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
from hearing his foreign policy the world will be a safer place. Clinton is responsible for destroying Libya and all the mess that it's caused. We intervened in Syria to make things better and it's only escalated the carnage. She supported the Iraq war which created the vacuum and allowed ISIS to grow. It's crazy when people say Trump will make the world more dangerous and ignore what's been going on in recent times. And trump said he opposed the iraq war, there is no evidence and he is probably lying but he came out soon after to say it was a mistake and will destabilise the middle east which has proved to be 100% right.
comment by 8bit (U2653)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by The Lambeau Leap (U21050)
posted 3 minutes ago
Is Trump really that dangerous, though? With all of the checks and balances in the US system, could he really do that much harm? Furthermore, will anything he does be as bad as what Obama and Clinton have already done in the Middle East? There's a lot of pots in Washington.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
from hearing his foreign policy the world will be a safer place. Clinton is responsible for destroying Libya and all the mess that it's caused. We intervened in Syria to make things better and it's only escalated the carnage. She supported the Iraq war which created the vacuum and allowed ISIS to grow. It's crazy when people say Trump will make the world more dangerous and ignore what's been going on in recent times. And trump said he opposed the iraq war, there is no evidence and he is probably lying but he came out soon after to say it was a mistake and will destabilise the middle east which has proved to be 100% right.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 4 minutes ago
8bit
Whilst the are obviously lobbyists on both sides of Congress, just because many donors have abandoned ties with his campaign, does not render him immune to lobbyists if he was to win the presidency.
He's spent his entire adult life exploiting others for financial gain.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
our governments exploit people for financial gain, we live in a society that is corrupt from the top down and encourages a dog eat dog mentality. So when someone like Trump displays that kind of behaviour and everyone jumps on him (especially the media one of the most corrupt industries out there) it I find it so hypocritical. He is astute and has a sharp brain, I agree with him when he said America needs someone with that kind of thinking over another establishment stooge like Clinton.
comment by 8bit (U2653)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by The Lambeau Leap (U21050)
posted 3 minutes ago
Is Trump really that dangerous, though? With all of the checks and balances in the US system, could he really do that much harm? Furthermore, will anything he does be as bad as what Obama and Clinton have already done in the Middle East? There's a lot of pots in Washington.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
from hearing his foreign policy the world will be a safer place. Clinton is responsible for destroying Libya and all the mess that it's caused. We intervened in Syria to make things better and it's only escalated the carnage. She supported the Iraq war which created the vacuum and allowed ISIS to grow. It's crazy when people say Trump will make the world more dangerous and ignore what's been going on in recent times. And trump said he opposed the iraq war, there is no evidence and he is probably lying but he came out soon after to say it was a mistake and will destabilise the middle east which has proved to be 100% right.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Even if that was entirely accurate, going with Trump instead of Clinton based on the US's prospective approach to foreign policy would be the equivalent of, having mortgaged your life to the hilt, then taking out a final payday loan and putting it all on the lottery.
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 25 minutes ago
I'm convinced Kasic/Rubio possibly even "Jeb!" could have beaten her on a national stage. Her trustworthiness is a major issue.
...............
Ted Cruz would have beaten her.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not convinced Cruz would have. Would have been close though. Comes across as a typical sleazy politician along with a far right ideology isn't a great combo. The extremes on both sides only work if you're seen as an outsider
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by rossobianchi - Rock the Pogbah (U17054)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by 8bit (U2653)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by The Lambeau Leap (U21050)
posted 3 minutes ago
Is Trump really that dangerous, though? With all of the checks and balances in the US system, could he really do that much harm? Furthermore, will anything he does be as bad as what Obama and Clinton have already done in the Middle East? There's a lot of pots in Washington.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
from hearing his foreign policy the world will be a safer place. Clinton is responsible for destroying Libya and all the mess that it's caused. We intervened in Syria to make things better and it's only escalated the carnage. She supported the Iraq war which created the vacuum and allowed ISIS to grow. It's crazy when people say Trump will make the world more dangerous and ignore what's been going on in recent times. And trump said he opposed the iraq war, there is no evidence and he is probably lying but he came out soon after to say it was a mistake and will destabilise the middle east which has proved to be 100% right.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Even if that was entirely accurate, going with Trump instead of Clinton based on the US's prospective approach to foreign policy would be the equivalent of, having mortgaged your life to the hilt, then taking out a final payday loan and putting it all on the lottery.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think Trump is dangerous at all. Anyone who threatens the establishment is made out to look dangerous, you're a Corbyb fan would you agree the same thing happens with him over here.
