Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Chronic (U3423)
posted 15 seconds ago
Your revenue and resources are behind Arsenal and Chelsea. Miles behind City and United. And you don't have any history of winning DNA at your club.
----------
united?
they are not exactly flying are they
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So far, no. But is not even November yet, so I would hold off the open-top bus parade.
Ultimately when they get the right combination of players/manager/director of sport/chief exec, which is a lot to sort I know, they will be smashing you to pieces again
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Wearethefamous THFC (U19211)
posted 3 minutes ago
Arsenal 435 euro, Chelsea 420m, Liverpool 391m, Spurs 257m.
So with just 36000 stadium for last 30 yrs we have done pretty well revenue wise and the new stadium with NFL revenue as well will def see us compete but its not about who makes the most money........ Utd have thrown millions at it since Fergi left and they are a shambles
We are doing just fine but thanks for your concern you chaaaaaav mug
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I agree. Yes, you are doing fine considering your size. Enjoy being top six and moderate your expectations to avoid disappointment
comment by CFC: FFP Champions (U20729)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by CFC: FFP Champions (U20729)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)
posted 8 minutes ago
If someone had said to me that a team has been unbeaten this far into the league, I'd assume they were at the top of the table. I mean it's great that we're so hard to beat but that is all such a waste if we aren't getting the job done at the other end.
The likes of Eriksen and Lamela, they need to step it up this season or we should seriously think about upgrading.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why? They are top-six club standard players at a top six club.
You are getting ahead of yourself thinking you should have top 4, Champions-League standard players across all positions at your club.
Last season was a one-off for you and Lesta.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah because if you're a top 6 club you should never strive to be anything more than that.
Why are Chelsea fans striving for more when they're a mid-table club then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You should strive to get top 4, of course. But thinking you can challenge for the title is deluded.
Your revenue and resources are behind Arsenal and Chelsea. Miles behind City and United. And you don't have any history of winning DNA at your club.
Levy needs to get the club revenue up to Arsenal and Chelsea's standard in order to compete for top 4 regularly season after season.
Arsenal 435 euro, Chelsea 420m, Liverpool 391m, Spurs 257m.
A new stadium will not bridge that financial gap. Commercial revenue dwarfs that and that is where Spurs are so far behind the 'big 5'.
Whether this is down to Levy not accelerating the commercial side at Spurs, or Spurs not being a big enough club to develop, is debatable
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool have spent hundreds of millions over the last 7 years and have made it into the top 4 once. Same with Chelsea and they have been in the top 4 just once more than us in the last 5.
We have the best defence in the league and one of the best strikers in the league. We should be in a title race.
comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by CFC: FFP Champions (U20729)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by CFC: FFP Champions (U20729)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)
posted 8 minutes ago
If someone had said to me that a team has been unbeaten this far into the league, I'd assume they were at the top of the table. I mean it's great that we're so hard to beat but that is all such a waste if we aren't getting the job done at the other end.
The likes of Eriksen and Lamela, they need to step it up this season or we should seriously think about upgrading.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why? They are top-six club standard players at a top six club.
You are getting ahead of yourself thinking you should have top 4, Champions-League standard players across all positions at your club.
Last season was a one-off for you and Lesta.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah because if you're a top 6 club you should never strive to be anything more than that.
Why are Chelsea fans striving for more when they're a mid-table club then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You should strive to get top 4, of course. But thinking you can challenge for the title is deluded.
Your revenue and resources are behind Arsenal and Chelsea. Miles behind City and United. And you don't have any history of winning DNA at your club.
Levy needs to get the club revenue up to Arsenal and Chelsea's standard in order to compete for top 4 regularly season after season.
Arsenal 435 euro, Chelsea 420m, Liverpool 391m, Spurs 257m.
A new stadium will not bridge that financial gap. Commercial revenue dwarfs that and that is where Spurs are so far behind the 'big 5'.
Whether this is down to Levy not accelerating the commercial side at Spurs, or Spurs not being a big enough club to develop, is debatable
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool have spent hundreds of millions over the last 7 years and have made it into the top 4 once. Same with Chelsea and they have been in the top 4 just once more than us in the last 5.
We have the best defence in the league and one of the best strikers in the league. We should be in a title race.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agree, Liverpool and Chelsea have spent more than Spurs. All earned fair and square from commercial revenue because they are bigger clubs.
