The media love a bull$hit saga, caants.
Pep and Alexis don't get on. Neither do Cesc and Pep. They both harbour grudges for not being played enough and not having enough respect from Pep. This is why Conte started Cesc against Man City.
------------------------------------------
lol.....you come up with strange stuff at times. Cesc and Alexis were regulars under Pep. And Conte played Cesc against City cos Matic was unavailable.
comment by Sheriff John Brown - bring back David Dein (U7482)
posted 1 hour, 22 minutes ago
Pep and Alexis don't get on. Neither do Cesc and Pep. They both harbour grudges for not being played enough and not having enough respect from Pep. This is why Conte started Cesc against Man City.
------------------------------------------
lol.....you come up with strange stuff at times. Cesc and Alexis were regulars under Pep. And Conte played Cesc against City cos Matic was unavailable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pep was heavily critical on both. He signed them both and neither worked out for him. Pep constantly berated Cesc for a lack of positional sense. And Alexis was always injured or moved out of position. Neither were successful at Barca under Pep or others by that matter. Why do you think they were sold?
I wasn't disputing how successful they were at Barca. I was disputing the claim they held grudges for not being played enough and that was untrue as Cesc and Alexis were regulars. There was one season Fabregas played more minutes than any Barca player.
comment by Better Call Zlatan - Football taught by Matt Busby (U11781)
posted 1 week, 2 days ago
comment by The Godfather (U10154)
posted 33 minutes ago
Is city really a step up??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Haha is that a serious question?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Arsenal are currently above city, finished above city last year and havent lost to city in almost 4 years. Please tell me in what way city can be classed as a significant step up?
comment by The Godfather (U10154)
posted 1 hour, 54 minutes ago
comment by Better Call Zlatan - Football taught by Matt Busby(U11781)
posted 1 week, 2 days ago
comment by The Godfather (U10154)
posted 33 minutes ago
Is city really a step up??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Haha is that a serious question?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Arsenal are currently above city, finished above city last year and havent lost to city in almost 4 years. Please tell me in what way city can be classed as a significant step up?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They're more likely to win something of note....
Sign in if you want to comment
PEP DENIES SANCHEZ CONTACT
Page 2 of 2
posted on 8/12/16
The media love a bull$hit saga, caants.
posted on 8/12/16
Pep and Alexis don't get on. Neither do Cesc and Pep. They both harbour grudges for not being played enough and not having enough respect from Pep. This is why Conte started Cesc against Man City.
------------------------------------------
lol.....you come up with strange stuff at times. Cesc and Alexis were regulars under Pep. And Conte played Cesc against City cos Matic was unavailable.
posted on 8/12/16
comment by Sheriff John Brown - bring back David Dein (U7482)
posted 1 hour, 22 minutes ago
Pep and Alexis don't get on. Neither do Cesc and Pep. They both harbour grudges for not being played enough and not having enough respect from Pep. This is why Conte started Cesc against Man City.
------------------------------------------
lol.....you come up with strange stuff at times. Cesc and Alexis were regulars under Pep. And Conte played Cesc against City cos Matic was unavailable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pep was heavily critical on both. He signed them both and neither worked out for him. Pep constantly berated Cesc for a lack of positional sense. And Alexis was always injured or moved out of position. Neither were successful at Barca under Pep or others by that matter. Why do you think they were sold?
posted on 8/12/16
I wasn't disputing how successful they were at Barca. I was disputing the claim they held grudges for not being played enough and that was untrue as Cesc and Alexis were regulars. There was one season Fabregas played more minutes than any Barca player.
posted on 17/12/16
comment by Better Call Zlatan - Football taught by Matt Busby (U11781)
posted 1 week, 2 days ago
comment by The Godfather (U10154)
posted 33 minutes ago
Is city really a step up??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Haha is that a serious question?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Arsenal are currently above city, finished above city last year and havent lost to city in almost 4 years. Please tell me in what way city can be classed as a significant step up?
posted on 17/12/16
comment by The Godfather (U10154)
posted 1 hour, 54 minutes ago
comment by Better Call Zlatan - Football taught by Matt Busby(U11781)
posted 1 week, 2 days ago
comment by The Godfather (U10154)
posted 33 minutes ago
Is city really a step up??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Haha is that a serious question?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Arsenal are currently above city, finished above city last year and havent lost to city in almost 4 years. Please tell me in what way city can be classed as a significant step up?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They're more likely to win something of note....
Page 2 of 2