comment by Brightdave: (U11711)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by 8bit (U2653)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 4 minutes ago
8bit
Whilst the are obviously lobbyists on both sides of Congress, just because many donors have abandoned ties with his campaign, does not render him immune to lobbyists if he was to win the presidency.
He's spent his entire adult life exploiting others for financial gain.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
our governments exploit people for financial gain, we live in a society that is corrupt from the top down and encourages a dog eat dog mentality. So when someone like Trump displays that kind of behaviour and everyone jumps on him (especially the media one of the most corrupt industries out there) it I find it so hypocritical. He is astute and has a sharp brain, I agree with him when he said America needs someone with that kind of thinking over another establishment stooge like Clinton.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you're basically advocating handing the keys to the asylum to the number one serial offending inmate.
Vc, I don't think he's wumming, but if he is I've bitten good and proper
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On a scale of one to ten, would you say you have 8bitten?
comment by Brightdave: (U11711)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by 8bit (U2653)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 4 minutes ago
8bit
Whilst the are obviously lobbyists on both sides of Congress, just because many donors have abandoned ties with his campaign, does not render him immune to lobbyists if he was to win the presidency.
He's spent his entire adult life exploiting others for financial gain.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
our governments exploit people for financial gain, we live in a society that is corrupt from the top down and encourages a dog eat dog mentality. So when someone like Trump displays that kind of behaviour and everyone jumps on him (especially the media one of the most corrupt industries out there) it I find it so hypocritical. He is astute and has a sharp brain, I agree with him when he said America needs someone with that kind of thinking over another establishment stooge like Clinton.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you're basically advocating handing the keys to the asylum to the number one serial offending inmate.
Vc, I don't think he's wumming, but if he is I've bitten good and proper
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, he's wumming.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by 8bit (U2653)
posted 33 seconds ago
Not wumming
.............
Surely you are not this ill informed.
For example 'She supported the Iraq war which created the vacuum and allowed ISIS to grow..' so did Trump. He is on tape supporting the Iraq war.
'from hearing his foreign policy the world will be a safer place.'.
He hasn't mentioned foreign policy, or how he is going to carry it out.
Is he wumming, or does he just have a different opinion? Can those two things even be mutually exclusive on this site?
Is he wumming
............
He usually is. If it is his opinion, it is a very poorly educated and researched one.
Trump is very similar to our old little chubby friend Rafa, in that his facts are not facts at all but complete fabrications or gross distortions of the truth.
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by 8bit (U2653)
posted 33 seconds ago
Not wumming
.............
Surely you are not this ill informed.
For example 'She supported the Iraq war which created the vacuum and allowed ISIS to grow..' so did Trump. He is on tape supporting the Iraq war.
'from hearing his foreign policy the world will be a safer place.'.
He hasn't mentioned foreign policy, or how he is going to carry it out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
many people had initial support for the war based on the lies told to us about WMD's and Saddam's role in 9/11. Trump wasn't in politics then he cannot be critised in the same way as Clinton. Just did a quick google search in March 2003 when the Iraq war started Trump said it was a mess. Way before anymore else figured that out.
Donald trump is a narcissist and will be very likely to start WW III if he elected.
Hillary and Bill committed so many crimes and they are 100% untrustworthy.
America is screwed either way
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 2 minutes ago
Is he wumming
............
He usually is. If it is his opinion, it is a very poorly educated and researched one.
Trump is very similar to our old little chubby friend Rafa, in that his facts are not facts at all but complete fabrications or gross distortions of the truth.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Feel free to correct anything that is not true.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
So much of the US election has surrounded prior decision making. Both have been proven to be suspect.