And it is a big advantage. Which is why Chelsea have won Champions League, Premier League, FA Cup, League Cup and even Europey League.
They can afford to pay the best players big wages.
You should not be in title race. Be realistic,
This article is going well
comment by CFC: FFP Champions (U20729)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by CFC: FFP Champions (U20729)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by CFC: FFP Champions (U20729)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)
posted 8 minutes ago
If someone had said to me that a team has been unbeaten this far into the league, I'd assume they were at the top of the table. I mean it's great that we're so hard to beat but that is all such a waste if we aren't getting the job done at the other end.
The likes of Eriksen and Lamela, they need to step it up this season or we should seriously think about upgrading.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why? They are top-six club standard players at a top six club.
You are getting ahead of yourself thinking you should have top 4, Champions-League standard players across all positions at your club.
Last season was a one-off for you and Lesta.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah because if you're a top 6 club you should never strive to be anything more than that.
Why are Chelsea fans striving for more when they're a mid-table club then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You should strive to get top 4, of course. But thinking you can challenge for the title is deluded.
Your revenue and resources are behind Arsenal and Chelsea. Miles behind City and United. And you don't have any history of winning DNA at your club.
Levy needs to get the club revenue up to Arsenal and Chelsea's standard in order to compete for top 4 regularly season after season.
Arsenal 435 euro, Chelsea 420m, Liverpool 391m, Spurs 257m.
A new stadium will not bridge that financial gap. Commercial revenue dwarfs that and that is where Spurs are so far behind the 'big 5'.
Whether this is down to Levy not accelerating the commercial side at Spurs, or Spurs not being a big enough club to develop, is debatable
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool have spent hundreds of millions over the last 7 years and have made it into the top 4 once. Same with Chelsea and they have been in the top 4 just once more than us in the last 5.
We have the best defence in the league and one of the best strikers in the league. We should be in a title race.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agree, Liverpool and Chelsea have spent more than Spurs. All earned fair and square from commercial revenue because they are bigger clubs.
And it is a big advantage. Which is why Chelsea have won Champions League, Premier League, FA Cup, League Cup and even Europey League.
They can afford to pay the best players big wages.
You should not be in title race. Be realistic,
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So what you're saying is that Spurs have done brilliantly for overachieving with the lack of resources that other big teams have had?
Yes I agree. But we should still be in a title race as we have the quality in our side like other big teams, and are ambitious.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
talking rubbish but this is a chelsea fan so that's no surprise. Why shouldn't we be in the title race? I couldn't give a flying f** if Liverpool are a big club. We have finished about those muppets in 6 of the last 7 seasons so in recent history, it's normal for us to finish above them so how the hell do you come to the conclusion that Liverpool are realistic title contenders but spurs not? Not to mention we have one of the best sides in the league and the youngest. We should be challenging the title no doubt about it and will be for a long time so i suggest you just deal with it mate.
Reading the media today we are a disgrace and are bang on to be relegated I think it is grossly unfair and unjust.
We are the lowest conceding in the league and unbeaten that actually is good. You can look at it negative but look at it in a positive way.....
We are playing rubbish toothless and are without our two best players Toby and Harry. Two world class players the only two we have. Lloris is quality but never world class with his child like distribution and kicking.
There are positives to be had. We will improve when they return.
comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by CFC: FFP Champions (U20729)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by CFC: FFP Champions (U20729)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by CFC: FFP Champions (U20729)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)
posted 8 minutes ago
If someone had said to me that a team has been unbeaten this far into the league, I'd assume they were at the top of the table. I mean it's great that we're so hard to beat but that is all such a waste if we aren't getting the job done at the other end.
The likes of Eriksen and Lamela, they need to step it up this season or we should seriously think about upgrading.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why? They are top-six club standard players at a top six club.
You are getting ahead of yourself thinking you should have top 4, Champions-League standard players across all positions at your club.
Last season was a one-off for you and Lesta.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah because if you're a top 6 club you should never strive to be anything more than that.
Why are Chelsea fans striving for more when they're a mid-table club then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You should strive to get top 4, of course. But thinking you can challenge for the title is deluded.
Your revenue and resources are behind Arsenal and Chelsea. Miles behind City and United. And you don't have any history of winning DNA at your club.
Levy needs to get the club revenue up to Arsenal and Chelsea's standard in order to compete for top 4 regularly season after season.
Arsenal 435 euro, Chelsea 420m, Liverpool 391m, Spurs 257m.
