All of them are garbage apart from Mane
by 🏆....care to expand on your reasoning??
Sakho is an example of a good player made to look poor by bad management. No one dares criticise Klopp so they just look at Sakho's performances for an openly attacking Liverpool side without a decent defensive midfielder and pronounce him to be a laughing stock, but he was quality at palace under a manager that knows how to orgNise a defence
So, IF we dont sign what we expect id be happy enough with the likes of Gomez, Flanagan, Ings and Sakho doing a job!
so would the 19 other PL clubs, fingers crossed.
Sakho won't play for us again, Gomez is totally unproven, Flanno is done,
Flanno is rash in the tackle, just gets overlooked because he's a local lad.
He couldn't get a game for Burnley on loan.. tells you everything.
The only one I would keep is Sakho
Ings/Flanagan are injury prone, Gomez is totally unproven and people are re-writing history regarding the games he played. He was like a fish out of water in a couple of them.
red...well, id prefer to look at when he actually played for us at Anfield, what more evidence do u need?
Didnt play at Burnley i know, doesnt mean he aint good enough. KDB didnt play at CFC, Di Maria couldnt play at Utd...
Didnt play at Burnley i know, doesnt mean he aint good enough
-----------
Read that again, and repeat a hundred times.. if you don't see anything wrong with it, go and have a lie down.. until 2018/19
I still like Flanno, I hope Klopp can work with the lad but it doesn't look good.
I think Ings is a trier but lacks class when you look at where we are trying to progress to. Also his injuries suggests it's almost impossible for him to come back.
Gomez is the only realistic option to progress IMO and Klopp will decide if he's good enough in pre season. I don't think he will make the grade in all honesty.
As for Sakho he blew it ages ago with his crazy antics.
comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 26 minutes ago
red...well, id prefer to look at when he actually played for us at Anfield, what more evidence do u need?
Didnt play at Burnley i know, doesnt mean he aint good enough. KDB didnt play at CFC, Di Maria couldnt play at Utd...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There is a world of difference between Chelsea, United and Burnley.
But I do like flanno. It shows that even the uggos can play football.
flannagan was rock steady when he filled in a couple of seasons ago.
maybe burnley not playing him says more about burnley than flannagan.
sacko is better than lovren imo.
comment by Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
posted 19 minutes ago
Didnt play at Burnley i know, doesnt mean he aint good enough
-----------
Read that again, and repeat a hundred times.. if you don't see anything wrong with it, go and have a lie down.. until 2018/19
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mascherano didn't play at West Ham. I want Flanagan to be given another chance.
Flanno tackles the way that defenders used to play before football became a non contact sport.
Burnley didn't give him a chance, probably because the lad does actually try to get forward.
firms...exactly what i mean, but red just makes himself looked silly
I reckon Flanagan is the type of player that Klopp will really like. I can see him getting games.
Ok.
That's despite klopp sending him on loan?
I'm sure the idea was to give him game time after injury. I remember seeing we tell clubs that our loanees must play in 75% of games they are available for otherwise they have to pay a penalty.
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 6 minutes ago
I'm sure the idea was to give him game time after injury. I remember seeing we tell clubs that our loanees must play in 75% of games they are available for otherwise they have to pay a penalty.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Were Burnley happy to pay the penalty?
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 6 minutes ago
I'm sure the idea was to give him game time after injury. I remember seeing we tell clubs that our loanees must play in 75% of games they are available for otherwise they have to pay a penalty.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Were Burnley happy to pay the penalty?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No idea, you'll have to ask them.
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 6 minutes ago
I'm sure the idea was to give him game time after injury. I remember seeing we tell clubs that our loanees must play in 75% of games they are available for otherwise they have to pay a penalty.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Were Burnley happy to pay the penalty?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No idea, you'll have to ask them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hey! Hey Burnley, yeah you guys.
Was Flanno that ugly you never played him because you were worried about home attendances?
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 6 minutes ago
I'm sure the idea was to give him game time after injury. I remember seeing we tell clubs that our loanees must play in 75% of games they are available for otherwise they have to pay a penalty.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Were Burnley happy to pay the penalty?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No idea, you'll have to ask them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hey! Hey Burnley, yeah you guys.
Was Flanno that ugly you never played him because you were worried about home attendances?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If clubs take physical appearance into account then Rooney hasn't got a hope of getting games for you.
comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 1 hour, 15 minutes ago
firms...exactly what i mean, but red just makes himself looked silly
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The difference there is that Masch was top quality. No matter how you paint it, Flanno simply ain't. He's far too slow, but because he's a local lad and he tries really really hard, some people think he's a good player! He's not. Never was, never will be.
He has done well for us in the past, and I have hopes that he will do again. I'm not saying he is going to be first choice in either full back position, but definitely worth keeping.
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 6 minutes ago
I'm sure the idea was to give him game time after injury. I remember seeing we tell clubs that our loanees must play in 75% of games they are available for otherwise they have to pay a penalty.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Were Burnley happy to pay the penalty?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No idea, you'll have to ask them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hey! Hey Burnley, yeah you guys.
Was Flanno that ugly you never played him because you were worried about home attendances?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If clubs take physical appearance into account then Rooney hasn't got a hope of getting games for you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh that's not even a decent reply.
Jon 'Klopek' Flannagan has a face that would keep flies away from steaming fresh log 💩
Sign in if you want to comment
The returned!