If (as many unfortunately do) DT is to be believed, HC made each and every administration decision on her own, without any involvement of the Senate/Congress. The mere fact she is a politician appears to be cannon fodder for Trump.
Regretfully most of DT’s policies remain unknown/unclear. e.g.
What’s you plan on – INSERT TOPIC??
“I have a great plan...a plan that will work because it's the best plan”
How?
“I’m going to be strong. Very strong, I can assure you. Very strong…” It’s going to be beautiful, it’ll be great.”
You get the picture. It’s all utter bull…t
Trump wasn't in politics then he cannot be critised in the same way as Clinton.
..................
Yes he can. It was his party that spread the lies, not Clinton's. One could use your very weak argument for Clinton as well.
..................
Feel free to correct anything that is not true.
................
The fact checkers have a website for it. Do your own research, it will save you making a fool of yourself as you are not wumming, just ignorant.
When race relations in the US are in an already precarious state is it wise to elect someone who is going to exacerbate the situation?
It's clear that Trump is incapable of tact in diplomacy which is a pre-requisite for the job. He's already branded Latin Americans as murders and rapists.
Trump or Clinton
Page 6 of 107
7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11
posted on 12/10/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 12/10/16
8bit
Whilst the are obviously lobbyists on both sides of Congress, just because many donors have abandoned ties with his campaign, does not render him immune to lobbyists if he was to win the presidency.
He's spent his entire adult life exploiting others for financial gain.
posted on 12/10/16
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 18 minutes ago
I'm convinced Kasic/Rubio possibly even "Jeb!" could have beaten her on a national stage. Her trustworthiness is a major issue.
...............
Ted Cruz would have beaten her.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thank feck he's not running then, because he's arguably more dangerous than Trump.
posted on 12/10/16
Trump is running for Trump and he is the 1% of the 1%. If you don't think that Trump does not have any special interest in any of this then you are off your head.
.............
8bit is just wumming here. If he isn't he really needs to do some research because he clearly knows nothing about Trump.
posted on 12/10/16
comment by The Lambeau Leap (U21050)
posted 3 minutes ago
Is Trump really that dangerous, though? With all of the checks and balances in the US system, could he really do that much harm? Furthermore, will anything he does be as bad as what Obama and Clinton have already done in the Middle East? There's a lot of pots in Washington.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
from hearing his foreign policy the world will be a safer place. Clinton is responsible for destroying Libya and all the mess that it's caused. We intervened in Syria to make things better and it's only escalated the carnage. She supported the Iraq war which created the vacuum and allowed ISIS to grow. It's crazy when people say Trump will make the world more dangerous and ignore what's been going on in recent times. And trump said he opposed the iraq war, there is no evidence and he is probably lying but he came out soon after to say it was a mistake and will destabilise the middle east which has proved to be 100% right.
posted on 12/10/16
comment by 8bit (U2653)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by The Lambeau Leap (U21050)
posted 3 minutes ago
Is Trump really that dangerous, though? With all of the checks and balances in the US system, could he really do that much harm? Furthermore, will anything he does be as bad as what Obama and Clinton have already done in the Middle East? There's a lot of pots in Washington.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
from hearing his foreign policy the world will be a safer place. Clinton is responsible for destroying Libya and all the mess that it's caused. We intervened in Syria to make things better and it's only escalated the carnage. She supported the Iraq war which created the vacuum and allowed ISIS to grow. It's crazy when people say Trump will make the world more dangerous and ignore what's been going on in recent times. And trump said he opposed the iraq war, there is no evidence and he is probably lying but he came out soon after to say it was a mistake and will destabilise the middle east which has proved to be 100% right.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 12/10/16
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 4 minutes ago
8bit
Whilst the are obviously lobbyists on both sides of Congress, just because many donors have abandoned ties with his campaign, does not render him immune to lobbyists if he was to win the presidency.