A new stadium will not bridge that financial gap. Commercial revenue dwarfs that and that is where Spurs are so far behind the 'big 5'.
Whether this is down to Levy not accelerating the commercial side at Spurs, or Spurs not being a big enough club to develop, is debatable
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool have spent hundreds of millions over the last 7 years and have made it into the top 4 once. Same with Chelsea and they have been in the top 4 just once more than us in the last 5.
We have the best defence in the league and one of the best strikers in the league. We should be in a title race.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agree, Liverpool and Chelsea have spent more than Spurs. All earned fair and square from commercial revenue because they are bigger clubs.
And it is a big advantage. Which is why Chelsea have won Champions League, Premier League, FA Cup, League Cup and even Europey League.
They can afford to pay the best players big wages.
You should not be in title race. Be realistic,
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So what you're saying is that Spurs have done brilliantly for overachieving with the lack of resources that other big teams have had?
Yes I agree. But we should still be in a title race as we have the quality in our side like other big teams, and are ambitious.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes you did well overachieving - for once season - while Chelsea United Liverpool flopped.
Brilliantly? No. Lesta overachieved brilliantly.
Atletico are an example of a club overachievably brilliantly season after season. CL finals and league titles against with an even bigger advantage Real and Barca
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 7 minutes ago
talking rubbish but this is a chelsea fan so that's no surprise. Why shouldn't we be in the title race? I couldn't give a flying f** if Liverpool are a big club. We have finished about those muppets in 6 of the last 7 seasons so in recent history, it's normal for us to finish above them so how the hell do you come to the conclusion that Liverpool are realistic title contenders but spurs not? Not to mention we have one of the best sides in the league and the youngest. We should be challenging the title no doubt about it and will be for a long time so i suggest you just deal with it mate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I disagree. If and when Liverpool and United get their act together you will be pushed out of top 4 for forseeable future.
Top 4 for next few seasons: City. Chelsea. Two from Liverpool United Arsenal
Your team is overhyped
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 20 minutes ago
talking rubbish but this is a chelsea fan so that's no surprise. Why shouldn't we be in the title race? I couldn't give a flying f** if Liverpool are a big club. We have finished about those muppets in 6 of the last 7 seasons so in recent history, it's normal for us to finish above them so how the hell do you come to the conclusion that Liverpool are realistic title contenders but spurs not? Not to mention we have one of the best sides in the league and the youngest. We should be challenging the title no doubt about it and will be for a long time so i suggest you just deal with it mate.
---------------------
Just a touch bitey?
All this unbeaten talk is annoying. Not as if we've picked up points in loads of games we were expected to lose. 3 draws after the City game - 3 points out of 9 - feels like facking defeats anyway. Same as last season, not killing off the weaker teams.
Chronic, why are you entertaining that Chelsea rodent? Worthless scrote is obsessed with Spurs.
Similar to last season. Too many draws and seemingly not enough drive to grind out wins / too cautious not to drop points
I remember last season thinking "serves us right" after losing to Newcastle at home, as we showed very little ambition to win a game and were instead happy knocking the ball about in defense. Mind, after that defeat to Newcastle we got our shiet together, as if it was a wake up call. Maybe a loss (instead of another bunch of draws) wouldn't be such a bad thing
comment by Ledley's knee surgeon; Football Manager legend. (U20121)
posted 44 minutes ago
All this unbeaten talk is annoying. Not as if we've picked up points in loads of games we were expected to lose. 3 draws after the City game - 3 points out of 9 - feels like facking defeats anyway. Same as last season, not killing off the weaker teams.
Chronic, why are you entertaining that Chelsea rodent? Worthless scrote is obsessed with Spurs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
he does seem to spend an unhealthy amount of time here really.
comment by LukaCorluka (U1220)
posted 1 hour, 7 minutes ago
Similar to last season. Too many draws and seemingly not enough drive to grind out wins / too cautious not to drop points
I remember last season thinking "serves us right" after losing to Newcastle at home, as we showed very little ambition to win a game and were instead happy knocking the ball about in defense. Mind, after that defeat to Newcastle we got our shiet together, as if it was a wake up call. Maybe a loss (instead of another bunch of draws) wouldn't be such a bad thing
----------------------------------------------------------------------
well yeah, but we have arsenal west ham and Chelsea next.
fack losing any of those !
