Your in the same bracket as Use ?
Your as in you're?
Use as in ?
Was a typo, Us (as in City)*
NEE NAW NEE NAW ITS DE SPEELING POLECEI
*Correcting grammer the sign of losing a arguement.
Correcting punctuation when somebody is using a phone to type is always the sign of desperation. Keep believing your an elite club though pal
What's racist about referring to someone from an Arabic county as an Arab?...
...Oh - it's "need" not "ned
--------------------------
...And it's country not county.
Goodness me, I have always viewed Man City fans as a load of odious twerps, but I hadn't realised until tonight just how thick and obnoxious they are.
I had the misfortune of walking down Tottenham High Road two weeks ago at the same time these thick twonks arrived for the game. Completely out of their brains at 11 in the morning and singing "we're Man City and we're out of heads"
Wow, what intelligence. Morons, the lot of them and on the old BBC606 and this JA606, have time after time, proved themselves to be the most clueless bunch of dimwits going.
I have no time whatsoever for such a mickey mouse club with awful fans.
"I have no time whatsoever for such a mickey mouse club with awful fans"
Then why have you just spent time writing about the club and its "awful" fans?
RipleysCat - get stuffed sunshine.
Man Citzens vs Ensil. This thread will be worth a read from start to finish
And spending yet more of your time replying...
Spurs history might not be on the level of Man U, Liverpool ect but the difference between Spurs and them is the difference between Spurs and Man City. Man City are simply not on Spurs level in terms of history. In 10 years time that may change who knows, but until then your just a small club with big money.
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 26 seconds ago
And spending yet more of your time replying...
He didn't reply to anyone - he made a single comment based upon what he had read.
Actually, he's made two comments in the last few minutes. The second of which he addressed directly to me. That would be a reply to me would it not?
You're right - I missed that one - it was the one where he told you to get stuffed wasn't it?
The most important thing in English football - the top division.
Man City wins - 2
Tottenham wins - 2
Yes i see why you are so superior now. your just a good cup team.
Joe Lewis, why dont you come home?
Yes, and such an eloquent reply it was to.
Oh dearie me, here comes Man Citizens, another first class fool
Spurcat, why wont big Joe Lewis come home?
The most important thing in English football - the top division.
Man City wins - 2
Tottenham wins - 2
Yes i see why you are so superior now. your just a good cup team.
Joe Lewis, why dont you come home?
-------------------
Yep that's right were a good cup team and have won lots compared to Man City, that's why we have a better History and have been more successful than your team. Simple really.
Man City are a great club with probably the most loyal following in England. Not even 12 years ago they were in the 3rd tier of English Football yet pulling in higher average gates than ALL 2nd tier clubs (bar Sunderland) and a fair handful of Premier League clubs.
To call City a small club is just stupid, they never have been and never will be.
Spurs have a hugely loyal following as well, they have been carp for most of their history and lived in the shadow of the other London clubs for all decades of their history bar the 80s.
No history is better than another, despite what plastic Scousers and Mancs would have people believe.
There was a time when Huddersfield an Aston Villa had won more trophies than Man Utd and Liverpool, does that make them bigger clubs?
Spurs are a big club, City are a big club, Chelsea are a big club. End of discussion
60's Spurs average league position 4th with a 1st, 2nd and 3rd
60's Arsenal's average league position 9th, no top 3 finishes
60's Chelsea average league position 7th, 2 x top 3 and 1 relegation
So that's the 60's where Spurs were dominant as well then.
The 70's were pretty good too - we won several cups in the decade.
Whoopy doo
The only history that's relevant is the 5-1 annihilation in your last game,now is all that matters
DC5 how can it be a dominant period with 1 league title to show for it? Being dominant would mean you were by far the best side in the country for most of that period. 1 league title out of 10 attempts during that decade suggests otherwise.
There have only been 2 clubs that have actually donminated a long period of time.
Number of seasons spent in the top flight:
Tottenham Hotspur 77
Man City 83
As both teams are on 2 league titles does that give City an edge in the league?
Sign in if you want to comment
Tottenham fans,will you be supporting city?
Page 3 of 9
6 | 7 | 8 | 9
posted on 8/9/11
Would you rather*
posted on 8/9/11
Your in the same bracket as Use ?
Your as in you're?