He's spent his entire adult life exploiting others for financial gain.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
our governments exploit people for financial gain, we live in a society that is corrupt from the top down and encourages a dog eat dog mentality. So when someone like Trump displays that kind of behaviour and everyone jumps on him (especially the media one of the most corrupt industries out there) it I find it so hypocritical. He is astute and has a sharp brain, I agree with him when he said America needs someone with that kind of thinking over another establishment stooge like Clinton.
posted on 12/10/16
comment by 8bit (U2653)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by The Lambeau Leap (U21050)
posted 3 minutes ago
Is Trump really that dangerous, though? With all of the checks and balances in the US system, could he really do that much harm? Furthermore, will anything he does be as bad as what Obama and Clinton have already done in the Middle East? There's a lot of pots in Washington.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
from hearing his foreign policy the world will be a safer place. Clinton is responsible for destroying Libya and all the mess that it's caused. We intervened in Syria to make things better and it's only escalated the carnage. She supported the Iraq war which created the vacuum and allowed ISIS to grow. It's crazy when people say Trump will make the world more dangerous and ignore what's been going on in recent times. And trump said he opposed the iraq war, there is no evidence and he is probably lying but he came out soon after to say it was a mistake and will destabilise the middle east which has proved to be 100% right.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Even if that was entirely accurate, going with Trump instead of Clinton based on the US's prospective approach to foreign policy would be the equivalent of, having mortgaged your life to the hilt, then taking out a final payday loan and putting it all on the lottery.
posted on 12/10/16
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 25 minutes ago
I'm convinced Kasic/Rubio possibly even "Jeb!" could have beaten her on a national stage. Her trustworthiness is a major issue.
...............
Ted Cruz would have beaten her.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not convinced Cruz would have. Would have been close though. Comes across as a typical sleazy politician along with a far right ideology isn't a great combo. The extremes on both sides only work if you're seen as an outsider
posted on 12/10/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 12/10/16
comment by rossobianchi - Rock the Pogbah (U17054)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by 8bit (U2653)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by The Lambeau Leap (U21050)
posted 3 minutes ago
Is Trump really that dangerous, though? With all of the checks and balances in the US system, could he really do that much harm? Furthermore, will anything he does be as bad as what Obama and Clinton have already done in the Middle East? There's a lot of pots in Washington.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
from hearing his foreign policy the world will be a safer place. Clinton is responsible for destroying Libya and all the mess that it's caused. We intervened in Syria to make things better and it's only escalated the carnage. She supported the Iraq war which created the vacuum and allowed ISIS to grow. It's crazy when people say Trump will make the world more dangerous and ignore what's been going on in recent times. And trump said he opposed the iraq war, there is no evidence and he is probably lying but he came out soon after to say it was a mistake and will destabilise the middle east which has proved to be 100% right.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Even if that was entirely accurate, going with Trump instead of Clinton based on the US's prospective approach to foreign policy would be the equivalent of, having mortgaged your life to the hilt, then taking out a final payday loan and putting it all on the lottery.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think Trump is dangerous at all. Anyone who threatens the establishment is made out to look dangerous, you're a Corbyb fan would you agree the same thing happens with him over here.
posted on 12/10/16
comment by Brightdave: (U11711)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by 8bit (U2653)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 4 minutes ago
8bit
Whilst the are obviously lobbyists on both sides of Congress, just because many donors have abandoned ties with his campaign, does not render him immune to lobbyists if he was to win the presidency.
He's spent his entire adult life exploiting others for financial gain.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
our governments exploit people for financial gain, we live in a society that is corrupt from the top down and encourages a dog eat dog mentality. So when someone like Trump displays that kind of behaviour and everyone jumps on him (especially the media one of the most corrupt industries out there) it I find it so hypocritical. He is astute and has a sharp brain, I agree with him when he said America needs someone with that kind of thinking over another establishment stooge like Clinton.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you're basically advocating handing the keys to the asylum to the number one serial offending inmate.
Vc, I don't think he's wumming, but if he is I've bitten good and proper
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On a scale of one to ten, would you say you have 8bitten?
posted on 12/10/16
comment by Brightdave: (U11711)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by 8bit (U2653)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 4 minutes ago
8bit
Whilst the are obviously lobbyists on both sides of Congress, just because many donors have abandoned ties with his campaign, does not render him immune to lobbyists if he was to win the presidency.