I disagree. If and when Liverpool and United get their act together you will be pushed out of top 4 for forseeable future.
Top 4 for next few seasons: City. Chelsea. Two from Liverpool United Arsenal
Your team is overhyped "
and your team are sh** and are just going through a little honeymoon spell. Chelsea will be back to abysmal performances in no time when the likes of Hazard etc can't be bothered. Big difference is spurs have a young side that actually want to play for eachother and the club. Your club consists of a bunch of expensive mishaps that at the flick of the switch decide they no longer want to play well for the club. Chelsea are going to find it hard to even get in the top 4 no doubt it/.. You are not on the level to win the title and you certainly ain't better than spurs
comment by CFC: FFP Champions (U20729)
posted 3 hours, 41 minutes ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 7 minutes ago
talking rubbish but this is a chelsea fan so that's no surprise. Why shouldn't we be in the title race? I couldn't give a flying f** if Liverpool are a big club. We have finished about those muppets in 6 of the last 7 seasons so in recent history, it's normal for us to finish above them so how the hell do you come to the conclusion that Liverpool are realistic title contenders but spurs not? Not to mention we have one of the best sides in the league and the youngest. We should be challenging the title no doubt about it and will be for a long time so i suggest you just deal with it mate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I disagree. If and when Liverpool and United get their act together you will be pushed out of top 4 for forseeable future.
Top 4 for next few seasons: City. Chelsea. Two from Liverpool United Arsenal
Your team is overhyped
----------------------------------------------------------------------
haha you dopey mug.... arsenal wont be going out the top 4 any time soon, they are the most consistent top 4 finisher and have been for ages.
if a team will miss out, it will be Chelsea, as you have done a couple of times recently
Chelsea are not even that good chronic as proved by their total spanking at the emirates. They are going through a good spell but will fall back down like a pack of cards in no time. Spurs are a better side than chelsea no doubt about it. We just need to get our act together.
Sign in if you want to comment
So Dissapointing
Page 3 of 4
posted on 31/10/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 31/10/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 31/10/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 31/10/16
comment by Chronic (U3423)
posted 15 seconds ago
Your revenue and resources are behind Arsenal and Chelsea. Miles behind City and United. And you don't have any history of winning DNA at your club.
----------
united?
they are not exactly flying are they
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So far, no. But is not even November yet, so I would hold off the open-top bus parade.
Ultimately when they get the right combination of players/manager/director of sport/chief exec, which is a lot to sort I know, they will be smashing you to pieces again
posted on 31/10/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 31/10/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 31/10/16
comment by Wearethefamous THFC (U19211)
posted 3 minutes ago
Arsenal 435 euro, Chelsea 420m, Liverpool 391m, Spurs 257m.
So with just 36000 stadium for last 30 yrs we have done pretty well revenue wise and the new stadium with NFL revenue as well will def see us compete but its not about who makes the most money........ Utd have thrown millions at it since Fergi left and they are a shambles
We are doing just fine but thanks for your concern you chaaaaaav mug
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I agree. Yes, you are doing fine considering your size. Enjoy being top six and moderate your expectations to avoid disappointment
posted on 31/10/16
comment by CFC: FFP Champions (U20729)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by CFC: FFP Champions (U20729)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)
posted 8 minutes ago
If someone had said to me that a team has been unbeaten this far into the league, I'd assume they were at the top of the table. I mean it's great that we're so hard to beat but that is all such a waste if we aren't getting the job done at the other end.
The likes of Eriksen and Lamela, they need to step it up this season or we should seriously think about upgrading.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why? They are top-six club standard players at a top six club.
You are getting ahead of yourself thinking you should have top 4, Champions-League standard players across all positions at your club.
Last season was a one-off for you and Lesta.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah because if you're a top 6 club you should never strive to be anything more than that.
Why are Chelsea fans striving for more when they're a mid-table club then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You should strive to get top 4, of course. But thinking you can challenge for the title is deluded.
Your revenue and resources are behind Arsenal and Chelsea. Miles behind City and United. And you don't have any history of winning DNA at your club.
Levy needs to get the club revenue up to Arsenal and Chelsea's standard in order to compete for top 4 regularly season after season.
Arsenal 435 euro, Chelsea 420m, Liverpool 391m, Spurs 257m.
A new stadium will not bridge that financial gap. Commercial revenue dwarfs that and that is where Spurs are so far behind the 'big 5'.