Page 1 of 2
posted on 6/7/17
All of them are garbage apart from Mane
posted on 6/7/17
by 🏆....care to expand on your reasoning??
posted on 6/7/17
Sakho is an example of a good player made to look poor by bad management. No one dares criticise Klopp so they just look at Sakho's performances for an openly attacking Liverpool side without a decent defensive midfielder and pronounce him to be a laughing stock, but he was quality at palace under a manager that knows how to orgNise a defence
posted on 6/7/17
So, IF we dont sign what we expect id be happy enough with the likes of Gomez, Flanagan, Ings and Sakho doing a job!
so would the 19 other PL clubs, fingers crossed.
posted on 6/7/17
Sakho won't play for us again, Gomez is totally unproven, Flanno is done,
posted on 6/7/17
Flanno is rash in the tackle, just gets overlooked because he's a local lad.
He couldn't get a game for Burnley on loan.. tells you everything.
posted on 6/7/17
The only one I would keep is Sakho
Ings/Flanagan are injury prone, Gomez is totally unproven and people are re-writing history regarding the games he played. He was like a fish out of water in a couple of them.
posted on 6/7/17
red...well, id prefer to look at when he actually played for us at Anfield, what more evidence do u need?
Didnt play at Burnley i know, doesnt mean he aint good enough. KDB didnt play at CFC, Di Maria couldnt play at Utd...
posted on 6/7/17
Didnt play at Burnley i know, doesnt mean he aint good enough
-----------
Read that again, and repeat a hundred times.. if you don't see anything wrong with it, go and have a lie down.. until 2018/19
posted on 6/7/17
I still like Flanno, I hope Klopp can work with the lad but it doesn't look good.
I think Ings is a trier but lacks class when you look at where we are trying to progress to. Also his injuries suggests it's almost impossible for him to come back.
Gomez is the only realistic option to progress IMO and Klopp will decide if he's good enough in pre season. I don't think he will make the grade in all honesty.
As for Sakho he blew it ages ago with his crazy antics.
posted on 6/7/17
comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 26 minutes ago
red...well, id prefer to look at when he actually played for us at Anfield, what more evidence do u need?
Didnt play at Burnley i know, doesnt mean he aint good enough. KDB didnt play at CFC, Di Maria couldnt play at Utd...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There is a world of difference between Chelsea, United and Burnley.
But I do like flanno. It shows that even the uggos can play football.
posted on 6/7/17
flannagan was rock steady when he filled in a couple of seasons ago.
maybe burnley not playing him says more about burnley than flannagan.
sacko is better than lovren imo.
posted on 6/7/17
comment by Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
posted 19 minutes ago
Didnt play at Burnley i know, doesnt mean he aint good enough
-----------
Read that again, and repeat a hundred times.. if you don't see anything wrong with it, go and have a lie down.. until 2018/19
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mascherano didn't play at West Ham. I want Flanagan to be given another chance.
posted on 6/7/17
Flanno tackles the way that defenders used to play before football became a non contact sport.
Burnley didn't give him a chance, probably because the lad does actually try to get forward.
posted on 6/7/17
firms...exactly what i mean, but red just makes himself looked silly
posted on 6/7/17
I reckon Flanagan is the type of player that Klopp will really like. I can see him getting games.
posted on 6/7/17
Ok.
That's despite klopp sending him on loan?
posted on 6/7/17
I'm sure the idea was to give him game time after injury. I remember seeing we tell clubs that our loanees must play in 75% of games they are available for otherwise they have to pay a penalty.
posted on 6/7/17
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 6 minutes ago
I'm sure the idea was to give him game time after injury. I remember seeing we tell clubs that our loanees must play in 75% of games they are available for otherwise they have to pay a penalty.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Were Burnley happy to pay the penalty?
posted on 6/7/17
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 6 minutes ago
I'm sure the idea was to give him game time after injury. I remember seeing we tell clubs that our loanees must play in 75% of games they are available for otherwise they have to pay a penalty.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Were Burnley happy to pay the penalty?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No idea, you'll have to ask them.
posted on 6/7/17
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 6 minutes ago
I'm sure the idea was to give him game time after injury. I remember seeing we tell clubs that our loanees must play in 75% of games they are available for otherwise they have to pay a penalty.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Were Burnley happy to pay the penalty?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No idea, you'll have to ask them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hey! Hey Burnley, yeah you guys.
Was Flanno that ugly you never played him because you were worried about home attendances?
posted on 6/7/17
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 6 minutes ago
I'm sure the idea was to give him game time after injury. I remember seeing we tell clubs that our loanees must play in 75% of games they are available for otherwise they have to pay a penalty.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Were Burnley happy to pay the penalty?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No idea, you'll have to ask them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hey! Hey Burnley, yeah you guys.
Was Flanno that ugly you never played him because you were worried about home attendances?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If clubs take physical appearance into account then Rooney hasn't got a hope of getting games for you.
posted on 6/7/17
comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 1 hour, 15 minutes ago
firms...exactly what i mean, but red just makes himself looked silly
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The difference there is that Masch was top quality. No matter how you paint it, Flanno simply ain't. He's far too slow, but because he's a local lad and he tries really really hard, some people think he's a good player! He's not. Never was, never will be.
posted on 6/7/17
He has done well for us in the past, and I have hopes that he will do again. I'm not saying he is going to be first choice in either full back position, but definitely worth keeping.
posted on 6/7/17
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 6 minutes ago
I'm sure the idea was to give him game time after injury. I remember seeing we tell clubs that our loanees must play in 75% of games they are available for otherwise they have to pay a penalty.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Were Burnley happy to pay the penalty?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No idea, you'll have to ask them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hey! Hey Burnley, yeah you guys.
Was Flanno that ugly you never played him because you were worried about home attendances?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If clubs take physical appearance into account then Rooney hasn't got a hope of getting games for you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh that's not even a decent reply.
Jon 'Klopek' Flannagan has a face that would keep flies away from steaming fresh log 💩
Page 1 of 2