He's spent his entire adult life exploiting others for financial gain.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
our governments exploit people for financial gain, we live in a society that is corrupt from the top down and encourages a dog eat dog mentality. So when someone like Trump displays that kind of behaviour and everyone jumps on him (especially the media one of the most corrupt industries out there) it I find it so hypocritical. He is astute and has a sharp brain, I agree with him when he said America needs someone with that kind of thinking over another establishment stooge like Clinton.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you're basically advocating handing the keys to the asylum to the number one serial offending inmate.
Vc, I don't think he's wumming, but if he is I've bitten good and proper
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, he's wumming.
posted on 12/10/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 12/10/16
Not wumming
posted on 12/10/16
comment by 8bit (U2653)
posted 33 seconds ago
Not wumming
.............
Surely you are not this ill informed.
For example 'She supported the Iraq war which created the vacuum and allowed ISIS to grow..' so did Trump. He is on tape supporting the Iraq war.
'from hearing his foreign policy the world will be a safer place.'.
He hasn't mentioned foreign policy, or how he is going to carry it out.
posted on 12/10/16
Is he wumming, or does he just have a different opinion? Can those two things even be mutually exclusive on this site?
posted on 12/10/16
Is he wumming
............
He usually is. If it is his opinion, it is a very poorly educated and researched one.
Trump is very similar to our old little chubby friend Rafa, in that his facts are not facts at all but complete fabrications or gross distortions of the truth.
posted on 12/10/16
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by 8bit (U2653)
posted 33 seconds ago
Not wumming
.............
Surely you are not this ill informed.
For example 'She supported the Iraq war which created the vacuum and allowed ISIS to grow..' so did Trump. He is on tape supporting the Iraq war.
'from hearing his foreign policy the world will be a safer place.'.
He hasn't mentioned foreign policy, or how he is going to carry it out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
many people had initial support for the war based on the lies told to us about WMD's and Saddam's role in 9/11. Trump wasn't in politics then he cannot be critised in the same way as Clinton. Just did a quick google search in March 2003 when the Iraq war started Trump said it was a mess. Way before anymore else figured that out.
posted on 12/10/16
Donald trump is a narcissist and will be very likely to start WW III if he elected.
Hillary and Bill committed so many crimes and they are 100% untrustworthy.
America is screwed either way
posted on 12/10/16
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 2 minutes ago
Is he wumming
............
He usually is. If it is his opinion, it is a very poorly educated and researched one.
Trump is very similar to our old little chubby friend Rafa, in that his facts are not facts at all but complete fabrications or gross distortions of the truth.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Feel free to correct anything that is not true.
posted on 12/10/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 12/10/16
So much of the US election has surrounded prior decision making. Both have been proven to be suspect.
If (as many unfortunately do) DT is to be believed, HC made each and every administration decision on her own, without any involvement of the Senate/Congress. The mere fact she is a politician appears to be cannon fodder for Trump.
Regretfully most of DT’s policies remain unknown/unclear. e.g.
What’s you plan on – INSERT TOPIC??
“I have a great plan...a plan that will work because it's the best plan”
How?
“I’m going to be strong. Very strong, I can assure you. Very strong…” It’s going to be beautiful, it’ll be great.”
You get the picture. It’s all utter bull…t
posted on 12/10/16
Trump wasn't in politics then he cannot be critised in the same way as Clinton.
..................
Yes he can. It was his party that spread the lies, not Clinton's. One could use your very weak argument for Clinton as well.
..................
Feel free to correct anything that is not true.
................
The fact checkers have a website for it. Do your own research, it will save you making a fool of yourself as you are not wumming, just ignorant.
posted on 12/10/16
When race relations in the US are in an already precarious state is it wise to elect someone who is going to exacerbate the situation?
It's clear that Trump is incapable of tact in diplomacy which is a pre-requisite for the job. He's already branded Latin Americans as murders and rapists.
Page 6 of 107
7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11