Whether this is down to Levy not accelerating the commercial side at Spurs, or Spurs not being a big enough club to develop, is debatable
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool have spent hundreds of millions over the last 7 years and have made it into the top 4 once. Same with Chelsea and they have been in the top 4 just once more than us in the last 5.
We have the best defence in the league and one of the best strikers in the league. We should be in a title race.
posted on 31/10/16
comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by CFC: FFP Champions (U20729)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by CFC: FFP Champions (U20729)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)
posted 8 minutes ago
If someone had said to me that a team has been unbeaten this far into the league, I'd assume they were at the top of the table. I mean it's great that we're so hard to beat but that is all such a waste if we aren't getting the job done at the other end.
The likes of Eriksen and Lamela, they need to step it up this season or we should seriously think about upgrading.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why? They are top-six club standard players at a top six club.
You are getting ahead of yourself thinking you should have top 4, Champions-League standard players across all positions at your club.
Last season was a one-off for you and Lesta.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah because if you're a top 6 club you should never strive to be anything more than that.
Why are Chelsea fans striving for more when they're a mid-table club then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You should strive to get top 4, of course. But thinking you can challenge for the title is deluded.
Your revenue and resources are behind Arsenal and Chelsea. Miles behind City and United. And you don't have any history of winning DNA at your club.
Levy needs to get the club revenue up to Arsenal and Chelsea's standard in order to compete for top 4 regularly season after season.
Arsenal 435 euro, Chelsea 420m, Liverpool 391m, Spurs 257m.
A new stadium will not bridge that financial gap. Commercial revenue dwarfs that and that is where Spurs are so far behind the 'big 5'.
Whether this is down to Levy not accelerating the commercial side at Spurs, or Spurs not being a big enough club to develop, is debatable
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool have spent hundreds of millions over the last 7 years and have made it into the top 4 once. Same with Chelsea and they have been in the top 4 just once more than us in the last 5.
We have the best defence in the league and one of the best strikers in the league. We should be in a title race.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agree, Liverpool and Chelsea have spent more than Spurs. All earned fair and square from commercial revenue because they are bigger clubs.
And it is a big advantage. Which is why Chelsea have won Champions League, Premier League, FA Cup, League Cup and even Europey League.
They can afford to pay the best players big wages.
You should not be in title race. Be realistic,
posted on 31/10/16
This article is going well
posted on 31/10/16
comment by CFC: FFP Champions (U20729)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by CFC: FFP Champions (U20729)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by CFC: FFP Champions (U20729)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)
posted 8 minutes ago
If someone had said to me that a team has been unbeaten this far into the league, I'd assume they were at the top of the table. I mean it's great that we're so hard to beat but that is all such a waste if we aren't getting the job done at the other end.
The likes of Eriksen and Lamela, they need to step it up this season or we should seriously think about upgrading.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why? They are top-six club standard players at a top six club.
You are getting ahead of yourself thinking you should have top 4, Champions-League standard players across all positions at your club.
Last season was a one-off for you and Lesta.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah because if you're a top 6 club you should never strive to be anything more than that.
Why are Chelsea fans striving for more when they're a mid-table club then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You should strive to get top 4, of course. But thinking you can challenge for the title is deluded.
Your revenue and resources are behind Arsenal and Chelsea. Miles behind City and United. And you don't have any history of winning DNA at your club.
Levy needs to get the club revenue up to Arsenal and Chelsea's standard in order to compete for top 4 regularly season after season.
Arsenal 435 euro, Chelsea 420m, Liverpool 391m, Spurs 257m.
A new stadium will not bridge that financial gap. Commercial revenue dwarfs that and that is where Spurs are so far behind the 'big 5'.
Whether this is down to Levy not accelerating the commercial side at Spurs, or Spurs not being a big enough club to develop, is debatable
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool have spent hundreds of millions over the last 7 years and have made it into the top 4 once. Same with Chelsea and they have been in the top 4 just once more than us in the last 5.
We have the best defence in the league and one of the best strikers in the league. We should be in a title race.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agree, Liverpool and Chelsea have spent more than Spurs. All earned fair and square from commercial revenue because they are bigger clubs.
And it is a big advantage. Which is why Chelsea have won Champions League, Premier League, FA Cup, League Cup and even Europey League.
They can afford to pay the best players big wages.
You should not be in title race. Be realistic,
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So what you're saying is that Spurs have done brilliantly for overachieving with the lack of resources that other big teams have had?