Use as in ?
posted on 8/9/11
Was a typo, Us (as in City)*
posted on 8/9/11
NEE NAW NEE NAW ITS DE SPEELING POLECEI
*Correcting grammer the sign of losing a arguement.
posted on 8/9/11
Correcting punctuation when somebody is using a phone to type is always the sign of desperation. Keep believing your an elite club though pal
posted on 8/9/11
What's racist about referring to someone from an Arabic county as an Arab?...
...Oh - it's "need" not "ned
--------------------------
...And it's country not county.
posted on 8/9/11
Goodness me, I have always viewed Man City fans as a load of odious twerps, but I hadn't realised until tonight just how thick and obnoxious they are.
I had the misfortune of walking down Tottenham High Road two weeks ago at the same time these thick twonks arrived for the game. Completely out of their brains at 11 in the morning and singing "we're Man City and we're out of heads"
Wow, what intelligence. Morons, the lot of them and on the old BBC606 and this JA606, have time after time, proved themselves to be the most clueless bunch of dimwits going.
I have no time whatsoever for such a mickey mouse club with awful fans.
posted on 8/9/11
"I have no time whatsoever for such a mickey mouse club with awful fans"
Then why have you just spent time writing about the club and its "awful" fans?
posted on 8/9/11
RipleysCat - get stuffed sunshine.
posted on 8/9/11
Man Citzens vs Ensil. This thread will be worth a read from start to finish
posted on 8/9/11
And spending yet more of your time replying...
posted on 8/9/11
Spurs history might not be on the level of Man U, Liverpool ect but the difference between Spurs and them is the difference between Spurs and Man City. Man City are simply not on Spurs level in terms of history. In 10 years time that may change who knows, but until then your just a small club with big money.
posted on 8/9/11
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 26 seconds ago
And spending yet more of your time replying...
He didn't reply to anyone - he made a single comment based upon what he had read.
posted on 8/9/11
Actually, he's made two comments in the last few minutes. The second of which he addressed directly to me. That would be a reply to me would it not?
posted on 8/9/11
You're right - I missed that one - it was the one where he told you to get stuffed wasn't it?
posted on 8/9/11
The most important thing in English football - the top division.
Man City wins - 2
Tottenham wins - 2
Yes i see why you are so superior now. your just a good cup team.
Joe Lewis, why dont you come home?
posted on 8/9/11
Yes, and such an eloquent reply it was to.
posted on 8/9/11
Oh dearie me, here comes Man Citizens, another first class fool
posted on 8/9/11
Spurcat, why wont big Joe Lewis come home?
posted on 8/9/11
The most important thing in English football - the top division.
Man City wins - 2
Tottenham wins - 2
Yes i see why you are so superior now. your just a good cup team.
Joe Lewis, why dont you come home?
-------------------
Yep that's right were a good cup team and have won lots compared to Man City, that's why we have a better History and have been more successful than your team. Simple really.
posted on 8/9/11
Man City are a great club with probably the most loyal following in England. Not even 12 years ago they were in the 3rd tier of English Football yet pulling in higher average gates than ALL 2nd tier clubs (bar Sunderland) and a fair handful of Premier League clubs.
To call City a small club is just stupid, they never have been and never will be.
Spurs have a hugely loyal following as well, they have been carp for most of their history and lived in the shadow of the other London clubs for all decades of their history bar the 80s.
No history is better than another, despite what plastic Scousers and Mancs would have people believe.
There was a time when Huddersfield an Aston Villa had won more trophies than Man Utd and Liverpool, does that make them bigger clubs?
Spurs are a big club, City are a big club, Chelsea are a big club. End of discussion
posted on 8/9/11
60's Spurs average league position 4th with a 1st, 2nd and 3rd
60's Arsenal's average league position 9th, no top 3 finishes
60's Chelsea average league position 7th, 2 x top 3 and 1 relegation
So that's the 60's where Spurs were dominant as well then.
The 70's were pretty good too - we won several cups in the decade.
posted on 8/9/11
Whoopy doo
The only history that's relevant is the 5-1 annihilation in your last game,now is all that matters
posted on 8/9/11
DC5 how can it be a dominant period with 1 league title to show for it? Being dominant would mean you were by far the best side in the country for most of that period. 1 league title out of 10 attempts during that decade suggests otherwise.
There have only been 2 clubs that have actually donminated a long period of time.
posted on 8/9/11
Number of seasons spent in the top flight:
Tottenham Hotspur 77
Man City 83
As both teams are on 2 league titles does that give City an edge in the league?
Page 3 of 9
6 | 7 | 8 | 9