Yes I agree. But we should still be in a title race as we have the quality in our side like other big teams, and are ambitious.
posted on 31/10/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 31/10/16
talking rubbish but this is a chelsea fan so that's no surprise. Why shouldn't we be in the title race? I couldn't give a flying f** if Liverpool are a big club. We have finished about those muppets in 6 of the last 7 seasons so in recent history, it's normal for us to finish above them so how the hell do you come to the conclusion that Liverpool are realistic title contenders but spurs not? Not to mention we have one of the best sides in the league and the youngest. We should be challenging the title no doubt about it and will be for a long time so i suggest you just deal with it mate.
posted on 31/10/16
Reading the media today we are a disgrace and are bang on to be relegated I think it is grossly unfair and unjust.
We are the lowest conceding in the league and unbeaten that actually is good. You can look at it negative but look at it in a positive way.....
We are playing rubbish toothless and are without our two best players Toby and Harry. Two world class players the only two we have. Lloris is quality but never world class with his child like distribution and kicking.
There are positives to be had. We will improve when they return.
posted on 31/10/16
comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by CFC: FFP Champions (U20729)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by CFC: FFP Champions (U20729)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by CFC: FFP Champions (U20729)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)
posted 8 minutes ago
If someone had said to me that a team has been unbeaten this far into the league, I'd assume they were at the top of the table. I mean it's great that we're so hard to beat but that is all such a waste if we aren't getting the job done at the other end.
The likes of Eriksen and Lamela, they need to step it up this season or we should seriously think about upgrading.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why? They are top-six club standard players at a top six club.
You are getting ahead of yourself thinking you should have top 4, Champions-League standard players across all positions at your club.
Last season was a one-off for you and Lesta.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah because if you're a top 6 club you should never strive to be anything more than that.
Why are Chelsea fans striving for more when they're a mid-table club then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You should strive to get top 4, of course. But thinking you can challenge for the title is deluded.
Your revenue and resources are behind Arsenal and Chelsea. Miles behind City and United. And you don't have any history of winning DNA at your club.
Levy needs to get the club revenue up to Arsenal and Chelsea's standard in order to compete for top 4 regularly season after season.
Arsenal 435 euro, Chelsea 420m, Liverpool 391m, Spurs 257m.
A new stadium will not bridge that financial gap. Commercial revenue dwarfs that and that is where Spurs are so far behind the 'big 5'.
Whether this is down to Levy not accelerating the commercial side at Spurs, or Spurs not being a big enough club to develop, is debatable
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool have spent hundreds of millions over the last 7 years and have made it into the top 4 once. Same with Chelsea and they have been in the top 4 just once more than us in the last 5.
We have the best defence in the league and one of the best strikers in the league. We should be in a title race.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agree, Liverpool and Chelsea have spent more than Spurs. All earned fair and square from commercial revenue because they are bigger clubs.
And it is a big advantage. Which is why Chelsea have won Champions League, Premier League, FA Cup, League Cup and even Europey League.
They can afford to pay the best players big wages.
You should not be in title race. Be realistic,
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So what you're saying is that Spurs have done brilliantly for overachieving with the lack of resources that other big teams have had?
Yes I agree. But we should still be in a title race as we have the quality in our side like other big teams, and are ambitious.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes you did well overachieving - for once season - while Chelsea United Liverpool flopped.
Brilliantly? No. Lesta overachieved brilliantly.
Atletico are an example of a club overachievably brilliantly season after season. CL finals and league titles against with an even bigger advantage Real and Barca
posted on 31/10/16
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 7 minutes ago
talking rubbish but this is a chelsea fan so that's no surprise. Why shouldn't we be in the title race? I couldn't give a flying f** if Liverpool are a big club. We have finished about those muppets in 6 of the last 7 seasons so in recent history, it's normal for us to finish above them so how the hell do you come to the conclusion that Liverpool are realistic title contenders but spurs not? Not to mention we have one of the best sides in the league and the youngest. We should be challenging the title no doubt about it and will be for a long time so i suggest you just deal with it mate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I disagree. If and when Liverpool and United get their act together you will be pushed out of top 4 for forseeable future.
Top 4 for next few seasons: City. Chelsea. Two from Liverpool United Arsenal
Your team is overhyped
posted on 31/10/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 31/10/16
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 20 minutes ago
talking rubbish but this is a chelsea fan so that's no surprise. Why shouldn't we be in the title race? I couldn't give a flying f** if Liverpool are a big club. We have finished about those muppets in 6 of the last 7 seasons so in recent history, it's normal for us to finish above them so how the hell do you come to the conclusion that Liverpool are realistic title contenders but spurs not? Not to mention we have one of the best sides in the league and the youngest. We should be challenging the title no doubt about it and will be for a long time so i suggest you just deal with it mate.
---------------------
Just a touch bitey?
posted on 31/10/16
All this unbeaten talk is annoying. Not as if we've picked up points in loads of games we were expected to lose. 3 draws after the City game - 3 points out of 9 - feels like facking defeats anyway. Same as last season, not killing off the weaker teams.
Chronic, why are you entertaining that Chelsea rodent? Worthless scrote is obsessed with Spurs.
posted on 31/10/16
Similar to last season. Too many draws and seemingly not enough drive to grind out wins / too cautious not to drop points
I remember last season thinking "serves us right" after losing to Newcastle at home, as we showed very little ambition to win a game and were instead happy knocking the ball about in defense. Mind, after that defeat to Newcastle we got our shiet together, as if it was a wake up call. Maybe a loss (instead of another bunch of draws) wouldn't be such a bad thing
posted on 31/10/16
comment by Ledley's knee surgeon; Football Manager legend. (U20121)
posted 44 minutes ago
All this unbeaten talk is annoying. Not as if we've picked up points in loads of games we were expected to lose. 3 draws after the City game - 3 points out of 9 - feels like facking defeats anyway. Same as last season, not killing off the weaker teams.
Chronic, why are you entertaining that Chelsea rodent? Worthless scrote is obsessed with Spurs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
he does seem to spend an unhealthy amount of time here really.
posted on 31/10/16
comment by LukaCorluka (U1220)
posted 1 hour, 7 minutes ago
Similar to last season. Too many draws and seemingly not enough drive to grind out wins / too cautious not to drop points
I remember last season thinking "serves us right" after losing to Newcastle at home, as we showed very little ambition to win a game and were instead happy knocking the ball about in defense. Mind, after that defeat to Newcastle we got our shiet together, as if it was a wake up call. Maybe a loss (instead of another bunch of draws) wouldn't be such a bad thing
----------------------------------------------------------------------
well yeah, but we have arsenal west ham and Chelsea next.
fack losing any of those !
posted on 31/10/16
I disagree. If and when Liverpool and United get their act together you will be pushed out of top 4 for forseeable future.
Top 4 for next few seasons: City. Chelsea. Two from Liverpool United Arsenal
Your team is overhyped "
and your team are sh** and are just going through a little honeymoon spell. Chelsea will be back to abysmal performances in no time when the likes of Hazard etc can't be bothered. Big difference is spurs have a young side that actually want to play for eachother and the club. Your club consists of a bunch of expensive mishaps that at the flick of the switch decide they no longer want to play well for the club. Chelsea are going to find it hard to even get in the top 4 no doubt it/.. You are not on the level to win the title and you certainly ain't better than spurs
posted on 31/10/16
comment by CFC: FFP Champions (U20729)
posted 3 hours, 41 minutes ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 7 minutes ago
talking rubbish but this is a chelsea fan so that's no surprise. Why shouldn't we be in the title race? I couldn't give a flying f** if Liverpool are a big club. We have finished about those muppets in 6 of the last 7 seasons so in recent history, it's normal for us to finish above them so how the hell do you come to the conclusion that Liverpool are realistic title contenders but spurs not? Not to mention we have one of the best sides in the league and the youngest. We should be challenging the title no doubt about it and will be for a long time so i suggest you just deal with it mate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I disagree. If and when Liverpool and United get their act together you will be pushed out of top 4 for forseeable future.
Top 4 for next few seasons: City. Chelsea. Two from Liverpool United Arsenal
Your team is overhyped
----------------------------------------------------------------------
haha you dopey mug.... arsenal wont be going out the top 4 any time soon, they are the most consistent top 4 finisher and have been for ages.
if a team will miss out, it will be Chelsea, as you have done a couple of times recently
posted on 31/10/16
Chelsea are not even that good chronic as proved by their total spanking at the emirates. They are going through a good spell but will fall back down like a pack of cards in no time. Spurs are a better side than chelsea no doubt about it. We just need to get our act together.
Page 3 of 4